Theories Flashcards
What is the Functionalist view of the family?
- n family functions for the greater good of society
- n family makes a massive contribution to the maintenance of social order & stability
- n family plays a major role in the construction & maintenance of an effective economy
- n family also benefits individual members
According to Functionalists, how does the nuclear family benefit individuals?
- adults & children benefit from the emotional wellbeing & satisfaction associated with marriage & family life
- the n family provides social support, identity & security - enables family members to be responsible, law-abiding citizens
Why do Functionals believe the Nuclear Family is crucial to society?
- it’s existence is beneficial & necessary for the harmonious running of society & personal development of individuals
What would Feminists respond with to the Functionalist view of the family?
- n family doesn’t benefit all members - it’s damaging for women
- n family doesn’t create a harmonious society - it ensures the continuation of the patriarchy
- Delphy & Leonard (1992) claim husbands exploit their wives & a women’s role within marriage is to flatter their husbands & provide emotional support with nothing in return
What did G.P. Murdock say about the family?
Four main functions:
- Reproductive
- Sexual
- Educational
- Economic
- These are universal
- These functions benefit all family members & reinforce the commitment
What criticisms are there of Murdock’s theory?
- too ethnocentric & specific to a time + place - not representative
- outdated - fails to take into account modern trends like secularisation & smaller families
- very politically conservative - two parents & heterosexual clearly says there is a ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ way to organise family life
What was the family like in pre-industrial society? (parsons)
- often extended family working & living together on farms
- extended would perform many functions:
1. unit of production - supply their own food etc & trade with other units for what they needed
2. the family equipped members with the basic skills necessary for the families division of labour (primary socialisation)
3. the family maintained the health of its members
4. the family provided welfare for its members e.g caring for elderly
What effects did industrialisation have on the family? (Parsons)
industrial rev. brought five fundamental social changes:
- geographically mobile workforce - extended families split up as younger members moved to cities
- social mobility - more opportunity to improve materially
- relative isolation - less frequent contract with kinships
- ‘specialised agencies’ - n family dependant on
buisnesses for food, clothing etc (consumers) - N family had 2 essential functions:
a. primary socialisation
b. the stabilisation of adult personalities
What did Parsons claim primary socialisation does?
- creates a value consensus (shared norms + values)
- n family = ‘personality factories’ as personalists are MADE not born
- ensures children grow up to become good citizens
- family is a crucial bridge connecting children to wider society
- mothers play an important role in nurturing & socialising children correctly
What is Parsons ‘stabilisation of adult personalities’ theory?
- the family helps members cope with the stresses of modern-day life (kinships less strong)
- nuclear family acts as a ‘warm bath’ for the man, when he comes home from a stressful day at work the family soothes & relaxes him
- the emotional support & opportunity to engage in childs play acts as a safety valve & strengthens social stability in wider society
- marriage is essential to this as females are best suites to being the ‘expressive leader’ (maternal instincts)
How does British sociologist, Fletcher (1988) criticise Parsons?
- Family still has functions - he argues the family performs three unique functions: long-term sexual & emotional satisfaction, raising kids in a stable environment & the provision of a home all family members can return to after work/school
How do interpretivists criticise Parsons view of the family?
- inadequate because it paints a picture of children as ‘empty vessels’ being pumped w/ culture
- Parsons fails to realise this is an ‘over-socialised’ view of children - in reality it’s a two way system
- parents are influenced by their children & parents do not always influence their children to the extent Parson contends
- fails to see the dysfunctional aspects of the family
What are the four stages of Willmott & Young’s ‘March of Progress’?
(agrees with Parson’s in the sense that the family had changed over time)
- pre-industrial family
- Industrial family
- Symmetrical family (current family type)
- Asymmetrical family
change took place through stratified diffusion (MC…WC)
According to Willmott & Young, what are the characteristics of the symmetrical family?
- nuclear structure
- ‘privatised’ - infrequent contact with extended kin
- dual career - both spouses’ incomes essential to standard of living
- egalitarian (shared domestic chores)
- home centred - most leisure time spent in the home
- child centred - children happiness a high priority
How did Harris et al. criticise Willmott & Young?
- the idea that the family is ‘privatised’ is invalid
- although data shows a decline in sibling contact during adulthood, this is only true for single/childless adults
- Once children are born, parents often negotiate relationships with siblings & their parents & the extended mutually supportive family re-emerges
What is the Marxist view of the family?
- the n family doesn’t benefit wider society like Functionalists claim
- n family serves the interests of the bourgeoisie because it promotes capitalist ideology
- ruling-class ideology discourages WC criticism of capitalism & the inequalities generated
What is Engels view of the family?
- argues the monogamous n family only became popular post-industrial rev
- this is because the ruling class encouraged this family structure to protect their property & wealth
- argued monogamous marriage was useful for the bourgeoisie as it conferred legitimacy of children - ensures the correct offspring inherit family fortune
- However, Engels’ speculation has no convincing historical evidence backing it up
What is Zaretsky main view of the family?
He claims that the modern nuclear family mainly benefits capitalism & the ruling class, but at the expense of other members of society
He claims this can be illustrated in three main ways…
According to Zaretsky, what are the three main ways his view is demonstrated?
- Primary socialisation
- family = crucial agent in socializing children into capitalist society
- teaches WC to accept inequality by teaching values + norms which brainwash them into thinking society is equal (conformity, obedience, respect for authority)
- A passive workforce is created to uphold capitalism - Role of family
- rejects Parsons ‘stabilisation…’ & suggests a more sinister role
- argues the family’s real function is to help workers manage their hatred for the capitalist workplace which oppresses them
- n family dampens these feelings as rev would threaten standard of living & families wellbeing
( evidence of this is in the 80s Ford only employed married men as they were less likely to strike than single men) - Consumption
- n family = major unit of consumption (fuels capitalism)
- materialism distracts workers from the issues with capitalism
- Marxists argue that capitalism encourages parents to teach their children the route to happiness is consumerism
- prevents rev as capitalism goes unchallenged as WC too focused on buying the next gadget etc
What are the criticisms of the Marxist view on the family?
- Interpretivists argue Marxists fails to consider individual experiences (as a structuralist theory) as influential - they neglect the positive emotional & social satisfaction people get from the family
- Focuses on the benefits to the economy & the working man’s boss - ignored other benefits to the individual & society
- Zaretsky fails to consider that some parents may resist ruling class ideology by not teaching norms + values of WC culture
- Some people are aware of the pitfalls of capitalism but accept it as a way of life better than Communism
What is the general feminist view of the family?
- Feminists see the family as a negative environment for women & introduced the study of housework + domestic violence into Sociology
- Challenge the idea that family life is based on cooperation, shared interests & love
- Try to show that men obtain greater benefits from families than others
- Different types of feminists disagree over how to overcome the patriarchy
What are the different types of Feminists?
- Liberal
- Radical
- Marxist
- Difference
How do Liberal Feminists respond to the ‘March of Progress’?
they agree that things are gradually improving to be more egalitarian
- women’s oppression gradually being overcome
- Changes in the law (Sex Discrimination Act 1975)
- Changes in attitudes
However, they do contend that to achieve greater equality, further reforms & changes in socialisation patterns of children are necessary
What does Liberal Feminist, Oakley, say about the family?
Oakley (1974-now)
- criticised ‘malestream sociology’ pre-70s
- “men are privileged and will not give this up” (domestic labour)
- gender inequality in family = a product of discrimination by individuals & heads of institutions (not embedded in the social structure of society)
- discrimination based on ignorance, prejudice & a mistaken view on the biogenetic difference in gender