Political Divisions: The Personal Rule And The Short Parliament Flashcards
What led to the personal rule from 1629 onwards?
- the collapse in the relationship between Charles and the political nation by 1629
- Charles’ belief in the divine right to rule
Why was Charles’ personal rule problematic?
- there wasn’t a parliament to govern, so the privy council gained even greater importance
- his personal rule led to opposition and discontent in England, Scotland and Ireland
Who were some of the dominant figures in the privy council?
- sir Richard Weston
- William laud
- William juxon
What were the two prerogative courts used to enforce Charles’ will?
- court of star chamber - made up of privy councillors selected by the monarch
- court of high commission - chief court under the church used by laud to enforce conformity
How much was Charles in debt by 1629?
- £2 million
How were savings achieved at the beginning of personal rule?
- securing peace with France (1629) -treaty of Susa
- securing peace with Spain (1630) - treaty of Madrid
- Weston’s reform of court finance in order to lower the costs of running Charles’ courts
- both measures had negative political consequences - Charles’ withdraw from the thirty years war was opposed by many, especially the puritans who regarded the destruction of Catholicism as a crusade
How did custom duties help to raise revenue?
- continued the collection of T+P - between 1631-35, this form of income brought Charles £270,000 a year
- 1635- a new book of rates updated the amount paid on goods as customs duty to be more in line with market value (due to inflation)
- by end of 1630s - custom duties had risen to £425,000 a year = providing a great source of income
Ho did feudal dues help to raise revenue?
- crown had the right to run any estate inherited by an heir under 21 years old
-during personal rule, income from warship increased by a third to about £75,000 a year
How did monopolies raise revenue?
- loophole in the monopoly act allowed grants to corporations - eg the granting of the monopoly for soap to a group of catholics (popish soap)
- earned Charles £33,000
How did recusancy fines raise revenue?
- income from from these fines increased from £5300 in 1620s to £26,900 in 1634
How did distraint from knighthood increase income?
- anyone holding land with an income of £40 per year or more who had not yet received a knighthood at Charles’ coronation was find
- Charles had raised nearly £175,000 by 1635 this way
What other fines helped Charles increase revenue?
- forest fines - fines for any landowners accused of encroaching on areas of royal forests, Charles used dubious maps and documents to imposes fines on major landowners
- land titles - fines imposed on those who rented land from the crown but lacked a clear title to the land or could not prove continuous occupation for the next 60 years
- enclosure fines - fines imposed on those who had illegally enclosed or closed off common land
What was fiscal feudalism ?
- the methods Charles used to increase income through royal prerogative
How much did Charles gain from exploiting his prerogative ?
- his annual income during personal rule was raised from £600,000 to £900,000
Why did forest fines prove to be problematic ?
- only raised £3,667 - at the great cost of alienating landowners
- many people depending on forest lands as part of their income ; provided timber etc
- between 1626-32 - riots in places like Gloucestershire
Who was William Noy and what was he tasked with?
- digging through forgotten English laws and find loopholes to enable Charles to raise income
What was ship money ?
- prerogative form of income levied in times of emergency to fund the navy
When was ship money levied in coastal towns and counties?
August 1635 + extended to inland counties and levied annually until 1639
How much did ship money raise?
- average of £200,000 a year
What was Charles’ aim?
- to make England a serious blue water power
What was sovereign of the seas in August 1634?
- personal initiative from Charles to build a large ship - bolster English crown
What was the collection rate for ship money?
- between 1643-38 - 90% of ship money demanded pay
What was the 1637 hampden case?
- opposition to ship money collection
- had previously been imprisoned for refusing to pay the forced loan in 1626 -
- stood for trial due to his refusal to pay ship money
What were the consequences of the 1637 hampden case?
- 5 out of the 12 judges gave verdict against the crown
- made it possible for opposition against Charles to become more organised and determined
- key turning point during personal rule