Theodoric and Clovis Flashcards
How can we evaluate successor states being ‘Roman’?
In ideology and institutions.
What are the three ideological aspects of being Roman?
- Superiority complex
- Spiritual and physical
- Rationality
Outline the Roman superiority complex:
Romans saw themselves as being divinely supported, as the most successful and ‘Godly/natural’ order.
Outline the spiritual and physical ideological aspect of being Roman:
Humans bridge the gap between spiritual and physical. They have bodies but also souls: Romans are superior due to their social order fostering rational thought.
What was the defining difference in Greco-Roman thought between civilised and barbarous people?
Ideology and rationality
How can we exemplify the Roman ideology?
In the various modal verbs of Latin, which account for time and place, recipient and giver, status of conversationalists etc.
What must be noted about the benefits of Roman society?
Largely, benefits such as a wholesome education were only available to Roman elites, until Christianisation which suggested all were equal under God.
What are the three institutional aspects of being Roman?
Large-scale taxation, Legal systems and centralisation, Local government and bureaucracy.
What were the three responses successor states had to already existing Roman institutions?
- use, 2. adapt, 3. destroy and replace.
Outline the Roman large-scale taxation system:
Supported the empire and complex trading networks, in particular aided the standing army (something unfounded in successor states due to complexity).
outline the Roman legal systems and centralisation:
Highlighted the importance of property in Imperial elites empire-wide. Everyone followed the same comprehensive legal structures, issues were often solved via the emperor or a representative.
Outline Roman local government and bureaucracy:
A significant system of patronage existed between bureaucrats-government-landowners. Bureaucrats are paid in rights and privileges not money. Empire is split into city states with urban administration and rural dependents.
Are successor states in awe of Roman society?
In Theodoric’s letter to Anastasius we could say yes. He claimed to be romanised due to living in Constantinople for a decade.
How did Theodoric perceive himself as Roman?
He saw his ‘Roman-ness’ not as deriving from Romans, but from God. Thus he saw himself as equal to Romans.
What three steps were there to establishing a successor state?
- Elimination of rival leaders, 2. Use of Roman institutions, 3. Mirroring of Roman ideologies.
How did successor states eliminate rival leaders?
- There were no well established monarchical traditions. 2. There were attempts at military power bases with standing armies.
- Eradication of family members as potential threats.
- Marriage alliances to strengthen positions.
How did successor states adopt Roman taxation institutions?
They distributed wealth across state elites, adopting a patronage system.
How did successor states adopt Roman law institutions?
There was a focus on royal court as elites travelled to the king to solve issues. This granted informal and practical power to the king.
How did successor states use kingship and religion to become Roman?
Kings appointed their own bishops and councils due to Christianity diversifying by region
How did successor states mirror Roman ideologies?
Through assimilating land owning elites into the new order. This was a political deal which required much appeasement of followers and Roman elites.
When was the disappearance of Romanised society?
Around 600 A.D.
How ‘Roman’ was Theodoric’s ostrogothic Italy?
Practically, very. However Roman’s believed they were divinely supported, and Theodoric practised ‘Aryan heresy’- how could he claim to be divinely supported with such an ideological difference.
How ‘Roman’ was Clovis’ Francia?
Very. Whilst he didn’t purposely adopt Roman characteristics, in his consolidation of power he inadvertently did so. He was considered to be the true Roman successor and thus held the ideological claim Theodoric did not.
What was Aryan heresy?
No belief in the Holy Trinity in which Jesus is both Divine and Mortal, merely Divine. The Holy Trinity was the basis of Catholic doctrine.