Task 5: moral development, empathy, psychopathology Flashcards

1
Q

definition empathy

A
  • an effective state that:
  • is elicited by observing/imagining another’s affective state
  • is similar to the other’s emotional state
  • is caused by the other’s emotional state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

affective/emotional empathy

A
  • empathic concern, leads to compassionate responses to other’s emotional states
  • involved emotion understanding skills (recognition) and reactivity processes (emotion contagion)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

cognitive empathy

A
  • More advanced cognitive perspective-taking system
  • Involves theory of mind (distinguish own emotion from others) and empathic accuracy (infer feelings from behavior)
  • Associated with positive social behaviors

-Affective and cognitive empathy function independently, an empathic response may draw on either or both components

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

sex-differences

A
  • early adolescence girls more sensitive
  • adult males and females: comparable patterns of neural response to empathy-eliciting cues, despite sex differences in self-reported empathic experience
  • differences may reflect gendered social norms regarding the expression of empathic feelings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

genetic tendency toward empathy

A
  • genes modulate development and function of brain regions and systems that implement empathic experiences and responses
  • moderately strong genetic influences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

OXTR gene / oxytocin

A

?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Bottum-up processes - empathy

A
  • > affective empathy
  • Involuntary capacities to detect and respond to others’ affective cues by subcortical structures: amygdala, hypothalamus, hippocampus
  • > Begin to mature early
  • Anterior insula (cortical region) engages during affective empathy -> development more protracted (langwierig) than subcortical areas
  • hippocampus especially vulnerable in preschool years to environmental insults
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Oxytocin - empathy

A
  • modulates activity in the amygdala (can increase responsiveness in amygdala), midbrain regions and neural striatum
  • > can also weaken coupling of amygdala to brainstem regions implicated in autonomic and behavioral manifestations to fear: calming and bonding effects of oxytocin
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Top-down processes & empathy

A
  • emerge slightly later = cognitive empathy
  • medial and DLPFC: linked to cognitive empathy
  • mature slowly, synaptic trajectories extend into young adulthood
  • neural elements to experience cognitive empathy are present and engaged from birth, but elements interact and shape each other into adulthood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

dopamine - empathy

A
  • may be the primary modulator for prefrontal regions in top-down components of empathy
  • oxytocin and dopamine may interact here
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

empathic reactions that may facilitate emergence of internalizing problems

A

reactions to others’ distress that

1) are excessively aversive
2) involve excessive cognitive perspective-taking
3) result in self-focused comforting responses/self-focused rumination about one’s role in the observed distress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

2 subfactors of internalizing disorders

A

1) fear/arousal sub factor

2) anhedonia (Unfähigkeit Freude oder Lust zu empfinden)/misery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

fear/arousal sub factor

A

-underlies agoraphobia, social phobia, specific phobia, and panic disorder

genetic liability to physiological arousal + tendency to empathic sensitivity = contributes to neurobiological processes underlying personal distress because of others’ pain/unhappiness
-> increases risk for fear/arousal symptoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

anhedonia/misery subfactor

A

-explains covariance of MDD, dysthymic disorder, and GAD

Genetic tendency for negative thinking + empathic sensitivity = contributes to interpersonal guilt in response to others’ distress
-> Increases risk for anhedonia/misery

  • negative thought processes: habitual negative attribution and expectations, biased attention and memory, worry, rumination)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

inter-individual moderators

A

Moderators: maladaptive parenting, chronic exposure to parents’ negative affect -> interact with genes -> amplifies risk for distress and guilt and therefore internalizing problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

personal distress

A
  • linked to fear/arousal subfactor
  • maladaptive affective response to negative emotions in others
  • self-focused response, physiological hyperarousal, behavioral withdrawal
  • linked with anxiety, guilt, depression
  • associations with neuroticism, burnout, behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

interpersonal guilt

A
  • maladaptive form of cognitive empathy
  • excessive and irrational altruistic concerns: e.g. unreasonable beliefs that one is responsible for alleviating the suffering of others and intense worries about harming others
  • linked to loneliness and alienation, depression and anxiety
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

5HTTLPR as intraindividual moderator

A
  • SS:
  • elevated HPA axis reactivity, elevated cortisol
  • measures of hyperarousal
  • stronger startle potentiation in fear conditioning paradigms
  • linked to biased attention for emotional stimuli
  • attentional vigilance toward threat cues

Study in children had less consistent findings:
> Attentional biases to avoid sad cues were amplified in 8 to 12 yo offspring of depressed mothers, particularly if expressing S or Lg alleles

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

environmental exposure (family) and empathy

A
  • Link between effective parenting (secure attachment, providing support, and encouraging emotional expression) and healthy empathic development
  • Effects of inadequate parenting -> particularly potent in youths who carry a genetically mediated neurobiological liability for empathic sensitivity
  • Maladaptive parenting behavior may skew children’s empathic development toward problematic outcomes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

fostering healthy empathic development

A
  • Intraindividual and interindividual moderators exerts greatest influence during early childhood
  • Improve parents’ knowledge about contexts and experiences that distress their child
  • Relieving parent depression and/or chronic stress: indirect benefit for offspring
  • Decreasing cognitive and emotional dysregulation difficulties in very young children
  • Addressing cognitive biases -> unclear if this is appropriate/effective for preschoolers
  • Intranasally administered oxytocin may improve social cognition and emotion regulation in internalizing conditions (social anxiety) or autism (empathy deficit)
21
Q

