Terms of a contract Flashcards
define a term
‘what the parties have agreed between themselves and define the extent and limit of their respective obligations’
what is a representation
a pre-contractual statement
if representation is broken, what is the innocent party’s action for
misrepresentation
if a term is broken, what is the innocent party’s actions for
breach of contract
what are the 4 guidelines for distinguishing between a term or representation
- the importance attached to the representation
- special knowledge/ skill of party making the representation
- time between making representation + contract
- whether agreement including the statement is in writing
what case refers to the first guideline (the importance attached to the representation) + LP
Chouchman v Hill - statement to farmer was so important that farmer could claim for breach of contract
in what case did the dealer relying on their own skill result in the statement not being a term, just misrepresentation
Oscar Chess Ltd. v Williams
in what case did the representor using their own special knowledge result in the representation becoming a term
Dick Bently Ltd. v Harold Smith Motors
what case sates that the lapse of time between making the representation and the contract was too wide so the representation did not become a term
Routledge v McKay
what case states that, where a contract is in writing, and a statement made orally between parties is not included, the courts generally infer that it was not intended to form part of a contract, so is mere representation
Routledge v McKay
what are expressly agreed terms
the terms of a contract
what are implied terms
terms implied into a contract even though they do not appear in a written agreement/ oral negotiations
terms are implied for 1 of 2 reasons - what are these
- court trying to give effect to the intention of the parties (TERMS IMPLIED BY FACT)
- law requires certain obligations are included in a contract (TERMS IMPLIED BY LAW)
what are the 4 examples of terms implied by fact
1) to give ‘business efficacy’ to a commercial agreement
2) terms implied by custom or habit
3) because of prior conduct of contracting parties
4) terms implied by statute
explain ‘terms implied to give business efficacy to a commercial agreement’ with a case and the 2 tests
court will apply a term if necessary to make sure a contract works on a business like basis.
2 tests set out in The Moorcock for a term to be implied:
1. term needed to make contract effective
2. parties had thought of it, would they have agreed that suggested term was obviously going to be in the contract?
in what case was a term implied into a contract as it existed as a matter of custom
Hutton v Warren
explain ‘terms implied because of prior conduct of contracting parties’ with a case
where parties to a contract have a prior history of dealing on particular terms, if those terms are not included in a later contract they may be implied into it if the parties are dealing in otherwise similar terms - Hillas v Arcos
what is the official bystander test and what case does it come from
test to identify if a term will be implied into a contract - Shirlaw v Southern Foundries
what are terms implied by statute
terms which parliament decided should automatically be included in all contracts of a particular type
what are the 3 terms implied by statute
i) The Consumer Rights Act 2015
ii) The Sale of Goods Act 1979
iii) Supply of Goods & Services Act 1982