Environmental Economics Flashcards

1
Q

Is the invisible hand enough?

A
  • Market failure - when market allocates resources in a Pareto-inefficient way
  • externality effects - an effect of an economic decision that isn’t specified as a benefit or liability in the contract
    eg. negative externality - passives smoking

positive externality - getting vaccinated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Marginal private cost (MPC)

A

marginal cost to decision maker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Marginal external cost (MEC)

A

costs imposed by decision maker on society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Marginal social cost (MSC)

A

MPC + MEC

negative external effect when MSC>MPC

in this case market outcome leads to overproduction (market failure)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Possible solutions to market failures

A
  1. Coasen bargaining - legally assign property rights
    e. g right to pollute, to clean air

issues include transaction costs, enforcement, missing info

  1. Regulation - ban or cap production
  2. Compensation - polluter may pay principle

Fair? poor people may or developing countries may pollute more (subsidising clean solutions might be better)

  1. Pigouvian tax/subsidy
    - tax/subsidy on firms generating negative/positive external effects in order to correct an inefficient market outcome

issues include missing info, measure MC, lobbying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pigouvian tax example

A

govt puts a per unit tax on output

tax is the difference between MSC and MPC

profit maximising producer chooses output where MPC = after tax price which is the socially optimal output

tax forces producers to face the full cost pf their decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Are markets good enough?

A

world commodity prices, inflation adjusted, have not changed much in the long run due growing demand pushing prices up but cheaper extraction technology pushing prices down

NO:

  • absence of prices for some natural resources (clean air)
  • changes (overfishing, deforestation) may become self-reinforcing due to positive feedback processes
    e. g Farming reduces forest area

deforestation reduces rainfall

drought conditions increases fire likelihood

fires reduce forest area and so process continues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Environmental dynamics

A

measure of sea ice now and in a year:

line of unchanging environment is 45 degree line

  • system moves towards an equilibrium
  • high stable equilibrium with extensive summer sea ice
  • tipping point is unstable equilibrium (middle)
  • low stable equilibrium with no summer ice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

at high stable equilibrium

A

lower temps leads to extensive summer ice, so solar radiation is reflected rather than absorbed

a virtuous cycle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

at low stable equilibrium

A

higher temps leads to no summer ice so solar radiation is absorbed rather than reflected

vicious cycle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

adding climate change to environmental dynamics curve

A

EDC shifts down as climate change reduces winter ice

the last tipping point disappears ( tipping point where EDC touches 45 degree line) and environmental collapse to the equilibrium without summer sea ice occurs

for the first time since records began, the Lapter sea has yet to start freezing by late October 2020

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Abatement policies

A

policies designed to reduce environmental damage

  • consuming less damaging good e.g cars
  • ban harmful substances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Abatement cost curve

A

shows the per-unit cost of abating greenhouse gas emissions abatement policies, ranked from the most cost-effect to the least - an MC curve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

least-cost abatement curve

A

curve shows all the combinations of environmental quality and cost of abatement, when the abatement technologies are adopted in ascending order of cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

feasible set of abatement curves

A

shows the trade-off between consumption and environmental quality

ideal policymakers indifference curves: slope = MRS

feasible frontier slope = MRT

MRT = marginal productivity of abatement expenditures

MRS = opportunity cost of abatement expenditure

want MRS = MRT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

optimal choice of point on abatement curve depends on

A
  • citizens value for the environment - affects MRS

- cost of abatement - affects MRT

17
Q

can the optimal abatement level change?

A

with technological progress:

  • can enlarge the feasible set by making abatement more efficient or reducing environmental costs of consumption
  • shifts feasible frontier up and indifference curves have higher utility

technological improvement increases the marginal productivity of abatement expenditure making the feasible frontier steeper

18
Q

solar energy example

A

subsidies to firms that produce solar panels has helped fund R&D in alternative energy sources

growing demand for solar panels led to a sharp decrease in their price, thanks to learning by doing in the production process

  • subsidies by gov
  • higher demand
  • more firms enter the market
  • more competition
  • innovation
  • decrease in solar panel cost
  • cheaper than coal
  • attraction for profit investment firms
19
Q

Win-Win policies

A

not always a tradeoff between consumption and environmental quality: some technologies are cost saving : e.g LED lights

20
Q

Unrealised potential

A

this abatement potential means that part of the feasible frontier has a positive slope. These unexploited mutual gains suggest more is needed than market incentives

21
Q

How can we implement the optimal abatement level?

A
  1. Price based policies
    - uses taxes and subsidies to affect prices
    - aim to internalise the external effects of individual choices
  2. Quantity based policies - use bans, caps and regulations
22
Q

Taxing consumers

A
  • taxes can create lifestyle changes (e.g tax on air travel)

new fuel tax will rotate budget constraint down and make the feasible frontier between air travel per year and free time steeper

reduces the feasible set - income effect

and encourages greater consumption of free time - substitution effect

23
Q

e.g banning harmful substances

A
  • ozone levels stabilised in the 1990s after Montreal Protocol
  • innovators pushing for bans to get innovation rents
  • regulation can spur innovation
24
Q

Cap and Trade policy

A

cap and trade creates a market for emissions:

  • gov sets a limit on pollution and creates enough permits to meet this cap
  • gov allows permits (e.g via auction) and firms buy/sell permits amongst themselves
  • cap and trade is a combined quantity-and-price-based policy

firms that have higher marginal private abatement costs (MPAC) will end up abating less after trading of permits

25
Q

Cap and trade pros

A
  • success: SO2 cap and trade scheme in the US in the 1990s to reduce acid rain
  • advantage: more flexible (cap, allocation, trade) and popular than tax on fossil fuels
  • expectations matter: firms may start cutting emissions if they expect lower caps in future
26
Q

Cap and trade cons

A
  • policymakers need to set the correct total level of abatement which isn’t easy to determine
  • putting a price on pollution may send the wrong signal to firms - e.g making pollution profitable if price is too low
    (a price floor on permits can mitigate the issue)
  • determining marginal private costs of abatement
27
Q

e.g EU emissions trading scheme

A
  • set too large a cap

the price fell dramatically after the 2008 crisis, providing little incentive to abate

cap since been lowered and prices have increased

28
Q

Value of abatement - measuring environmental costs and benefits

A
  1. Contingent valuation
  • use surveys to asses the value of nonmarket resources
  • a stated preference approach assumes respondents indicate their true preferences
  1. Hedonic pricing
    - uses prices of market goods to infer the economic value of unpriced attributes
    - a revealed preference approach uses behaviour as an indication of preferences
    - issue with using willingness to pay is that the rich can pay more, so have a higher WTP

policies improving environmental conditions affecting the poor valued less than policies affecting the rich

an alternative could be that a safe environment as a merit good - available to everybody, as primary education

29
Q

why is abatement so difficult?

A
  • gaps in scientific understanding
  • conflicts of interest - winners and losers , lobbying
  • need of international agreements
  • future generations don’t vote