5 months vs 8 months reaction to antisocial others

A

5: evaluated actors solely on the basis of the local valence of their actions (good/bad)
8: preferred individuals who acted positively toward prosocial others and preferred those who acted negatively to antisocial others
- 8 months: infants capable of evaluating third-party social behaviors that goes beyond simple ‘prosocial = good’, ‘antisocial = bad’

22
Q

toddlers: giving/taking a treat

A

-Giving-a-treat: toddlers gave a treat more often to prosocial puppet
-Taking-a-treat: toddler took treat more often from antisocial puppet
> Toddlers avoided taking from the individual (victim) who already suffered antisocial treatment from a third party -> empathic behavior

23
Q

conduct disorder

A
  • Childhood behavior disorder, characterized by persistent aggressive/antisocial behavior
  • Some children with conduct disorder have psychopathic traits
24
Q

2 forms of psychopathic traits

A

1) callous - unemotional component (psychopathic)

2) impulsive - antisocial

25
callous unemotional component of psychopathic traits
2 out of 4 must be met: lack of remorse/guilt, callousness (lack of empathy), lack of concern about performance, shallow/deficient affect - > reduced empathic response to distress of others - > linked to decrease amygdala response
26
impulsive-antisocial component of psychopathic traits
- deficits in decision making and in reinforcement learning | - > dysfunction in the ventromedial PFC and striatum
27
communicatory function of emotional empathy
understand emotional cues of others, learning social value of actions/objects -> important for appropriate decision making
28
reduced emotional empathy - brain
reduced amygdala and vmPFC responsiveness to distress
29
impaired decision making - brain
dysfunction in vmPFC and striatum
30
Impaired processing of distressing cues and happy expressions -> reduced aversion for actions that harm others
Reduced amygdala response to fearful expressions -reduced amygdala and rostral medial frontal cortex response to pain expression Response is not completely absent -If intensity of emotional stimulus is increased -> recognition of fearful expression
31
Youths with Psychopathic traits: Deficits in processes underlying aversive conditioning:
Passive avoidance learning, operant extinction, reversal learning - Deficits in capacity to link outcomes with stimuli/responses - Dysfunction within amygdala, striatum, vmPFC
32
Disrupted prediction error signaling
Result in poorer, slower learning of reinforcements with objects/actions - Reduced vmPFC response to receipt of a reward (involved in encoding received rewards) , striatum - Prediction error needed for effective use of reinforcement outcome info
33
Poor at using and representing expected value information - consequence and brain
- > might impair decision making | - vmPFC
34
Response to punishments that are worse than expected
-increased responses in vmPFC and striatum (in healthy ones this is reduced)
35
summary emotional learning and decision making in psychopaths
reduced representation of reward outcomes and expected values in the vmPFC & reduced reward prediction error signaling & potentially highly atypical punishment prediction error signaling in the striatum
36
amygdala in psychopathic traits
reduced volume
37
temporal cortex in conduct disorder
-reduced volume and thickness
38
Unikate fasiculus
- possible disruption in that area and the white-matter tract that connects amygdala and frontal lobe - functional anisotropy in white-matter tract (psychopathic)
39
environment and psychopathic traits
- Exposure to high threat levels (abuse/family violence) - neglect - > heightened amygdala responses to threat - increased risk of reactive aggressive - maternal substance abuse during pregnancy - > Increases likelihood of callous-unemotional traits
40
genes involved in psychopathic traits
L allele in 5HTTLPR MAOA COMT - Variants of these genes Associated with reduced amygdala response to threat -> risk for being more callous, unemotional - Increased aggressiveness
41
treatment implications psychopathic traits
- Difficult to treat - social and emotional learning prevention strategies may be helpful: development of emotional regulation, relationship skills and responsible decision making - Multidimensional treatment foster care and multisystemic therapy - Different types of conduct disorder might need different therapies
42
treatment psychopathic traits with dopamine
-Some dysfunctions regarding psychopathic traits can be mimicked through manipulation of the serotoninergic and dopaminergic systems > Dopamine antagonists reduce amygdala responsiveness to threat stimuli > Dopamine agonists increase amygdala response to fearful expressions -Atypical antipsychotic drugs can be efficient in treatment of aggression
43
1 year old - empathy normal development
demonstrate capacity to exhibit distress when confronted with others’ negative affect & to orient attention towards distressed others
44
2 year old - empathy normal development
better able to differentiate themselves form others, more capable of directing their concern externally -In first few years of life: ability to reason about others’ goals and intentions
45
3 year old - empathy normal development
relatively stable levels of empathy
46
preschool and school - empathy normal development
capable of prosocial behaviors based on empathic feelings (as a function of cognitive and behavioral competences)
47
middle childhood - empathy normal development
manage feelings with cognitive strategies | > Link between maturing emotion regulation capacities & emergence of empathic skills (influence in both directions)
48
adolescence - empathy normal development
patterns of empathic responding remain stable, some skills increase,