THEFT Flashcards
rights of the owner
change it
sell it
consume it
use it
give it away
destroy it
hire it out
appropriation
assuming the rights of the owner
property
real property
money
tangible property
things in action
personal property
dishonesty
doesn’t take into account motive
you look at what isn’t dishonest and go from there
ways someone isn’t dishonest
S.2(1) A&B&C
A- if they believe they have the legal right to appropriate
B- if they believe they would of consented
C- the person whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps
r v robinson
defendant was not dishonest
outlined S.2(1) A
r v small
no requirement for the defendant belief to be reasonable (not dishonest)
S.2(1)C
ivy v casinos
subjective test- what did the defendant believe
objective test- would reasonable person do the same
intention to permanently deprive
intending to not give the exact thing back
r v velumyl
doesn’t matter that D intended to replace exact value or money, he still took it and spent it before replacing it therefore he permanently deprived
dpp v lavender
moved the door to the council flat to another, counted as intention to permanently deprive
r v lloyd
D worked at a cinema took a film to copy it and brought it back in the same condition before the next screening. allegations were quashed
r v easom
not guilty of theft
he went though someone’s back in the cinema, he didn’t take anything. he had conditional theft which is not enough
conditional theft
will take if there’s something worth taking
r v kelly & lindsay
body parts are not property, but were in this case