Federal Civil Procedure Flashcards
Standard for Motion for Summary J
A MSJ should be granted if based on the pleadings, affidavits, and discovery materials, viewed in the light most favorable to the non moving party, it appears that there is genuine dispute of material fact.
Once a moving party submits affidavits or evidence in support the non moving party must counter with its own evidence on the matter
How will a court treat a settlement for the purpose of assessing issue or claim preclusion
Is not an ACTUAL judgement so it cannot be used
Elements of Claim Preclusion/Res Judicata
- Cases were brought by same claimant against the same defendant/
- Case 1 ended with a valid final judgement on the merits. (not a settlement, not jurisdiction, venue, or indispensable parties, everything else is a yes).
- Cases assert same claim.
a. Majority–any right to relieve arising from same T/o
b. minorites views personal injuries as distinct from property injuries.
Issue Preclusion (Collateral Estoppel)
- Case ended in valid final J on mertis
- same issue was actually litigated and determined in case 1.
- that issue was essential for judgement in case 1.
Against whom can issue preclusion be asserted?
Someone who was a party in case 1, or in privity with a party
Who can assert an issue preclusion claim?
- Someone who was a party in Case 1 can use it/
2. issue non mutual issue preclusion (see other cards)
Non mutual defensive issue preclsuion
IP asserted by someone not a party to claim 1 against a new P
allowed where P had full chance to litigate in the first case, and where fair
Non mutual offensive issue preclusion
IP asserted by someone not a party to claim 1 and is now the P in claim 2.
Most states today say NO, with a clear trend allowing it so long as it is not unfair–citing these factors:
- full and fail opp to litigate in case 1
- incentive to litigate strongly
- could not have joined party in first case
- no inconsistent findings on issue (this isnt the 5th time case has been heard with 2-2-.
What service is required by DP
DP requires that the method of giving notice must have a reasonable prospect of giving actual notice==posting is not suffcient if names and addresses are known
Rule for disclosure of existence of insurance
Must==pursuant to Fed R Civ P 26(b)2.–must disclose in initial disclosure
Removal to Federal Court–Timing
If a diversity action is not initially removable but later becomes removable, it may not be removed more than one year after it was commenced in state court.
D has 30 days after case becomes removable to remove.
Interpleader
used where P is in possession of property claimed by 2 or more other parties. Requires that the claimants litigate among themselves as to who is entitled to the property.
Who can remove a case?
Only a D. No a P. Even if the D counterclaims, no P. Even if the P joins in removal, no P.
Removal Rule
An action filed in a state court may be removed to federal court if 1) case could have been originally filed in federal court, ii) cases removed on the basis of diversity, no defendant is a citizen of the state where the action was filed
What happens if case is removed, but state court did not have jurisdiction?
May do it. Federal court may hear a removed case even though the state court from which the case ws removed did not have jurisdiction.
Aggregation of Claims
A plaintiff may aggregate even unrelated claims to get to the 75001 minimum.
Can there be diversity jurisdiction over an american living abroad?
NO. A US citizen domiciled abroad is not a citizen of ay state and is not an alien and cannot be sued under diversity jurisdiction.
What must non-moving party do to overcome MSJ?
Where P supports MSJ with substantial evidence, defendant must come forth with admissible evidence in rebuttal. Party cannot rely on pleadings allegation unless VERIFIED pleadings
What is discoverable?
Discovery may be had of any non privileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case, including the identity of any individuals with knowledge of any discoverable matter.
Erie Doctrine
Federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction should apply the substantive law of the state, and federal procedural law. –Federal law on point will govern if it is arguably procedural.
Procedure for getting a Default Judgement after a clerk has entered entry of default?
- If the D never responded at all: file a motion to have the clerk of court enter the default J, and the clerk may do so w/o the D receiving any further notice of the motion
if you file a motion to dismiss for lack of SMJ can you assert lack of PJ in answer?
NO–waived.
Personal Jurisdiction
Does D have such minimum contacts with the forum so jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?
Ask–Contact, Relatedness, Fairness
Contact: did D purposefully avail himself to forum, such that it was foreseeable that he could get sued in this forum.
Relatedness: Does P’s claim arise out of D’s contacts with forum.–>if yes there is P (specific PJ), if not you need general –D must be at home in forum. (where domiciled, or corp where incorporated and ppb)
Fairness–only relevant for specific PJ Cases.
a. burden on D and witnesses (wealth not dispositive) states interest, plaintiff’s interest in being at home.
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Federal Q;
Diversity (between 2 citizens of different states, or between a citz of a state and one of a foreign country.) + >75,000.
Diversity and Alieange
Diversity SMJ includes one citz of a state and an alien–but some exceptions:
an alien admitted to the US for permanent residence, who is domociled in a US state is an alien—so she can invoke diversity J through alienage, but not through diversity.
BUT–a green card alien domociled in same US state as a litigatnt cant sue in federal court, by statute
alien (NY) v. NY–>no SMJ
AND–a US citizen domiciled abroad can never get into fed court by diversity OR alienage
Citz of a corporation
Every state or country where it is incorporated, the one state or country where it has its PPB
PPB is where managers: direct, coordinate, control corporate activities, typically headquarters
Citizenship of a Partnership
Citzen of domicile of all its members!