The Second Civil War Flashcards
How did the parliamentarian side change by 1646?
- the twin parliamentary factions have been labelled political Presbyterians and political independents
Who were the key leaders of the political Presbyterians?
Denzil holles + Philip Stapleton
What were the key ideas of the political Presbyterians?
- Charles should be given the benefit of the doubt and returned to parliament now that the evil councillors were out of the way
- the NMA was a hotbed for radicals + too expensive to maintain
-generally conservative in social and political views - willing to accept settlement on minimal terms
- supported the Presbyterian church to support social revolution
Who were the key figures in the political independents?
-Henry ireton and Oliver Cromwell
What were the key ideas of political independents?
- more radical in nature
- disliked the authoritarianism of Scottish Presbyterianism
- wanted considerable measures of religious toleration
- allied with the NMA - seen as security against Charles
- liberty of conscience
What key leaders died by 1644?
- john hampden
- john pym
How did the old peace party begin to see Presbyterianism?
- as a way to bring the war to an end
How long did the war and peace party last?
- 1642-44
Who were the most influential group in parliament by 1646?
- political Presbyterians
- most of the country would have favoured them because of their peace policy
- in 1646, if Charles had accepted reasonable terms presented to him by the political Presbyterians,then the political independents and NMA would have gone along with the agreement
What were the July 1646 Newcastle propositions?
- presented by the political Presbyterians
- main features :
- religion = Charles was to accept the establishment of Presbyterianism in England for 3 years
- militia = Parliament was to control the militia (armed forces) for 20 years.
- Parliament = the triennial act was so remain, guaranteeing regular parliaments as a limit on the power of the monarch
- royalists = only 58 royalists were not to be pardoned - thus encouraging others to accept defeat
What was Charles’ response to the Newcastle propositions?
- he stalled
- had no intention to agree with them - but he did not say this directly in order to allow divisions among his opponents to develop
- settlement was hampered by parliament’s political divisions ; which were deepened by religious differences
- winter of 1646-7 - further instability was created when the political Presbyterians tried to get the king to agree to a revised, more lenient version of the new castle propositions - also sought to impose:
-demobilising the NMA but keeping a smaller force to go to Ireland to crush the Irish catholics - creating an alternative ‘safe’ army based on the London trained bands
What was the Decleration of dislike?
- 1647 - denzil holles’ abuse of the NMA
- argued NMA were “enemies of the state”
- problem of parliament - owed the army £3 million
- politicised the NMA
What was the NMA’s response to the declaration of dislike?
- the NMA faced 2 main issues:
-had £3 million owed by parliament (arrears) + they were disbanded before this money was paid - possibility of being charged with offensives committed during the war - as parliament had not passed an indemnity act
- NMA elected speakers to get their points across + engage in political discussions after the Decleration of dislike (elected agitators) - would help lead the NMA to reach a settlement
When did the NMA kidnap Charles ?
- June 1647 by radical cornet Joyce
- this made the NMA significant in the politics of settlement
What was the June 1647 humble remonstrance?
- produced by the NMA
- declared that they would not disband until their grievances were met - included the indemnity + removal of the Presbyterian faction
- army began a slow march towards London to put pressure on their enemies in Parliament
How did Charles view on Presbyterians?
- liked the social conservatism of Presbyterianism
-understood that the longer he held out to find a settlement, divisions in parliament would worsen - whilst he disliked the idea of a single national Presbyterian church - he did see the need for a framework of unity
What was the July 1647 heads of proposals?
- main points:
- reform parliamentary representation
- parliamentary control of the army and navy
- parliamentary appointment of great officers of state for ten years
- religious settlement that maintained the national church with bishops, but no coercive power
- act of oblivion that exempted only a few royalists from punishment
Why was the NMA’s control of Charles significant?
- allowed them to negotiate directly with him and present their own settlement plan
- by negotiating with both the king and parliament during the heads of proposals - ireton and Cromwell showed their desire for an essentially moderate settlement - their willingness to compromise with Charles divided the army
What was the October 1647 agreement of the people?
- associated with the NMA and the levellers
- called for a biennial parliament
- Called for free and fair elections + full male enfranchisement
When were the Putney debates?
- October - November 1647
Who attended the Putney debates?
- fairfax, Cromwell, and ireton (grandees)
- radical levellers : Thomas rainsborough
What was discussed at the Putney debates?
- discussed a new constitution for England - ireton proposed the heads of proposals as a less radical settlement than the agreement of the people
What was Charles’ response to what was discussed at the Putney debates?
- he fled to the Isle of Wight in November 1647 mistakenly believing he had support there but actually ended up in the custody of parliamentarian supporters
- did not want to accept defeat at the hands of parliament
- terrified of the rise of the levellers