Theories : Interactionalism Flashcards
Lemert (1951)
Identified primary and secondary deviance. Primary deviance is the action and its consequences but secondary deviance is the social response
Beker (1963)
Claimed that acts only become deviant when others label them as such.
No act is inherently deviant
Labelling
Stan Cohen (1972)
Was working within an interactionist framework in his discussion of the deviance implication spiral, in which press exaggeration and distorted reporting of events led to the formation of folk devils and moral panics ‘mods and rockers’
Piliavin and Briar (1964)
Found that police decisions to arrest a youth were mainly based on physical cues
Cicourel (1968)
Officers typifications influenced their decision to arrest
Justice is not fixed but negotiable
MC youth less likely to be charged
Young (1971)
Uses Lemert’s concept of secondary deviance
In his study of hippie marijuana users in Notting Hill
Found that media amplified deviance generating a self-fulfilling prophecy where the group developed a deviant dubculture
Downes and Rock (2003)
We can’t predict whether someone who has been labelled will follow a deviant career because they are always free to choose not to deviate further
Triplett (2000)
Notes an increasing tendency to see young offenders as evil and to be less tolerant of minor deviance
Hall (1979)
Explored the racist nature of media coverage moral panics around mugging
Ditton and Duffy (1983)
Much media reporting of crime focuses on violence but these make up about 3% of the crimes reported to the police.
Felson (1996)
Uses the term dramatic fallacy to describe the way in which the media present a series of false beliefs about crime and the solutions to crime in order to entertain rater than present realism
Blumer (1969)
Society is created by how humans act together -> people make society, not society making people
Therefore meanings are not fixed -> what’s viewed as crime can differ
Braithwaite
Distinguish between types of shaming:
Reintegrative shaming - punishes them in a way that strengthens their bonds with society.
Disintegrative shaming - punishment which isolates the individual and causes secondary deviance.
Ackers (1975)
Suggests that individuals might simply choose to be deviant regardless of whether they have been labelled
Taylor et al (1973)
Labelling theory is wrong in suggesting that deviance is created by the social groups who define acts as deviant
Some acts such as incest will always be regarded as deviant in our society