Test 3 Pt. 1 (Ch. 6) Flashcards
equality of income
same opportunity to achieve material-well being
equality of outcome
achieve material-well being in situations among different groups in society
advantages of the affluent
live longer and better effort best medical care in the world, finest education, and elegant possessions
-discreetly influence politicians, police officer, and other public officials to promote or defend interests
-obtain social preference and shape government policies
formal definition of poverty
based on calculation of family food budget
informal definition of poverty
not having enough to meet basic needs considered necessary and desirable
how gov’t defines poverty line
-U.S. Dptmt. of Agriculture prepares estimates of cost of achieving a minimum lvl. of nutrition based on average food prices
-average low-income family must spend 1/3 on total income on food
-by multiplying family food budget by 3, gov’t arrives at poverty income that can be adjusted for the number of people and family and rising costs of food
-corrected annually for changes in cost of living as measured by consumer price index (CPI)
-made in 1965 by Mollie Orshansky who reasoned the primary measure of the adequacy of a person’s lvl. of living is food consumption
inequality of income distribution in U.S.
1% of all households hold over one-third of all personal wealth
-wealthiest 20% of households receive roughly 52% of all income (average $214,941)
-poorest 20% receive less than 4%
3 reasons for institution of policies of redistributing wealth
1) the wealthy get more out of the economic system and can afford to pay more taxes
2) wealthy have a greater investment in economic system and should pay more to maintain it
3) redistributing income from rich to poor is fair in a democratic socity
resource competition
factors those who’re rich
-wealthfare -> subsidies for the rich
Marx’s view of poverty
classification of poverty and class status determined by income
Weber’s view of poverty
classification of poverty and class status involves not only income, but attributes of status and power, also unequally distributed
impact of poverty on children
1/5 of children live in poverty in the U.S.
inadequate healthcare and nutrition
–undernutrition in pregnancy -> low birth weight
–lower academic performance
–iron deficiency -> weak problem solving abilities, attention deficits, lower long-term IQ
–lack of health insurance
low quality home enviro.
–less nurturing parenting, harsh discipline, less secure attachments
–less stimulation, greater family responsibility for girls
low quality neighborhood
–crime and violence, inferior schools, pollution
–toxic chemicals, drug use, idle adults as role models
parental stress and mental health issues
–adult depression, parental conflict, less social support
–child abuse/neglect, child depression, behavioral problems
few learning resources
–inferior child care, few books, toys, few stimulating activities after school
–high high-school dropout rate, less money for college, lower attendance
housing issues
—-homelessness, frequent moves, utility shutoff, crowding
–rodents and pests, lead paint and other enviro. issues
individualistic explanation of poverty
everyone has equal opportunity, people who are poor, particularly welfare recipients, are blatant examples or those who have failed to work hard
-poverty is primarily the result of laziness or lack of motivation, and those who are poor generally have only themselves to blame
-asserts that U.S. is a land of meritocracy, and hard work will reap social and financial rewards
structural explanations of poverty
attribute poverty to functioning of dominant institutions of society, like markets and corporations
-assumes poverty is a result of economic or social imbalances within social structure that restrict opportunities for some individuals
-emphasize dual market for labor
–favored groups are given access to better jobs that offer secure employment and good benefits
–minorities and migrants are shunted into another segment of labor market in which jobs pay poorly and offer no security or benefits
cultural explanations of poverty
people become adapted to certain ways of life because of the way they’re raised, including adapting to poverty
-argue that “culture of poverty” arises among people who experience extended periods of economic deprivation
-new norms, values, and aspirations merge and become independent of situations that produced them
–eliminating problem doesn’t eliminate behaviors made to deal with it
-results in self-sustaining system of values and behaviors handed down from one gen. to the next