theories and functions of the family Flashcards
what approach do functionalists have?
adopt a very positive march of progress approach -that believes the family is constantly moving forward and improving
briefly explain what Murdock meant when he described the family as a universal institution
-functionalism
The family is the most important social institution and is found in all cultures, countries and societies
briefly explain the 4 functions Murdock believes the family performs to meet the needs of society, and explain what would happen if this function wasn’t performed
-functionalism
sexual: allows couples to maintain a healthy relationship by promoting monogamy and stables satisfaction of the sex drive that prevents social disruption. If not their relationshio will breakdown/increase divorce which makes their childs life unstable.
reproduction: allows the next gen of workforce to maintain social stability & mobility. If not society breaks down as there is an increased ageing population and decreased birth rate that increases dependency ratio.
economic: allows children to be better supported as the family can fufill personal needs that government cannot 100% fufill. If not children become more dependent on government which leads to child poverty, decreasing their life chances.
socialisation: social stability/harmony can be maintained by an agreeance of n&v’s that carry though into a childs life. If not children may begin to become more deviant due to a lack of these valuable unwritten rules of society
briefly explain which of Murdocks functions same-sex, lone parent, extended, w/c families cannot perform
-functionalist
same sex: reproduction, socialisation (have different norms)
lone parent: sexual, economic, reproduction
extended: economic (more members to provide for)
w/c: economic, socialisation
briefly explain the functional fit between extended families in pre-industrial and nucleur families in industrial society that Parsons argues there to be
-functionalist
pre-industrial = extended family most common, as there was very few social institutions (no education or healthcare) meaning the family needed very large to perform all the necessary functions
**industrial **= nucleur families, many different social institutions (schools, NHS) perform the functions the family required to in the past, so family can be smaller.
what 2 workforces does the nucleur family provide in modern industrial society, according to Parsons?
-functionalist
geographically mobile workforce (it can move around the country easily)
socially mobile workforce (members can move up the class structure)
briefly explain the 2 essential irreducible functions the family provides according to Parsons
-functionalism
primary socialisation of children: teaches n&v’s that enables children to cooperate with others and become fully functioing adults (manners, speech does, etc)
the stabilisation of adult personalities/warm bath theory: where adults can relax and destress to be able to return to the workplace refreshed and ready to meet demands. Functionalists believes this benefits both individuals and the economy
give the evaluation points of Parsons (functionalist) theory of the family by:
-Laslett
-Young & Willmott
-Post-modernists
Laslett: argues the extended family was never really dominant in pre-industrial society, because of high infant mortality rates and short life expectancy
Y&W: believe industrialisation created a mum-centred extended family, where children relied on mums for emotional support and socialisation
post-modrenists: in 21st century nucleur family is no longer the norm, due to technology and transport making extended families popular again
what is the main idea marxists have of the family?
the family reproduces and maintains class-based inequalities and main function of the family is to distract the proletariat from their explotation of the bourgeoisie
briefly explain how Marx and Engels argue the bourgeoisie control proletariat families with the ideological function of families
-marxism
parents socialise their children into capitalist, bourgeoisie norms and values through:
* chores and dull jobs that mimick the w/c boring mundane jobs they will have in the future
* saving pocket money will allow them to afford to live in capitalistic society
* healthy eating means they will maintain good health and have less sick days in their jobs
* discipline and authority prepare them not to question the authority and obey their bourgeoisie bossses
briefly explain how Engels argues the bourgeoisie control proletariat families through the inheritance of property
-marxism
in the capitalist society of the UK an ideological belief exists that nuclear families should aspire to get a mortgage and buy their own home.
As it allows the bourgeoisie to control the proletariat by giving them the inability to ever save enough to economicaly challenge the wealth of the ruling class.
briefly explain how Marx and Engels argue the bourgeoisie control proletariat families through making the family a unit of consumption
-marxism
the media builds false needs by;
* families feeling pressure to keep up with material goods/services that their peers have
* bourgeoisie target children in ad’s to then persuade their parents through Pester Power to buy expensive items
briefly explain Zaretsky’s punch bag theory (marxist feminist concept)
he disagrees with Parson’s warm bath theory and instead said the family resembles a punch bag.
This is because capitalism causes stress on proletariat families who then take out their fustration on their children and partner instead of their bourgeoisie bosses
give 3 strengths of marxists theory of the family
- marxism encourages critical thought of not just accepting the way family life is
- identifies power inequalities within society that are reinforced through the family that highlights the controlling force of the family over its members (e.g DV)
- Challenges the notion that the family is universal and natural that is an alternative to positive consensus theories
give 3 weaknesses of marxists theory of the family
- functionalists believe Marxists are too negative and ignore the benefits of the family
- highly deterministic, it reduces family life to matters of economic class and ignores emotional aspects pf the family (e.g. love)
- feminists argue it ignores gender inequalities