the reality of prisons Flashcards
The reality of life within our prisons
Calls for Justice overhaul as new figures reveal scale of overcrowding” Left Foot Forward, 13th January 2020
“Winchester Prison: Report highlights rise in violence and self harm.” BBC, 7th January 2020
“Bedford prison ‘100%’ to blame for officer death, says father.” 2nd Jan 2020
“HMP Berwyn: Systemic failure in prison spice death.” BBC, November 2020
“Prison conditions ‘most disturbing ever seen’ with staff now accustomed to jails not fit for 21st century, watchdog says.” The Independent, July 2018
“Men’s prison conditions so ‘degrading’ inmates ‘crunch cockroaches underfoot’ warns watchdog.” The Independent, July 2017
“Are prisons in England and Wales facing a meltdown?” The Guardian, 17th February 2018
Prison Reform Trust
‘The state of our prisons is a fair measure of our society.’
How did we get here? Economic failings
- An obvious place to begin when considering the prison crisis, is the impact of austerity and the reduction of budget
- In 2010, the newly coalition government were desperate for places to save money – and very quickly the CJS became an obvious target
- Since 2010/11, the Justice budget, encompassing prisons, probation and the legal system has seen cuts of 40%
- The monetary value of this has been huge, with a budget of £9.3bn in 2010/11 to £5.6bn in 2019/2020
- Prisons themselves have seen cuts of 22% within this time, with more significant budget cuts within the next two years planned
- Justice has seen the most brutal cuts within the last decade, with analysts suggesting that without an input of some money the prisons sector will move from “repeated crisis to a full blown emergency.”
How did we get here? Political failings
- Politics and prison have a long and complicated history with current politics focusing on the idea of making prisons more secure, increasing sentences for those with gang links or those convicted of specific offences
- David Gauke and Rory Stewart, while having admirable efforts and ideals towards prisons (Stewart especially) have fallen into the trap of ‘back to basics.” prisons
Repackaged ‘making prison work’
- The idea of ‘back to basics’ focuses predominately on the old idas of ‘prison works’
- This rhetoric focuses on deterrence and punishment – that being imprisoned, and the removal of liberty is enough to deter others from offending
- We know this isn’t sufficient and that efforts should be placed into education, healthcare and rehabilitation – and yet, there has been no money for this but £14m for a ‘gang crackdown’…
How did we get here? Legal failings
- To understand how we got here, a concept of moral panic requires understanding
- First coined by the sociologist Stanley Cohen, it refers to something or someone being perceived as a threat to social norms and the interests of social cohesion
- Following this perception, media symbolic use spreads this to society using representation of the threat and the authorities respond to the threat, legitimatizing it = moral panic (simply)
How did a three-year-old lead to a rise in prison overcrowding?
- In 1993, James Bulger was tortured and murdered by two-10- year old boys, and the resulting outcry goes some way to understanding the current situation we face within the justice system
- Despite child homicide being a rare occurrence, the reporting and hysteria followed revealed an underlying fear in our communities and influenced sentencing
Sentencing
- Moving from the concept of moral panic, the way in which we sentence has seen dramatic change and therefore impacted the way in which our prisons are required to operate
- in 2017, the amount of people dealt with by the courts was the lowest since 1970, but the amount of people convicted for indictable offences and the length of sentences incresed
- First time offenders are now far more likely (52%) to be convicted than cautioned, whereas only 22% would have been convicted 22 years ago
Why has this happened?
- The rise in the average sentences has happened in part due to more people being charged with historic sexual offences which drives up the average
- But with the use of prison as a first resort (rather than a last resort for the most serious offences) demonstrates the attitudes of judges to imprison first
- Consider the use of community sentences and whether they are available, funded or applicable to the crime?
Who is in prison?
- Last week we touched on the idea that a significant proportion for those currently incarcerated are there following multiple convictions
- Regardless of the opinions of reformers, current sentencing data shows that 70% of sentences are for those with 7+ convictions
- Therefore, our changes to sentencing would result in removing or changing our attitude to how we treat prolific offenders
Are prolific offenders dangerous
- When considering changing the amount and type of people we imprison requires a discussion on the type of person we ‘want’ within our society (a problematic conversation within itself)
- The offenders who make up our prolific offenders are typically nonviolent offenders
- Offenders who have committed the most serious offences, considered to be 15 or less within this study account for the majority of the violent or sexual offences
Should prison be for the violent?
- If we align ourselves with some popular aims of prison, we typically fall on the idea that custody should be protectional
- Of the 59,000 people sentenced to prison within 2018, 69% of those had committed a non-violent crime
- The majority of our prisoners are there for non violent crimes, for petty crimes and for repeat offending
- Which crimes should result in custody?
A quick not on reoffending
- Prison is evidently not working – for adult males, the reoffending rate is 48%, for women 58%, and for children 65% all within a year of release
- If short sentences are used, then the rates of reoffending rise dramatically – to 64%, 73% and 70% respectively
- The use of short sentences > community orders is disastrous, with Community order being far more effective at reducing reoffending
The main issues
- Drugs
- Self Harm
- Self Inflicted Deaths
- Mental Health
- Physical Conditions
- Violence
- Understaffing
- Overcrowding
How bad is it really?
- Between 2012/2013 – 2017/2018, when using random drugs tests, the rate of positive tests rose to 50% from between 7-10%
- These tests were also used for ‘traditional’ drugs such as opiates and cannabis
- However, the issues we’re seeing the majority of the time are focused on two areas
- Psychoactive substances
- Drugs getting into prisons
• Modern psychoactive substances (MPS)
- More commonly known as Spice, Mamba etc these are new substances which are meant to mimic the effects of traditional drugs have absolutely swamped UK prisons
• Spice has recently become the drug of choice within prisons, accounting for around 60-90% of drug use within (Centre for Social Justice, 2015, HMIP)
• The most persistent reasons for the use of synthetic cannaboids in prisons are boredom, escapism, relaxation and additions
The prison regime and use of spice
- Walker, 2015 concluded that motivations for the use of cannabinoids within prisons included to ‘clear their mind’ ‘manipulate time’ and ‘escape the confines of prison life’
- A huge concern with the use of MPS, is the effect it then has on both the regime and safety within the prison
- For the first time, the 2014/2015 prison report from HMIP recognized the link between consumption and a rise in serious assaults - either through influence or bullying
MPS and mental health
- Synthetic cannabinoids have been known to trigger mental health issues within those who use it – either triggering existing MH issues or causing new ones
- The effects of MPS within the regime are pronounced with both Castellanos et al (20011) and prison guards reporting that prisoners exert acts of violence, self harm and hallucinations
- This has included prisoners stabbing officers with a key, and officers reporting that “psychologically, they’ve changed these lads.”