Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

psychology > the learning approach > Flashcards

the learning approach Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
AP® Psychology flashcards Psychology 101 flashcards GRE® Psychology flashcards
1
Q

John Locke

A

(1632-1704) argued that the mind is a ‘blank slate at birth upon which learning and experience writes: the result of the environment’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

who argued that the mind begins as a blank slate?

A

John Locke (and the behaviourist approach later based on his ideas)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

the behaviourist approach

A
  • believe that we are born a blank slate, based on John Locke’s ideas
  • focus on nurture not nature
  • classical and operant conditioning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

key assumptions of the behaviourist approach

A
  • behaviour is the result of the environment and we learn through experiences (extreme ‘nurture’ end of nature-nurture debate)
  • only interested in observable and measurable behaviour
  • relies on lab experiments as its method of research as these are the most scientific, controlled, and objective
  • the basic processes that cause learning are the same in all species (so would test on animals, assuming it would be the same as in humans)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

two main forms of learning in behaviourism

A

classical and operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

classical conditioning

A

(dogs)
- learning through ASSociation (clASSical) discovered by Pavlov, a Russian physiologist
- he said we learn through associating two stimuli together
- classical conditioning takes place when two stimuli are repeatedly paired together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

overview process of classical conditioning

A
  1. unconditioned stimulus (food) > unconditioned response (salivation)
  2. neutral stimulus (bell) > no response
  3. neutral stimulus (bell) + unconditioned stimulus (food) > unconditioned response (salivation)
  4. (repeated)
  5. conditioned stimulus (bell) > conditioned response (salivation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

worded explanation of Pavlov’s classical conditioning

A

An unconditioned stimulus (US) such as food is presented to the dog triggering the unconditioned response (UR) of salivation. The bell begins as a neutral stimulus (NS) because it triggers no response from the dog. The bell (NS) is then rung at the same time as giving the dog food (US), producing an unconditioned response of salivation as the two stimuli are associated. After several pairings the conditioned stimulus (ringing of the bell) will produce a conditioned response (salivation) even without the presence of food (the US).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

neutral stimulus

A

something in the environment which does not initially cause a response eg. the bell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

unconditioned stimulus

A

anything that naturally has the power to produce a response in a human or animal eg. food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

unconditioned response

A

a natural reflex response to an unconditioned stimulus eg. salivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

conditioned stimulus

A

the neutral stimulus becomes the conditioned stimulus when it acquires the ability to produce a specific response in the human or animal eg. bell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

extinction (in terms of classical conditioning)

A

when a conditioned stimulus (eg. the bell) is experienced without the unconditioned stimulus (food) for some time the conditioned response (salivation) disappears - it is extinguished

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

spontaneous recovery

A

when, after extinction, a previously conditioned association (for example, salivating to the sound of a bell) reoccurs without more conditioning. The response to the stimulus reoccurs spontaneously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

stimulus generalisation

A

when stimuli similar to the CS produces the CR (eg. the dog will salivate to stimuli similar to bells such as the doorbell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the type of conditioning in which an individual learns through association?

A

clASSical conditioning (ASSociation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

operant conditioning

A

(rats)
- skinner (1953) suggested learning is an active process whereby humans and animals operate on their environment
- we learn through consequences
- we form a link between a behaviour and an event
- the idea is that when people behave in a particular way and are rewarded for that behaviour, they will repeat it (called reinforcement). If they are punished for that behaviour they will stop it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Skinner’s box

A

when placed in the Skinner box the animal has to press a lever in order to open a food lever and thus obtain reinforcement in the form of food. First, by accident, the lever is pressed and food was presented. This meant the rat got reinforced to repeat the behaviour as he got rewarded with food (positive reinforcement).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

possible consequences in operant conditioning

A

positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, positive punishment, or negative punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

positive reinforcement

A
  • receiving a reward when a certain behaviour is performed, this behaviour is reinforced, likely to do this behaviour again
  • eg. the rat receiving food for pressing the lever
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

negative reinforcement

A
  • something unpleasant is removed from the individual following a behaviour, the behaviour is reinforced and likely to be repeated
  • eg. stopping the electric shocks when a lever is pressed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

punishment

A
  • an unpleasant consequence for carrying out a behaviour, the behaviour is weakened, the probability of repeating the behaviour is decreased
  • eg. the rat presses a lever and receives an electric shock
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

positive punishment

A
  • something unpleasant is introduced (added) following a behaviour
24
Q

negative punishment

A
  • something is nice is removed (subtracted)
25
Q

difference between reinforcement and punishment

A

reinforcement - more likely to do it again
punishment - less likely to do it again

26
Q

what is the type of conditioning in which an individual learns through reinforcement?

A

operant conditioning (Skinner’s research)

27
Q

practical applications for operant conditioning

A
  • token economy in prisons (given tokens or coins when they carry out desirable behaviour)
  • form of positive reinforcement
  • helps to shape inmates behaviour
28
Q

practical applications for classical conditioning

A
  • use it to understand the development of phobias (we associate the fear with an otherwise neutral stimulus)
  • allows us to treat phobias by helping them to unlearn old associations and to form new ones
29
Q

nature vs nurture

A

nature - behaviour is based on genetic factors
nurture - behaviour is a product of experiences

30
Q

behaviourism on the nature vs nurture argument

A

behaviourism is nurture - believe in the blank slate theory/that we are products of our environment

31
Q

reductionism vs holism

A

reductionism - breaking behaviour down
holism - looking at behaviour as a whole

32
Q

behaviourism on the reductionism/holism argument

A

behaviourism is reductionist - not looking at internal mental processes

33
Q

determinism vs free will

A

determinism - behaviour is determined by preceding factors
free will - we can choose our behaviour

34
Q

behaviourism on the determinism/free will argument

A

behaviourism is determinist - we are a result of our previous learning experiences

35
Q

evaluation points for behaviourism (operant and classical)

A

EVALUATION POINTS
- reductionist (over-simplifying)
- practical applications
- scientific methods
- use of animals

36
Q

Little Albert experiment

A

(1920)
- Watson and Raynor presented Little Albert with a white rat and he showed no fear
- Watson then presented the rat with a loud bang that started Little Albert and made him cry
- After the continuous association of the white rat and loud noise, Little Albert was classically conditioned to experience fear at the sight of the rat
- Albert’s fear generalized to other stimuli that were similar to the rat, including a fur coat, some cotton wool, and a Father Christmas mask.

37
Q

questions answered by the Little Albert experiment

A
  1. Can an infant be conditioned to fear an animal that appears simultaneously with a loud, fear-arousing sound?
  2. Would such fear transfer to other animals or to inanimate objects?
  3. How long would such fears persist?
38
Q

what is the social learning theory?

A

Another ‘learning approach’ but SEPERATE to the behaviourist approach. Albert Bandura who proposed this approach, believed that classical and operant conditioning (behaviourism) couldn’t explain all human leaning. He therefore created a new theory which expanded on some behaviourist ideas and most importantly took into account the important mental processes in learning.

39
Q

key assumptions of the social learning theory

A
  • behaviour is learned from experience (nurture)
  • we learn through observation and imitation of others
  • agrees with behaviourism that learning can occur directly (conditioning) BUT also indirectly (through others
40
Q

role models and identification

A
  • in order to learn from a role model, it is important for us to identify with them
  • factors of identification may be personality, age, gender, upbringing, appearance
  • if an individual has these factors, they are more likely to influence us, whether they are physically present or not
41
Q

vicarious learning

A
  • a type of indirect learning that takes place when we observe someone else’s behaviour
  • we watch and learn about the likely consequences of an action and then decide whether we will copy that behaviour ourselves or not
  • Eg. if we see our older sister wash up and she gets a reward, we may decide to wash up in future.
42
Q

what are mediational processes? what 4 did Bandura identify?

