Misrepresentation Flashcards
What is a Misrepresentation
A false statement of Fact or law made by one party to another
- It is not a term
- It induces the other party to enter into the contract
Misrepresentation makes a contract?
Voidable
- Either rescind the contract
- Affirm Contract and Seek Damages
Misrepresentation 4 Requirements
1) Unambiguous false statement of Fact or Law
2) Addressed to Misled Party
3) Intended to be Acted upon
4) Material and actually induced other party to enter into contract
Must Not be a puff/opinion/ or belief
Bisset v Wilkinson
Representation must be addressed to Mislead Party
Commercial Banking of Sydney v Brown
Misrepresentation must be an inducement to entering Contract
Mislead party must have relied on the Misrepresentation
Smith v Eric Bush
If you have no knowledge of msirep
If you don’t know about the misrepresentation they it didn’t induce you and it doesn’t operate
Horsefall v thomas
If you know Misrepresentation is false
if you know its false and enter the contract anyways then you are bound by it
Atwood v Small
Fraudulent Misrepresentation (3 requirements)
1) A statement that is False
2) You knowingly Made it
3) Without belief to the statements truth or very reckless as to its validity
Innocent Misrepresentation
You think that you are telling the truth but you are in fact Not
Misrepresentation Act s.2 (2)
Newbigging v Adams
Derry v Peek
Negligent Misrepresentation
Duty of Care Applies:
Party making the representation are not outright lying but due to their circumstances they should have better knowledge as to the statements validity and are held to a higher standard
Hedley Byrne v Heller
Esso v Marden
Misrepresentation Act 1967 (4 requirements)
1) Misrepresentation made to the other party in the contract and induced entering
2) Party Suffers Actual Loss as a result of misrep
3) Fiction of Fraud: If it would have been fraud had the representation been knowingly made; then we treat it as fraud
4) Reverse the Burden of Proof on Representor: They have to prove that they had reasonable grounds to believe in the facts truth then innocent
Spice Girls v Aprila
Howard Marine v Ogden
Damages for Fraudulent Misrepresentation
Tort of Deceit:
Aims to put the parties back to the position had the torn not been committed
-You must give back full compensation for all losses suffered!
East v Maurer
Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank N.A
Damages for Negligent Misrepresentation
Tort of Negligence:
Y is liable for all reasonably foreseeable losses
Misrepresentation Act Damages
Put X in a position he would have been had there been no misrepresentation but as if it had been made Fraudulently:
* Allows for Damages for all losses which flow directly from the transaction.
Innocent Misrep also now allows Damages in lieu of Rescission