Theme 4 Religious Langauge Flashcards

1
Q

What is the main issue with religious language?

A

Whether religious language is meaningful or meaningless, given that it discusses non-empirical, often transcendent concepts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Verification Principle

A

states that a statement is only meaningful if it can be verified through sense experience or is a tautology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What challenge does the Verification Principle pose to religious language?

A

Religious statements, like “God exists,” cannot be empirically verified, so according to this principle, they would be considered meaningless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who are the main proponents of the Verification Principle?

A

A.J. Ayer and the Logical Positivists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the Falsification Principle?

A

A statement is meaningful only if it can be proven false by empirical evidence. If no evidence can count against it, the statement is meaningless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define Cognitive Language

A

Language that can be assessed as true or false, often associated with factual claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define Cognitive Language

A

Language that can be assessed as true or false, often associated with factual claims.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Non-Cognitive Language

A

Language that expresses feelings or attitudes rather than factual statements; often subjective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who was Anthony Flew and what was his view

A

Introduced the Falsification Principle, arguing that for religious claims to be meaningful, they must be falsifiable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was The University Debate

A

The discussion among scholars about the meaningfulness of religious language, particularly the tension between cognitive and non-cognitive approaches, and whether religious statements hold objective truth or subjective meaning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which 3 key scholars were part of the university debate

A

Basil Mitchell, Antony flew, RM Hare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What analogy does flew use?

A

Two explorers in a jungle and beat whether there is a Gardner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What analogy does RM Hare use

A

The lunatic who believes all the dons are out to kill him

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What analogy does Basil Mitchell use

A

The strange who meets the resistance fight who claims he is fighting in his side

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does warburton apply the falsification to religious language ?

A

Warburton applies the falsification principle to religious language, arguing that many religious statements are vague and cannot be definitively proven false. This challenges their meaningfulness, as claims like “God loves everyone” cannot be easily tested against evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Thomas Aquinas rogue about religious language

A

Aquinas argued that we can speak about God using analogies. While human language is limited, we can describe God in terms of qualities that we understand (like goodness or wisdom), recognizing that these qualities exist in a greater, perfect form in God.

17
Q

What did Ian Ramsey argue

A

Ramsey argued that religious language arises from human experience of the divine. It is not just a set of statements but is rooted in personal encounters and relationships with God, making it more meaningful to believers.