Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Bar > The Bar-Torts > Flashcards

The Bar-Torts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards
1
Q

Res Ipsa Loquitor

A

P must show that accident causing injury is type that would not ordinarily occur unless someone was negligent, and that negligence occurs bc of someone in D’s position.

  • Does not shift burden
  • Does not allow presumption of negligence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dependent v. Independent Intervening Forces

A

Dependent intervening forces are normal responses or reactions to situations created by D’s negligence, which are usually foreseeable and therefore the D is usually liable. These include (1) subsequent medical malpractice (2) negligence of rescuers (3) efforts to protect person or property and (4) reaction forces –other swarm or retreat and stampede etc. (5) subsequent disease (6) subsequent accident

Independent intervening forces are independent actions other than natural responses to the situation like (1) negligent acts of 3rd party, (2) criminal act of 3rd party or (3) acts of God. D is is liable for results of IIFs where foreseeable or where his negligence increased risk .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Foreseeable Results Caused by Unforeseeable Intervening Forces

A

D usually liable

e.g. D leaves barrel of oil out. Risk of foreseeable harm means D is liable even for unforeseeable acts (lightning) unless that act is an intervening criminal or tortious act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Unforeseeable Result cased by Foreseeable Intervening Force

A

D not liable

e.g negligent driving but harm to P is branch falling on roof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Unforeseeable Result, Unforeseeable Intervening Force

A

No liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Duty–What and to Whom

A

Everyone has a ordinary prudent reasonable person duty to all forceable victims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

To Whom is a Duty Owed/Who are foreseeable victims?

A

Rescuers (unless the rescue is wonton) , viable fetuses, intended beneficiaries of economic transactions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Duty–Standards of Care

1-Ordinary

A

Ordinary: Objective–takes into account physical but not mental disability–with average knowledge of avg member of community

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Duty of Care–Professionals

A

Professionals–Person with special skills or knowledge is held to standard of member of that profession in good standing under similar circumstance (in same community, except in medical where national std applies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Duty of Care–Common Carriers and Innkeepers

A

High Duty of Care-liable for even slight negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Duty of Care–Landowners

A

trespassers–duty to only discovered or anticipated trespassers–known extremely dangerous artificial conditions.

attractive nuisance doctrine–landowner owes duty of ordinary care to children, where your property is likely to attract children, where cost is slight compared to risk.

licensees–(social guests/not business guests) duty to warn or make safe dangerous conditions known to owner that licensees is unlikely to discovery (not duty to conduct inspections) (“all known traps”)

invitees–(land held open to public/businesses) same as above plus duty to make inspections (‘all reasonably knowable traps”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Affirmative Duty to Act

A

Where D creates peril, special relationships (common carriers, parents, public accommodation, by contract, you already started helping .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Self Defence

A
  • may be of self, others, or property
  • threat must be in progress or imminent
  • must have reasonable belief that threat is genuine (a reasonable mistake will not destroy the privilege)
  • force used must be proportional
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Proportional Self Defence

A
  • You can only use proportional force
  • in life threatening situation, you may use deadly force
  • you cannot do by machine what you cannot do in person (cant use mechanical gun to protect land)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Necessity–when is it available as a privilege?

A

Only available for
1. Trespass to Land.
2, Trespass to Chattels
3, Conversion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Public Necessity

A

Available as a defence where an individual acts in an emergency to protect the community as a whole:

  1. emergency must be natural–not coming from plaintiff (or like a sniper shooting people)
  2. D uses someone else (like steals a fire extinguisher)

(policy–dont want actor to hesitate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Private Necessity

A

where D commits property tort in emergency to protect his own interest or a interest of his own

consequence:
1 . D remains liable for compensatory damage/actual damage
2. D not liable for nominal or punitive damages
3. P cannot throw D off land as necessity continues (must tolerate his presence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Elements of Defamation

A
  1. D makes a defamatory (tending to adversely effect reputation/bring you down in esteem of other people) statement about the plaintiff.
  2. Publication of the statement (D must reveal it to at least one person other than plaintiff) (more sharing = more damages). Publication need not be intentional.
  3. Damages (can be presumed in certain cases, slander per se, libel) (economic loss-job loss, contract loss, cannot be just social damages)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Limitations on Defamation

A

You can only defame a living person

name calling is not defamatory

a non-factual opinion is not defamation (but if you have factual support, it is)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Publication (as an element of Defamation)

A

need not be intentional

reveal to at least one other person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Libel

A

defamatory statement permanently embodied in medium of expressions

presumed damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Damages in Libel case

A

Presumed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Slander per se

A

Damages are presumed:

  1. where statement about P’s business or profession
  2. you say that P has committed a serious crime of moral turpitude (has to do with violence or honesty)
  3. imputing unchastity of a woman (sex outside of marriage)
  4. , you say that P suffers from a loathsome disease–VD or leprosy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Affirmative Defences to Defamation

A
  1. Consent
  2. Truth (burden on Defendant)
  3. Privilege (absolute or qualified)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Absolute privilege as an affirmative defense to defamation

A
  • *depends on the status of the defendant
  • -i.e. you can tell your spouse anything you want.
  • -remarks made by federal or state legislators in their official capacity during legislative proceeedings, and fnuofficers of government (judge, witness, lawyer)-you can put things in briefs, quote, and this can never be basis of a defamation suit–includes legislative record
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Qualified privilege as an affirmative defense to defamation

A
  • *based on the circumstances of the speech
    1. public interest in encouraging candor
  • -e.g. a LL can tell other LL stuff about their tenants, professors can say things about their students (even if they dont turn out to be true)

Requirements:
1. Good faith, confined to matters relevant to topic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

First Amendment limitations on defamation–matters of public concern

A

Where statement is a matter of public concern, you must prove two additional elements
1. Fault–statements not made in good faith
(where public figure–P shows knowledge or recklessness w/r/t truth. where private figure–P shows it was made with negligence)
2. Plaintiff has burden of proving falsity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What are the 4 privacy torts?

A

Appropriation
Intrusion into P’s seclusion
False Light
Disclosure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What type of fault must P show where pubic figure, matter of public concern?

A

P must show actual malice: D acted with knowledge or recklessly with respect to truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What type of fault must P show where private figure, matter of public concern?

A

P shows that D acted negligently w/r/t truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Approprioation

A

D uses P’s name or picture for commercial purposes.

**doenst matter that picture is of someone unimportant

**newsworthiness exception–no tort if newspaper puts pic of athlete

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

newsworthiness exception

A

applies to appropriation and disclosure, no tort if newspaper puts pic of athlete, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Intrusion into Seclusion

A

Invasion of P’s seclusion in a way that would be highly offensive to the average person, in place where P has a reasonable expectation of privacy

  • think wiretapping/covert video surveillance/peeping tom
  • not where someone takes your photo while you are on the street
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

False Light

A

Widespread dissemination of material falsehood about the Plaintiff that would be highly offensive to the average person.

Difference= you can have EMOTIONAL damages!

i.e. telling everyone a big lie–mischaracterizing someone’s religious belief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What’s the biggest difference between Slander and False Light?

A

In slander you can only recover economic damages, in false light you may recover for emotional damages.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Disclosure

A

Widespread dissemination of confidential info about P that would be highly offensive to average persons (true!)

Must have been truly private–its not private if your close friends know–must be something people really don’t know.

e.g. publishing someone’s medical records

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Biggest Dif between Disclosure and False Light?

A

Disclosure is of true gossip, false light is false gossip

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Defenses to Torts of Privacy

A
  1. Consent

2. For False Light and Disclosure: Privilege.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Negligence

A

Elements:

Duty Breach Causation (factual and legal) Damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

To whom do you owe a duty?

A

Foreseeeable victims of your carelessness only!

(rescuers are forseeeable victims!)

Unforeseeable victims are far away–think firework train cae

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What duty is owed (generally)

A

Owe duty of ordinary care: Must take as much care as a reasonable prudent person would take under similar circumstance.

What doesn’t matter: person’s mental capacity

What does matter: physical attributes of the D–blindness, wheel chair, height if relevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

Duty of Care for People of Superior Skill or Knowledge

A

compare D to a reasonable person with such superior skill or knowledge

43
Q

Duty of Care for People of Different physical ability

A

reasonable person with that attribute–blind person, etc

44
Q

Special Duties (6)

A
  1. Claims against children, professionals, premises liability, statutory, act affirmatively, negligent infliction of emotional direstress
45
Q

Duty owed by children

A
  1. Kids 4m children must behave as hypothetical child of similar age, experience, and intelligence, acting under similar circumstances–a flexible and subjective standard.

