The Public Voice of Radio Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Title Slide

A

The Public Voice of Radio

By John Durham Peters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Slide 2: Summary

A

With the approach of the Interstate Commerce act, ICC, The Mann-Elkins Act & Transportation Act - radio signal was a concern regarding confidentiality & who was listening in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Slide 3: Major Arguments

A
  • Omnipresent quality of radio signal a defect, saying(more or less to me, complaining) that dialogue was a legitimate form of communication.
  • Radio telephone messages can never be a secret due to the inability to bar unintended recipients - that confidentiality part I mentions in the beginning
  • The discovery of radio became as an agency of broadcast – household music box, said David Sarnoff
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Slide 3: Major Arguments Cont.

A
  • With that being said, he viewed as an opportunity VS an obstacle - now realize what could be the main purpose of new technology
  • Radio a common carrier or something else? Common carraige a category that included shipping lines, elevators, & railroads; gave ICC jurisdiction over common carriers - ceded as ‘natural monopoly’ - need steve’s help
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Slide 4: Major Arguments Cont.

A
  • Broadcasting lacked “the boy in the blue uniform who rang the door bell and brings the msg itself”; Saw that broadcasting made no effort to ensure delivery.
  • Broadcasting - deformed communication circuit since transmission of intelligence was left to chance - needing to set up properly attuned.
  • FCC comes in w/ Comm act of 1934: deemed person engaged in radio broadcasting not common carrier; BUT careful what you say or you’ll answer to FCC.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Slide 5: Questions

A
  1. ) How could we have approached the ‘party line’ issue? When the goal was a person-to-person connection
  2. ) Do you agree with Hoover’s means, being against the wireless person-to-person contact? - it does seem hopeless when again trying for that private convo.
  3. ) Should the FCC have bud in? - Yes, need to have some control, especially if out to the public.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly