Final for CT&S Flashcards
The problematic
Rich media will make poor democracy?
How media giants can control the global market
Deregulation of media ownership, privatization in European & Aisan markets & new communication technologies
*Horizontal integration
Control a significant slice of specific media sectors
*Neoliberalism
“Free market”; deregulation; see more privatization in media
Cultural Imperialism vs Cultural Protectionism
Cultural Imperialism - to do w/ empire; to a certain degree; the colonizers
Cultural Protectionism - Quotas; Gov’t uses polocies to protect culture; ex) Tawain only allow 20 movies to import bc they worry.
The global commercial media system is radical in the following aspects
Respect no tradition or custom, since it is profit-oriented.
However, politically it is quite conservative: preserve is a status quo, dont challenge the capitalist economic structure (unequal social relations)
The press as the Fourth Estate
Constantly accused of dominating markets, dumbing down the news to plump up the bottom line & forcing U.S. content on world audiences.
More regulation of media is NOT in the public interest
Free-market ideology, only free competitionwill create freer marketplace of ideas
- Telecommunication Acts of 1996
- Clear Channel’s domincation of radio
- Represented a major change in American telecommunication law since internet as included in broadcasting and spectrum allotmen.
- Clear Channel maintains a similar chokehold on live music in almost every city in America; Controls so much, but why if media is public?
History/story of Clearn Channel reaches 200 million ppl, more than 70% of the Amer. ppl
They own 1,225 stations within the U.S., around 11% overall.
Broadcast from at least 200 more stations abroad, and they own or control more live-music venues than any other company.
Clear Channel build its empire not from
new franchises, but by local operations
Music business is ‘symbiosis’ between radio stations & music talents
Clear Channel wants you to identify with the brand so fully that you don’t recognize it as a brand at all but rather as yourself
The debate over radio
The airwave is a provate property or public resources
Google changed the concept of time
make our past “present and permanent; radical notion for a medium usually defined by its ability to constantly update itself
Archives & privacy
Kahle & Gilliat began the process of archiving web into a big permanent album.
Privacy & security will trample by the obscure internet archive & mainstream google
*Weblog
self-published e-mail journals; transform passive audience to participatory public
*Mass communication
Public communication carefully information by the media giants -> individual expression of a worldwide scale
R.Blood quotes
“Weblogs are no panacea for the crippling effects of a media-saturated culture but they are one antidote”
R. Williams
TV is not just pictures, but “flow”(flood of images); TV & drama in built into our daily life
Constant TV households
Homes which tv is on most of the time
Who watches more?
Japs watch more tv than Amer & Amer more than Western Europeans
Marshal McLuhan says technology
is an extension of man/humankind; ambivalent = mixed
Unlimmited media, economic expansion, individual desire
Modern society helps us cultivate our desires
Culture of unlimmited
keep helping us with our imagination of our images
Table 9-1 Distinguishing features of new media/formats
1) Multimedia: Web
2) Audience Participation: Web, & Townhalls
3) Caller Feedback: Web, Townhalls, Call-in TV, & Radio
4) Visuals: Web, Townhalls, Call-in TV, & TV
5) Audio: Web, Townhalls, Call-in TV, Talk Radio, &TV
Civic relevance of new media/formats
1) Political entertainment TV
2) Political talk radio
3) Political call-in-TV
4) Electronic townhall forum
5) Internet
The consequence of a fragmented speech market
Negative dark side; info can be filtered - w/ this power, then can have thier own kind of media (what we want).
Daily me generation
?
New communication technologies make self-segregation possible
More & louder echoes of their own voices
*Fairness Doctrine
Broadcast; share different views to be fair; Group