Theoretical Foundations - Session #2 Flashcards
Welcome back…
…to our tutor certification training on Theoretical Foundations of tutoring.
Did anyone do anything exciting since our last meeting? [allow responses] Fantastic!
So today, we’ll be working our way through the second of our two training sessions for the course. Just like with…
…the 1st session of 2 weeks ago, we have plenty to cover, so we should probably get going here…
Slide: Theoretical Foundations, Session #2 Overview
Here is just a quick rundown of our agenda items today…
We’ll begin with a brief overview of…
…last session’s training material, recapping the highlights of andragogy, constructivism, the ZPD, and the Socratic method of questioning
As far as the presentations are concerned…
…I want to remind you all that I have randomly chosen the order in which everyone will present.
[if necessary]…We may not get to everyone with time for all presentations, but again, the presentation order has been chosen completely at random…
Hopefully, you have all come prepared with your presentations notes and materials…I’m very excited to see the results of all that hard work!
Slide: Session #1 Review
Let’s begin with…
…a bit of review from training session #1. Hopefully you remember the topics listed here. Let’s begin with…
Slide: Andragogy Review
So first off, can anyone remind us of the definition of andragogy we used during last session? Perhaps you could define it in light of what it is expressly is NOT? [allow responses]
Right: We went with this fairly simple definition here: Andragogy is the theory and approach of teaching adult learners.” It is expressly not “Pedagogy” the best practice for teaching child learners, as we covered in detailed contrast last time.
And for some quick bonus points, who can remember the name of the individual who gave the world of educational philosophy it’s first systematic theory of andragogy?
“That’s right! It WAS Malcolm Knowles. Knowles was famous for identifying six key traits of adult learners, which he believe could reasonably be assumed of most of them.
Let’s try to name and call out as many of those as possible from before, WITHOUT looking at your notes…
Fantastic! We remember our “Knowles-in-a-nutshell” discussion of last session. Good memories, all! To restate the full list of assumptions, we have…
…The need to know - whereby adult learners have a natural desire to understand why what they are learning is important, not just how concepts are related to/build on one-another, but how they are relevant to their life goals.
Additionally, we have the self-concept -
…which states that adults have an independent perception of themselves as learners, and that they benefit most when educators make the promotions of their independent learning a high priority.
Next was the learner’s prior experience -
…as adult learners have much more life experience to draw from, they are not only better equipped for mutual, peer-to-peer collaborative learning,
but they are more “heterogeneous” than child learners and so benefit from highly personalized instruction.
After that came the readiness to learn -
- The readiness/eagerness of adult learners to advance their understanding is based more on their engagement than on their biological and psychological development.
That engagement is best facilitated when we show how what they are learning is relevant to their life goals.
Next was the orientation to learning -
Adult learners are task-oriented more than subject-oriented, so they benefit from practical exercises and those applications can actually help cement both interest in the material and understanding of it.
Finally, there was the motivation to learning -
Adults are far more internally driven to take on new challenges in education than children. Their drive to learn comes from within, from desires, goals, dreams and passions.
It helps us engage them when we determine which specific internal motivations a given tutoring student has.
Excellent work everyone! Let’s turn now to the second of our three major topics from Session #1:
Slide: Constructivism Review
Who can remember the basic idea behind the theory of constructivism in the philosophy and science of education? [allow for responses]
Great job! One definition that covers all the general principles of the theory would be something like this:
[read definition] - in short, learning is an active building process, with experiences, both old and new, serving as the building blocks.
Again, definitions are better when contrasted against what the term does NOT mean…constructivism is emphatically NOT traditionalistic teaching, which emphasizes the mere transfer or exchange of info from those in-the-know to those who aren’t.
Slide: ZPD Review
Awesome. What about the Zone of Proximal Development?
What does that model show about how humans acquire knowledge? Bonus points if you can identify the originator of that theory, as well? [allow for responses]
Spot on! Just as we discussed last time…
… the ZPD is the intellectual region between what learners can do on their own, with no assistance, and what they cannot yet complete, even with assistance.
We also talked in that module about the importance of scaffolding. What is scaffolding as we defined it last time?
Right! Scaffolding is the practice of breaking content into manageable chunks, letting the students handle the chunks on their own that are in their ability to do by themselves with no assistance, and providing guidance for those chunks in their ZPD.
We also mentioned how it is in the ZPD that the student is most likely to feel what…?
…Exactly! Cognitive disequilibrium, that sense of unease when confronted with new experiences that don’t easily fit into establish “schema” or ways of understanding the world.
Finally, can anyone recall why we it was that we argued that constructivism and the ZPD can help us understand how to become more effective tutors?
Right. Adult learners are likely to favor constructivist approaches to learning, and tutoring is somewhat inherently constructivist (more-so than classroom teaching).
We also regularly encounter students who are occupying their ZPD. So helping them navigating that gulf between what students can do themselves and what they can do with appropriate guidance is a role that tutors can play.
Slide: Socratic Method of Questioning Review
“Alright! Finally, let’s think back on last session and consider: What was Socratic questioning again?”
Perfect! Key components of the definition included the concept of “open-endedness” in questioning, “guidance from the side”, and the idea that there are many types of socratic questions, all motivated by different goals in getting the student to do metacognitive thinking. What were those different types of Socratic Questions?
Right! We had…
[read list of types on the slide]
Indeed, these are all different flavors of socratic question, that we, like socrates, can invoke in order to keep the student actively engaged and actively analyzing their own thought-processes.
Slide: Presentations, Group 1
Great work with that review. Hopefully, the juices are flowing!
Let’s go ahead and move into our first round of presentations together…
Post-first round presentations
Okay, terrific work, folks! That was a really insightful slew of first presentations, and I hope that everyone got as much out of them as I know did.
Alright. I think we’ve earned our first break!
Welcome back from the break, everyone! I want to start…
…by thanking the first group of presenters for all the insight and effort that they poured into their work, sharing all that valuable information with us.
We are going to switch gears away from presentations for moment…
…and get into the first of two modules for this session - this one covers “Tutoring as an Interpersonal Communication Process”
One theme I’m sure everyone noticed…
…in the original orientation training was that of how we as tutors can become better communicators, both in terms of communicating academic concepts and in terms of supporting students on a more holistic, human level.
This module aims to…
…get into both in far more detail than in the orientation training class.
Purpose: And while much of what this lesson contains is fairly common sensical from the standpoint of effective communication in general, we cover this topic to encourage you to think about how to make communication principles actionable in the tutoring environment.
So without any more ado, let’s crack in. As we are all aware…
… the recipe for effective communication requires two ingredients. It requires an active listener, and an effective speaker, with each participant playing each role in turn.
Let’s start by looking at some strategies for playing the first role, that of an active listener in tutoring sessions.
We start with this clever quote here from…
…ancient Roman stoic philosopher Epictetus, who argues that “We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak.”
His figurative point is well taken: effective and active listening is the primary foundation of fruitful communication: we can communicate without speech; there can be none without listening
Now I read this and think “Okay, Epictetus. That’s clever and largely true. But…
…what are some specific active listening strategies that I can employ?” Epictetus said very little about that, but fortunately, we have some guidance from interpersonal communication research/literature. So what are actionable tips to listen actively and effectively?
Well first off, before any listening is attempted…
(Minimizing Distractions)
…we must establish the proper conditions for good listening in the first place. This means…
Minimizing distractions in the learning space. Does anyone have tempting distractions that they personally struggle with in their life of study?