Theft Flashcards
What is the definition of Theft and the Section?
“A person is guilty of theft if he/she dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it.”
Theft Act Section 1 – Theft Act 1968
Points to Prove for Theft
- Dishonestly
- Appropriates
- Property
- Belonging to Another
Intention to permanently deprive the other of it.
What is Property?
- Money
- Property real or personal
- Including in action and other intangible property
Does not include: Mushrooms (On wild or any Land), Flowers, Fruit or Foliage of a plant growing wild, unless picked for sale
What is the legal definition of Dishonesty? Is there any case law? What is the dishonesty test?
- No Dishonesty: No THEFT
There is no actual statute definition of theft.
R vs Ghosh – Study
Ivey vs Genting Casinos – Study
- Was the act the kind that an ordinary decent person (the everyday Mr Smith) would consider to be dishonest. (The Objective test?)
Did the accused have realised that what he was doing by the above standards, dishonest. (The Subjective test?) Overruled by Ivey vs Genting Casinos.
What is the legal definition of appropriation?
- Any assumptions of the rights of an owner, however they have come by the property and includes assuming of a right to it by keeping it or dealing with it as owner.
- It is not where property has been transferred to a person acting in good faith and gives value.
Example: Swapping Price Labels is appropriation.
Property can be appropriated on more than one occasion and be a continuing act.
What is the legal definition of “Belonging to another”?
- Property must belong to someone.
- No Owner = No theft.
- A person with a legal obligation.
Similarly, if a person gets another person property by mistake and is under a legal, obligation to make restoration (return) the property or any proceeds, the property shall be regarded as belonging to person entitled to restoration.
What is the legal definition of “Permanently Depriving”?
Intention to Permanently deprive
- If a person treats property as his own…
- Where a person parts with property (of another) under a condition for its return which he may not be able to perform.
What is the definition of Abstracting Electricity? and Under what Section?
“A person who Dishonestly uses without due authority or dishonestly cause to be wasted or diverted any electricity commits an offence”
Abstracting Electricity – Section 13 Theft Act – 1968
What are the points to prove for Abstracting Electricity?
Without due Authority: Have not received consent from the owner.
Wasted: Wasted as in turn on someone else’s electric and leave it.
Diverted: From mains or substations.
What is the legal definition of TWOC? And the Section from the Theft Act?
“A Person commits offence if they take a conveyance,
Without owners’ consent or other lawful authority
For own or another’s use
Or knowing it was so taken
Drives it or allows themselves to be carried in or on it”
Taking Without Owners Consent Section 12 (1) Theft Act 1968
What are the Points to Prove for the Offence of TWOC?
- Without Consent of Owner/Lawful Consent
- Took a Conveyance
- For his or Another’s use
What is the legal definition of Conveyance?
Anything constructed or adapted for the carriage of persons whether by land, water or air.
What is the meaning of “Take”?
- Is taken if it is moved from its previous position.
- Doesn’t matter how far you move it. (as small as a 1 cm)
Starting the engine is not enough, it has to be moved.
What does it mean by “Consent of Owner”
- Relates to the permission
- Must be given freely and honestly (No threat or force)
Must have an honestly held belief to take the conveyance.
Who has “Lawful Authority”?
- Police
- Border Agency
- Bailiffs
Law Enforcement Agency with Justification