Termination, Breach, Damages and Equitable Remedies Flashcards
Breach Definition
Where a party without lawful excuse fails or refuses to perform what is due under the contract
Remedy for a breach is Affirmation and damages or Termination
Party Alleging Breach has a burden of proof
When May plaintiff terminate?
When 1 party refuses to perform or is unwilling to perform or fails to perform, it gives the innocent party a right to terminate the contract and seek damages
Repudiatory Conduct
Universal cargo Carriers v Citati
The Luxmar
Eminence Property developments v Heaey
Termination will be allowed/ may be allowed on:
Breach of a Condition
Union Eagle v Golden Achievement
On construction of Contract:
Schüler v Wickman
See Innominate terms effect
Anticipatory breach
Contract requires performance on a certain day and it is very clear that the performance will not be possible because of the other party making that clear, you can terminate and sue for damages before performance required
Hochester v De La Tour
Affirmation of Contract
Innocent party can choose to affirm the contract and claim damages instead.
This is not possible if the repudiatory breach by conduct is continuing after affirmation
Johnson v Agnew
White & Carter Councils v Macgregor
Damages purpose
To compensate the injured party got lose suffered by a breach that causes the loss
Damages for Discomfort
Only claimable in cases of Holidays
Jarvis v Swan Tours
Jackson v Horizon Holidays
Damages for injury to reputation
Only recoverable where One party has a duty of Care
Malik v BCCI
Expectation Interest
Put parties where they would expect to be at the end of the contract (mostly this one)
D buys a car for 20k its worth 25k but defective so worth 10k
25k-10k=15k
Reliance Interest:
Put the parties where they would have been before they relied on the contract; back to the beginning before promise made to their detriment
Usually for a party that has done a bad deal
D buys a car for 20k worth 15k and defective so worth 10k
20k-10k=10k
Restitution Interest
Innocent party gets to choose between reliance or expectation interest; rare:
Innocent Party (c)
1) D is enriched
2) enriched at C’s expense
3) unjust for D to retain benefit without compensation C
How to measure the Loss
Reasonable Valuation of loss:
Paula Lee v Zehil
South Australia Asset management v York Montague
Loss of Amenity ( won’t use damages for the intended purpose of fixing)
Ruxley v Forsyth
Tito v Waddell
If Damages cause Loss of income they can be recoverable if:
Aerospace Publishing v Thames Water
1) Diversion of staff
2) caused significant disruption to business
3) reasonable to infer that revenue would have been generated
Remoteness
can’t claim for damages for loss suffered if you can’t show that breach caused Loss
Hadley v Baxendale:
1) Arises naturally from the Breach itself; caused by Breach
2) If it would have been in contemplation of the parties at the time of contracting
Victoria Laundry v Newman
The Heron II
Parsons v Uttley Ingham
Duty to mitigate
1) Cant recover for any loss that could have been avoided by taking reasonable steps
2) Cant recover for any loss actually avoided
3) Cant recover for losses incurred while attempting to mitigate
Payzu v Suanders