The Problem Of Evil Flashcards
Evidential problem of evil
> based on empiricism - seeing evil in the world,
concerned with the amount and extent of evil that can be seen eg natural disasters, children suffering,
evidential is hard to remove from logical as it is blamed on God’s attributes
Logical problem of evil (removal)
The triad illustrates:
> God is wholly good but not powerful enough to stop evil,
> God is all powerful and could prevent evil but cannot wholly care about our suffering,
> God is all powerful and all good to want to remove suffering but evil is an illusion and doesn’t exist
Augustine’s theodicy
> everything created perfectly by God,
humans fall short due to fall of humans and angles,
loss of harmony in nature,
people fall short,
all deserve punishment - seminally present,
cannot stop it as we have free will,
sent Jesus so people can go to heaven
Responses to logical and evidential problems
> evil is part of a bigger plan,
some suffering is good and we learn from mistakes,
suffering and evil can bring about the best in people,
God needs to test humanity,
suffering could be a result of previous actions,
if we are genuinely free then suffering is something that we must accept
Augustine
> God could only make a prefect world,
evil is a privation of good (a lack of),
God cannot be blamed for evil because you cannot create a privation
Augustine - natural evil
the fall of the angles
> caused disharmony and imbalance,
> led to natural disasters,
> God allows this to act as a punishment for original sin
Augustine - moral evil
The fall of humans: > Adam and eve eating off the tree, > first sin corrupts human nature, > everyone inherits this as we were seminally present in Adam, > everyone deserves to be punished
Weaknesses - Augustine
> if God created a prefect world where did evil come from,
impossible to be seminally present in Adam,
reading genesis in a way that is not really accepted (we move away from perfection - opposite to evolution),
not fair to punish if not seminally present,
hard to put angelic disobedience to natural evil,
does not explain the amount of suffering,
Schleirmacker - why did God create hell
Strengths - Augustine
> God cannot create a privation,
genuine free will requires no interference with God,
free will seems to cause the most suffering,
natural evil - only evil from the way that we see the world,
MacCabe - something is ‘bad’ when it does not live up to its standards
Logical problem challenges beliefs
> evil and suffering continue so he cannot be all powerful,
Can’t be ominbenevolent - would love us too much,
inconsistency in God knowing of evil, wholly good and powerful could prevent it
Logical problem does NOT challenge beliefs
> Plantiga - God chose to limit himself,
we cannot understand God because human perspective is limited,
good reason for evil to continue,
good cannot exist without evil
Solutions to logical problem
Remove one of his attributes he is: not worthy of worship/ cannot exist/ our understanding of God needs to change,
Remove omnipotence then he is a sufferer
Evidential problem challenges beliefs
> Hume - observation of evil and suffering questions his benevolence and power,
God could have made humans to always chose good,
Dostoyevsky - a God who allows this amount and extent of suffering is not worth of worship
Evidential problem does NOT challenge belief
> logical problem is greater as it highlights inconstancies,
need evidential and logical to challenge belief,
Swinburne - evidential provides motivation to find cures for disease for example
Irenaean theodicies
> see it as an opportunity,
these are soul making,
idea that evil is in the world to help people develop their characters in some way,
evil and free will shape the world to perfection