**Child engaged in adult activity is held to adult standard of care (operating a motor vehicle) (split on hunting)

46
Q

Duty of Care owed by Children Engaging in Adult Activity

A

Ordinary standard of care

47
Q

Duty of Care for Professionals

A

(health care, accountants, lawyers, any job requiring special skills)

Restatement: A professional is obligated to exercise the skill and knowledge normally possessed by members of the same profession in good standing. (behave with same care as avg. member of of same professional)

**look at national standard of care

**P needs an expert witness to establish the standard of care

–this means you can conform to practice, and custom IS dispositive. CUSTOM OF PROFESSION IS STANDARD OF CARE

48
Q

How does Custom factor in to assessing standard of care:

A

Evidence but not dispositive for ordinary duty.

DISPOSTIVE in Professional duty case

49
Q

Duty owed to Unknown Trespassers

A

Unknown means unknown or undiscovered trespassers (and no reason to know)

NO DUTY OF CARE bc unforeseeable

50
Q

Duty owed to Known trepassers

A

This includes anticipated trespassers, where there is a pattern of trespassing you know.

Standard: possessor must protect anticipated trespasser from highly dangerous, artificial, concealed hazards about which the landowner had prior knowledge (known, made made death traps)

51
Q

Duty owed to Licensee

A

Landowner owes licensees duty to protect from concealed conditions about which the possessor had prior knowledege

52
Q

Duty owed to invitees

A

Landowner owes invitees a duty to protect from all concealed conditions that the possessor knew or could have discovered through reasonable inspection.

53
Q

3 exceptions for premises liability

A

Police officers/fire fighters–never recover for injury inherent risk of job.

Child trespasser: Property owner owes reasonable care to children under attractive nuisance doctrine. need not be attracted to the thing that injures them. Consider age of children.

54
Q

How can you satisfy your duty for premises liability cases

A

Eliminate hazard, or warn–

55
Q

Statutory Standard of Care

A

Where you borrow the terms of a statute instead of reasonable standard of care–where you find someone broke the statute, they are negligent per se.

P must show (1) he is member of class of persons statute is trying to protect and (2) accident occurred is within the class of risks that statute was trying to prevent

56
Q

Negligence per se

A

duty and breach established where someone broke statute that satisfies class of risk test.

57
Q

Exceptions to Statutory Standard of Care

A
  • -no liability even where conditions are met where:
    1. compliance is more dangerous than violation
    2. compliance was impossible under circumstances (medical emergency)
58
Q

Duties to Act affirmatively

A

(1) pre existing relationship (employer/employee, innkeeper/guest.
(2) D caused the peril–
(3) if you start to rescue, you are obligated to help reasonably (unless changed by a good Samaritan Law)

59
Q

Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress

A
  • for when P did not suffer physical harm
    1. near miss: D’s negligence put P in zone of physical danger, and show subsequent manifestations of distress
  1. Bystander: 3rd party who is a close family member of victim witnesses (hears, sees, perceives) injury and suffers emotional distress
    - -must be contemporanous (see it happen)
  2. Where P and D are in a pre-existing business relationship and it is highly foreseeable that careless performance by D will cause significant distress
    e. g. false positive diagnosis, funeral parlor,
60
Q

Nuissance

A

A private nuisance is a substantial, unreasonable interference with another person’s use or quiet enjoyment of her property. Must be offensive, inconvenient, or annoying to the average person in the community, not a specialized use.

61
Q

Partial Comparitive Negligence

A

P can ecover damages as long as her negligence was less serious than, or no more serious than D,

When there are multiple D, most use Combined Comparison which compares every P to the combined negligence of the other parties, allows recover as long as no more than combined other.

3 parties P1=51%, P2= 10% P3=39%

1 v. 2 +3 51 v 49? NO
2 v 1+3 10 v 90 OK
3 v. 1 and 2 : 39 v. 61 OK

62
Q

Right to use Force to Recover Chattle

A

ONLY in hot persuit to stop theft,

No force allowed where other person lawfully possessed the chattel (bc you gave him limited permission, etc)

63
Q

Breach

A

Did D’s conduct fall short of the standard of care (by act or commission)

2 things:
“P will allege that the unreasonable conduct here was the the D_____” P will argue that this was unreasonable because ________”

64
Q

Factual Causation

A

Linkage between breach and injury

but for Causation–

a question for the jury to decide

65
Q

Factual Causation-merged caused

A

Where each negligent defendant did something bad and together they hurt the plaintiff. But for test wont work because both might fail. (2 separate fires burn a building)

Standard: substantial factor test: was each breach capable of causing harm all by itself

66
Q

Factual Causation-Unascertainable claims

A

Where only 1 D caused the injury but its impossible to know whom (quail shooting).

Standard: shift burden of proof to defense to show lack of negligence.

67
Q

Legal Cause

A

Whether liability is fair–and it is fair where foreseeable–factors = time, distance, weirdness.

68
Q

When is foreseeability a matter of law?

A
  1. intervening negligent medical treatment
  2. intervening negligent rescue
  3. intervening reaction of protective forces (car accident causes stampede)
  4. subsequent disease or accident.
69
Q

Egg shell plaintiff rule

A

Once D has committed elements of negligence, D is liable for all harm caused even if P is unusually sensitive. (take P as you find him)

70
Q

Comparative Negligence

A

A defense.

Must prove that P failed to exercise proper care.

Then jury weights and assigns each party a % based on degree of fault. You reduce the P’s award by that amount.

71
Q

Partial/Modified Comparative Neglience

A

Where P’s fault is under 50% you reduce recovery by that amount

BUT where P’s fault is >50% its a total bar to recovery.

72
Q

Strict Liability–When

A

Wild Animals, Abnormally Dangerous Activities, Defective Products

73
Q

Liability for Wild Animals

A

Strict! doesn’t matter how many safety precautions you take

not SL for domestic unless you have knowledge of its danger (this specific dog, etc)

No liability for trespassers.

74
Q

Abnormally Dangerous Activities

A

SL where:

a. activity is one that creates foreseeable risk of serious harm even when reasonable care is exercised.
b. we lack technology to make it safe.

in general, activity cannot e common where conducted (crop dusting)

75
Q

What activities are ALWAYS considered abnormally dangerous?

A

Blasting Explosives

Transporting Chemical Material

High Dose Radiation/Nuclear Energy

76
Q

Defective Products–Elements

A

a Strict Liability offense

  1. D is a merchant, including parties up the distribution claim and lessors (not a casual seller, or service provider)
  2. Product is Defective (manufacturing defect, design defect, information defect)
  3. Defect existed when product left D’s hand (i.e. has not been altered)
  4. P must be making foreseeable use of product at time of injury (»intended use)
77
Q

Manufacturing Defect?

A

Product differs from other products from the same factory in a way that makes it more dangerous than consumers would expect.

78
Q

Design Defect

A

Fails risk utility test–>the danger of the product outweighs its value and a reasonable person would not have put it on the market.

**P must show viable alternative design–would have been safer than version sold but no more expensive and not impractical

**Failure to conform to relevant regulation is conclusive that it is defective.

79
Q

Information Defect

A

If product cant be redesigned physically in cost effective way but has residual risk unknown to consumers and is known to maker but lacks warning.

Warning must be adequate–needs to be visible, correct, easy to find.

80
Q

Affirmative Defense for Strict Liability Crimes

A

Comparative responsibility (just like comparative negligence)

81
Q

Nuisance

A

Interference with one’s ability to use and enjoy one’s real estate to an unreasonable degree.

Question is whether degree of interference is too much–must be seriously annoying–to ordinary person

i.e. inconsistent land use–putting a smoke factory next to an asthma hospital

82
Q

Respondeat Superior

A

Employer is vicariously liable for torts of employees committed within the scope of their employment (not for outside scope or intentional torts unless.)

May be liable for intentional torts where: force is within the job title, job generates animosity (debt collector), or employee engages in intentional tort out of motive of serving bosses purpose

(think bouncer/security guards)

83
Q

When is an employer liable for intentional torts of employees?

A

May be liable for intentional torts where: force is within the job title, job generates animosity (debt collector), or employee engages in intentional tort out of motive of serving bosses purpose

(think bouncer/security guards)

84
Q

Is a parent responsible for torts of kids?

A

no! but may be liable for negligent supervision.

85
Q

Hirer/Independent contractor?

A

no vicarious liability unless independent contractor hurts a customer on premises.

86
Q

automobile owner/driver

A

no vicarious liability unless someone hires driver to do errand–then there is a principle agent relationship and VL

87
Q

Negligent Hiring, Supervision, Entrusment

A

not examples of vicarious liability

88
Q

Comparative Contribution

A

Jury will assign damage amount to multiple D, if one is insolvent others must pay—run the risk of poorness

except: indeminifcation

89
Q

indemnification

A

if you have been held vicariously liable and the other tort committer is in the case you can make him (employee) pay for it all

Product liability–retailer can get indemnity from manufacturer

90
Q

Loss of Consortium

A

Where victim was married, uninjured spouse has a separate cause of action and same defenses apply

damages include loss of services, loss of society, loss of sex–need to be proved

91
Q

Intentional Torts–general

A

Extreme sensitivity of the P ignored when deciding if P has a claim!–always assume you are dealing with someone of ordinary sensibility

No incapacity defenses–D cant lack capacity to commit intentional tort–even children held liable

92
Q

Intent–defined

A

A D acts intentionally (with purpose or knowledge) if he desires to bring about forbidden result or knows result is certain to occur.

93
Q

Battery

A
  1. intent
  2. to commit a harmful of offensive contact (un-permitted) (ordinary sensitive)
  3. with the plaintiff’s person (includes anything P holds, touches, or carries–grabbing your purse, jumping on car while you’re in it.
  4. harmful or offensive touching happens

(need not produce instantaneous harm)

94
Q

Assault

A

1 intent

  1. D must place P in reasonable apprehension of an immediate battery (apprehension means awareness, knowledge, not fear)

(LOOK UP: assault is also a botched battery bc of transferred intent?)

words alone lack immediacy, requires some kind of menacing gesture

words can negate immediacy

95
Q

False Imprisonment

A
  1. intent
  2. D must commit an act of restraint
  3. P must be confined in a bounded area

**threats are sufficient–ill shoot you if you leave/ill call the cops etc

**omissions can be acts of restraint if you have pre-existing duty to act

**act does not count unless P is aware or harmed by conduct.

96
Q

False Imprisonment–Act of Restraint

A

**threats are sufficient–ill shoot you if you leave/ill call the cops etc

**omissions can be acts of restraint if you have pre-existing duty to act

**act does not count unless P is aware or harmed by conduct.

97
Q

False Imprisonment–Bounded Areas

A

Need not be marked by physical boundaries, can be approximate like don’t leave the park

Area is NOT bounded if there is a reasonable means of escape that P can reasonable discovery without danger, disgust, or humiliation. Not reasonable if P does not know about it.

98
Q

Intentional Infliction of Mental Distress (IIED)

A
  1. relaxed intent–desire, knowledge, recklessness
  2. D must engage in outrageous conduct–exceeds all bounds of decency tolerated in civilized society. (not mere insults)
  3. P must suffer severe distress–P can prove this thru any evidence–shrink, missing work, don’t need physical symptoms

(watch out for P feeling mildly annoyed–never good enough)

99
Q

Hallmarks of IIED

A

–continuous or repetitive conduct can turn words into IIED.

–D is common carrier or innkeeper–owe duty of courtesy–more likely to be held liable

–where P is member of a fragile class of people (kids, elderly, pregnant women when D knowns, or if D has knowledge of P’s peculiar emotional sensitivity

100
Q

Elements of Misrepresentation

A

Misrep of material fact,
that you you knew or believed was false/w/o basis
intent to produce act of refrain from acting in reliance
causation
justifiable reliance
damages

101
Q

negligent misrepresentation

A 
misrep by D in business/professional capacity
breach of duty
causation
justifiable reliance
damages
102
Q

interference with business relations

A

valid contract exists, D knows of it, itnentionally inteferes by inducing breach or termination, damages

103
Q

Attractive Nuissance Doctrine

A

1 dangerous condition on land that owner knew or should have known about

  1. owner knows/should know kids go to land
  2. very dangerous (bc of kids age maybe)
  3. cost of fixing

Bar (14 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions