Test 2- study guide Flashcards

1
Q

The definition of an argument

A

A sequence of statements, some of which give reason to accept another statement, called a conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The definition of validity

A

Reason to accept a conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

James’s thesis on the Will to Believe

A

There are times where must make a passionate decision between two possibilities that cannot be decided intellectually; we must fully commit and cannot be passive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The argument from design, or the teleological argument for the existence of God

A

Essentially that the universe biologically resembles human artifacts (also called analogical argument):
1. Artifacts come from intelligence 2. Universe resembles the artifacts 3. Universe is probably from intelligent design 4. Universe is significantly larger than human artifacts 5. There probably is a powerful and vastly intelligent designer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What metaphors do Locke and Leibniz use to describe the nature of the mind?

A

Locke- tabula rosa

Leibniz- block of marble

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hume on miracles

A

He finds miracles to be too improbable to believe; no testimony is sufficient unless the testimony’s falsehood would be more miraculous than that which it endeavors to establish; simply viewing miracles as a violation of law is incoherent, attacking human’s gullibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tertullian’s dictum

A

The reasoning that Zoran Kierkegaard argues for belief in God; I believe because it is absurd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What kind of skepticism does Descartes employ?

A

Methodic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What for Plato are objects of opinion or belief said to be what they are only in a qualified sense?

A

Ordinary objects perceived by the senses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Fideism?

A

The doctrine that religious faith is founded on faith, which is superior to reason

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the two mental operations that mathematics consists of according to Descartes?

A

Intuition-our understanding of self-evident principles, where no rational mind can doubt (2+2=4)
Deduction- orderly logical reasoning, inferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What branch of philosophy deals with the study of knowledge?

A

Epistemology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hume on miracles

A

He finds miracles to be too improbable to believe and the testimonies too weak

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The doctrine of innateness.

A

The idea involving the block of marble; we are born with all ideas innate in us but it is the blow of

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

For Hume, is there a place for philosophy?

A

Yes, so long as we limit our inquiries to things capable of human understanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Locke’s view concerning the origin of our ideas?

A

He is an empiricist, meaning that he believes all of our ideas come from experience

17
Q

Pascal’s Wager

A

Believing in and following God is a bet with the possibility of infinite winnings and no opportunity for loss

18
Q

What is Hume’s criterion regarding testimony about miracles?

A

no testimony is sufficient unless the testimony’s falsehood would be more miraculous than that which it endeavors to establish; simply viewing miracles as a violation of law is incoherent, attacking human’s gullibility

19
Q

According to Leibniz, what do the truths of mathematics depend on?

A

Not on instances nor consequently on the testimonies of senses, so it must depend on innate principles independent of these that are simply discovered through the senses; a priori