A
  • SLT is described as the bridge between behaviourism and the cognitive approach. This is because it considers the cognitive elements involved in learning
  • these mental factors mediate (intervene) in the learning process to determine whether a new response is require. Albert Bandura identified 4 mediational processes:
    1. attention
    2. retention
    3. motor reproduction
    4. motivation
43
Q

attention

A
  • a mediational process identified by Albert Bandura
  • relates to the learning of a behaviour
  • the extent to which we pay ‘attention’ to / notice other people’s behaviour. We are more likely to pay attention if we identify with the model.
44
Q

retention

A
  • a mediational process identified by Albert Bandura
  • relates to the learning of a behaviour
  • How well we are able to remember (retain) the behaviour we have seen. We are more likely to remember it if we like what have seen.
45
Q

(motor) reproduction

A
  • a mediational process identified by Albert Bandura
  • relates to the performance of a behaviour
  • evaluate our own ability to copy the behaviour. If it is too easy or too hard we might not try, it has to be the right level of challenge.
46
Q

motivation

A
  • a mediational process identified by Albert Bandura
  • relates to the performance of a behaviour
  • wanting to reproduce the behaviour. This tends to come in the form of a valued reward. If the reward is not valued or the behaviour is punished, we are less motivated to imitate.
47
Q

the process of imitation

A

A child’s learning is acquired through imitation of attitudes and behaviour that is modelled by parents and other significant people. When a model is provided, behaviour can be very quickly acquired, eg. Bandura’s research.
- James Bulger case

48
Q

evaluation points for social learning theory

A

+ supporting research (scientific and falsifiable)
+ practical applications (impacted media and age ratings)
+ considered internal mental processes
+ explains cultural differences in behaviour

  • over-reliance on lab study evidence (low external validity, low mundane realism, demand characteristics, ethics)
  • underestimates biological factors
49
Q

the bobo doll experiment (A)

A
  • Bandura et al. (1961)
  • recorded the behaviour of young children who watched an adult behave in an aggressive way towards a Bobo doll
  • the adult hit the doll with a hammer and then shouted abuse at it
  • when these children then behaved much more aggressively towards the doll and the other toys than those who had observed a non-aggressive adult
  • this shows imitation and social learning
50
Q

the bobo doll experiment (B)

A
  • Bandura and Richard Walters, in 1963
  • showed videos to children where an adult behaved aggressively towards the Bobo doll
  • one group of children saw the adult praised for their behaviour (being told “well done”)
  • a second group saw the adult punished for their aggression towards the doll by being told off
  • the third group (control) saw the aggression without any consequence.
  • when given their own Bobo doll to play with, the first group showed much more aggression, followed by the third group, and then the second.
  • shows operant conditioning and social learning
51
Q

James Bulger case

A
  • the debate as to whether Bandura’s Bobo doll experiments had implications for the media was brought into focus in 1990 following the death of James Bulger
  • he was a toddler from Liverpool murdered by two ten-year-old boys
  • at the time it was argued by many newspapers that the killers were inspired by the horror film Child’s Play 3
  • as a result there were calls for rules and censorship in media
  • many researchers do dispute the link between media and real-world violence, eg. Guy Cumberbatch et al. (2001)
52
Q

Guy Cumberbatch et al. (2001)

A
  • disputed the link between media and real-world violence
  • argues that supposed ‘video nasties’ of the type cited in the Bulger case are more likely to frighten children than make them aggressive
  • he argues that isolated incidents such as these are better explained by other factors such as social deprivation, child abuse and early exposure to violence in the home
53
Q

explanation of abnormal behaviour in the behaviourist approach

A
  • faulty learning
  • negative associations leading to a fear response
54
Q

treatment of abnormal behaviour in the behaviourist approach

A
  • flooding (immediate exposure)
  • systematic desensitisation (gradual exposure)
55
Q

explanation of abnormal behaviour in social learning theory

A

negative role models

56
Q

treatment of abnormal behaviour in social learning theory

A

CBT

psychology (15 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions