Technological Progress Flashcards
Technological progress & firms
- firms can earn innovation rents by introducing new technology
- firms that can’t keep up will fail (creative destruction)
- output depends on labour input and the production shifts upward with technological progress
- modern workers use a greater amount of capital goofs
Cobb-Douglas Production function
output is a function of capital stock and labour
Y = AK^(alpha) x (N)^(1-alpha)
where
Y = output
K = capital stock
A = total factor productivity that also increases in the technology in use
alpha = share of capital stock used 0
assumptions for production functions
- function exhibits constant returns to scale
- technological progress is labour-saving
- Production function is characterised by diminishing returns to capital
production function simplified
Y = AK^alpha
Y/N = output per worker
K/N = capital per worker
shows that outer per worker depends on capital per worker and total factor productivity that includes technology
Technological progress and capital goods accumulation are complimentary
- new technologies require new machines
- technological advance is needed for increasingly capital intensive methods of production to be profitable
this allows a sustained increase in average living standards
Modelling technological progress
- assume diminishing returns to capital
- use a concave production function of output per worker against capital per worker
slope = marginal product of capital
- production function shifts up with technological progress
this increases the APL and offsets the diminishing marginal returns to capital making it profitable to invest domestically leading to increased capital intensity
- capital intensity higher with higher output per worker
Why does capital productivity remain constant over time in technology leaders?
these countries experienced a combination of capital accumulation and technological progress
Technological progress results in
- Process innovation - new ways of making and delivering products
- Product innovation - new varieties and qualities of products to the market
Job creation and destruction process
labour-saving technological progress can also create jobs
- reallocation of work from low to high productivity firms
- job creation is strongly pro cyclical whereas job destruction is countercyclical
Beveridge curve
shows the inverse relationship between the unemployment rate and the job vacancy rate
as unemployment rate rises, there’s less efficient job matching
- during recessions, firms post fewer vacancies
- in booms, they post more
- Newly posted vacancies are not filled instantly because of issues with labour market matching
Long run labour market model
output, employment, prices, wages, capital, institutions and technologies can adjust
long run employment depends on how well policies and institutions deal with
- work incentives - depends on long run WS curve
2. investment incentives - depends on long run PS curve
assumptions of long run labour market model
- firms are all of a given size
- changes in capital stock determined by entry or exit of firms
- constant returns to scale (CRS)
what determines how the number of firms change in the long run?
the markup, mew
- high markup attracts entry of firms, low promotes exit of firms
self-correcting process of number of firms
more firms means more competition leading to higher elasticity of demand facing firms, so leads to lower markup leading to exit of firms
mew = 1/elasticity of demand