Test 2 (General) Flashcards
How was the veto power originally supposed to be used?
Only if the president thought the bill was unconstitutional
Who originally was given the power to “make war”? Why was this changed?
Originally, the constitution said - Congress shall have the power to “make war”. If congress was not in session they could not be the military executive, so it was changed so they had the power to “declare war”. This was not thought to be a major change.
How was the power to declare war shown to be hollow?
The power to declare war was shown to be hollow underneath the presidency of James Polk (19th) who wanted to “acquire” Texas. In order to accomplish this he sent american troops into texas so that mexico would respond and declare war. Mexico did not respond, so he sent them further. This happened again until they reached the Rio Grande. Mexico did respond, and US had it’s war. Showed that Congress did not have the ability to make war under the current language.
How was Polk reprimanded?
“Resolution of Censure” for exceeding authority. Lincoln (young congressman from illinois) was convinced that Polk was exceeding his power, led the charge to reprimand Polk.
Describe the Boxer rebellion.
- US pres sent American troops to China without Congressional Approval. Rebels backed by China seized the embassy of america, britain, france, italy, etc.
Describe the Curtiss-Wright decision
- Defined President as the “sole organ” of foreign policy
Describe the changing of war-making responsibilities in the 1930s-41
FDR created war making agencies
“I request that Congress make these agencies- but if you don’t I will”.
President had powers to take foreign policy into his hands if he thought it was an emergency
Describe the changing of war-making responsibilities in the Nuclear Age
Tremendous transfer of war making authority to the president
Very little congressional involvement in either vietnam or korea.
President truman sent troops without informing congress
president ordered bombings without informing congress
Describe the Gulf of Tonkin resolution
Johnson convinced Congress to pass to allow him to have great authority in the buildup of a huge conflict that he partially orchestrated
“Any means necessary”
Describe the goal and effect of the War Powers Act
- Limitations against president to use force. Good in theory but every president since nixon has considered it to be unconstitutional.
Describe the four points behind the War Powers Act
1 President should consult with congress before using american troops in conflict
2 President has 48hrs after troops have been introduced into battle to send a report about why troops have been sent to a combat situation
3 President has 60-90 days to keep those troops in combat unless congress declares war or passes a resolution giving president the right to put those troops into battle.
What if he doesn’t do that? - He could be impeached- not likely; Resolution of Censure; Congress could cut off funding- not likely (They couldn’t get the troops back.)
in effect, the president still has the ability to declare war on his own authority
4. Congress can order the troops out by passing a concurrent resolution Does not require presidential signature Congress would become commander and chief Seems to give some teeth to the war powers act- supreme court however declared unconstitutional so DOES NOT APPLY
Describe the concept of a Nuclear Triad
The ability to launch nukes from bombers, land, and sea. If there is an attack against the United States that destroyed two of the three, we could still retaliate
Who is the often the most influential person in the executive branch besides the president?
Chief of Staff. Chief of Staff is at the center of most activities, protects the presidents time.
Describe the Rule of Propinquity
Those who are closest to the president have the most influence. (Chief of Staff, National Security Advisor brief the president daily).
Describe the varying levels of power carried by the Secretary of State.
Secretary of State may or may not be the most influential person in foreign policy making. Secretary of State is often handicapped by the need to travel in terms of relationship with president.
Describe how the National Security advisor was stronger than the secretary of state in the Iran 1979 Hostage Crisis and the result of that crisis.
Carter selected a military option.
American special forces would fight their way through and rescue the American diplomats. The secretary of state was unaware of this going on, he resigned because of this.
Outcome: The helicopters broke down in the desert- america is a weak country->carter is a weak president-> elect reagan
Describe the potential gap between the white house staff and cabinet staff.
White house staff are usually very young and energetic/idealistic. Cabinet staff are older and used to getting their way.
Describe the Wheel Model of staff organization. How did Roosevelt use it?
Rarely used anymore. Purpose is to maximize information that goes to the president. Chiefs, aids, and assistants report directly to president.
Last president to try this model was JFK- he had no chief of staff. FDR also used this model.
Franklin Roosevelt was kinda devious (good way), he would give people the same assignment/project- he intentionally wanted there to be conflict among his aids. He wanted to know about everything in his cabinet.
Describe the Pyramid Model of staff organization. How did Nixon use it?
Chief of Staff serves as filter. Everything that is seen by the president is determined by the Chief of Staff. Chief of Staff has lots of power- maybe too much.
Richard Nixon’s Chief of Staff was present when the president was meeting with the secretaries. He would take notes.
Describe the Ad-hoc Model of staff organization. How did Clinton use it?
Combination of the first two, there is still the Chief of Staff who filters and protects the Presidents time. There are special task forces who report directly to the president
Clinton had a special task force with a goal of getting everyone health insurance. Despite a democratically controlled House and Senate this didn’t go through (Control of all three does not yield absolute power).
Should we be as involved as we are in world affairs? Europe? South Korea?
If there was a nuclear war the world would be devastated - The US should probably be involved in making sure that doesn’t happen.
Last time this happened was 1999, pakistani military was putting their weapons in position to use
Why should we be involved in Europe?
US in europe allows us to project power.
Base in Turkey is helpful
Why should we defend South Korea?
South Korea wants us there
Control over China