The Challenges Flashcards
The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment- one of the most important documents so far this century.
Protect soil. Increase rates of soil formation by adding Ca- silicate rock dust and maintaining vegetation cover.
The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment- evaluating the human impacts on the ecosystem services that sustain us
social gain at environmental cost
many options exist to conserve of enhance ecosystem services that reduce negative trade-offs or that provide positive synergies with other ecosystem services
Need to provide financial rewards to farmers for ecosystem service benefits- subsidies linked to effective agri-environment schemes improved on the previous implementation of EU farm payments.
Parallels to agroecology and permaculture
Relationships under strain- are we approaching the ‘great divorce?’
Soil-Plant-Human Relationships
- human action ratcheted up rates of soil erosion
Soil: ‘Mother Earth’
Our most important natural resource
- but we treat it as dirt
How can we have lost 33% of the world’s productive topsoils in the past 40 years?
Why do most people not know about this?
Like the rest of the terrestrial biosphere, we are intimately connected to and wholly dependent upon soil.
“The soil is the great connector of our lives, the source and destination of all,” Wendell Berry (1977) The Unsettling of America.
‘Civilised man has marched across the face of the earth and left a desert in his footprints.’
‘Civilised man was nearly always able to become master of his environment temporarily. His chief troubles came from his delusions that his temporary mastership was permanent. He thought of himself as “master of the world”, while failing to understand fully the laws of nature.’
(Carter and Dale 1974)
‘A century of intensive farming in the Great Plains of America has reduced top soil depth by up to 90%.
We are not farming the soil, we are mining it.“
(Albert Bates, The Farm community, Tennessee)
The tragedy of the commons develops in this way.
Picture a pasture open to all. As a rational being, each herdsman seeks to maximize his gain. And asks, “What is the value to me of adding one more animal to my herd?”
This value has one negative and one positive component. Since the herdsman receives all the proceeds from the sale of an additional animal, the positive value is nearly +1. The negative component is a function of the additional overgrazing created by one more animal. Since, however, the effects of overgrazing are shared by all the herdsmen, the negative value is only a fraction of –1.
The lesson of the “tragedy of the commons”
Short-term financial goals can erode the sustainability of production.
The problem is persuading everyone to change their behaviour to sustainability.
Without incentivising the common good we risk bringing ruin to all.
If our economic system does not value sustainability over short-term profit It will destroy itself.
Some problems need behaviour-change including changing human values and ideas of morality (as well as technical solutions).
.
Hardin (1968) argued that human population growth has no technical solution. His views are debatable.
Empirical evidence suggests that people provided with access to contraception and having good education and a reasonable quality of life tend to choose to have fewer children.
The technical solution may be greater equality of wealth and access to healthcare and education if global population growth is to stabilize.
The fact that the latest projections for world population growth indicate that Africa will contribute most to the global rise in population to 2100 is consistent with this.
The tragedy of the commons requires both technical and behavioural changes to achieve optimum solutions.
Agricultural economics based on profit without consideration of environmental or human costs or benefits
‘The farmer is considered simply as a producer who must cut his costs and raise his efficiency by every possible device, even if he thereby destroys the health of the soil and beauty of the landscape’. (Schumacher 1973)
Direct consequences : Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE – “mad cow disease” and human Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease- has killed 177 people in the UK and cost the farming industry up to £980,000,000. The most recent case was in a cow in Scotland in October 2018 - the first reported case in Scotland for 10 years.
Similarly soil degradation leading to flooding and biodiversity loss have had serious environmental and economic consequences.
‘An irreligious age looks with amused contempt upon the hallowed statements by which religion helped our forebears to appreciate
metaphysical truths’. (Schumacher 1973) ‘Small is Beautiful’.
‘And the Lord God took man and put him in the Garden of Eden’ – not to be idle, but to ‘to do work in it and take care of it.’ Genesis 2:15
The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals agreed by 193 countries in 2015- seeking to achieve the majority of these goals by 2030. Achieving sustainability of agro-ecosystems lies at the heart of sustainable development.
There is increasing evidence that we have the technical means to care for the soil, produce food sustainably and look after the rest of the living world. People increasingly understand the problems and want to change the system that has treated people and the planet unfairly and irresponsibly.
“The problems are solvable. What is stopping us is ourselves- our economics and values. It is a values debate”.
“We need to grow empathy not GDP”
Mike-Berners Lee (2019) speaking at Greenbelt Festival
“For over 70 years economics has been fixated on GDP, or national output, as its primary measure of progress. That fixation has been used to justify extreme inequalities of income and wealth coupled with unprecedented destruction of the living world. A far bigger goal is needed: meeting the human rights of every person within the means of our life-giving planet.”
Kate Raworth (2017) Doughnut economics
If the world is to move towards an environmentally sustainable way of life, it means acting on the basis of the common good as never before, indeed acting for the good of humanity as a whole.
Greater equality is not only consistent with moving towards sustainability, but a precondition for doing so. It is the key to moving society from the pursuit of false, and environmentally damaging sources of well-being based in selfish consumerism, to genuine social ones.
Moving towards sustainability requires that we improve the real quality of modern life in ways that higher incomes and consumerism cannot.
The UK per household carbon dioxide footprint
tonnes per year
Food, clothes, house, personal goods, travel, power, heat
Knowledge and Responsibility
We are the first generation to grow up in a world in which we recognize that our actions, choices, consumption and waste have global and persistent effects that impact on our neighbours, other countries, and will affect future generations.
We are the first generation to be able to quantify our ‘ecological footprint’ and to realise that our use of natural resources is unsustainable.
How should we respond to this- personally and how do we communicate to others the need for change to deliver sustainability-to the benefit of all?
The moral, ethical, theological, political and economic dimensions
Margaret Thatcher:
“No generation has a freehold on this Earth. All we have is a life tenancy- with full repairing lease….we are its guardians and trustees for generations to come”.