Task 5 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

resilience =

A

= “bouncing back” from difficult experience (stress, trauma, tragedy)
o its indicated by adaptive stress responses, rapid stress recovery, high coping self-efficacy, strong cognitive re-appraisal and emotion regulation and self-confidence
o lack of resilience increases the risk for developing stress-related psychiatric disorders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

heritability of resiliance (an overview)

o twin studies?
- correlations?

A
  • resilience is influenced by genetic factors –> heritable component
    o show in twin studies, but proportion of genetic impact between studies varied a lot
  • genetic correlation between emotion-oriented coping and resilience -> indicates a common genetic background
  • shared heritability between resilience and some psychiatric disorders (anxiety disorder, depression, PTSD - negative association)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

candidate genes of the stress response system - serotonin/ 5-HT

A

(- the serotonergic system influences the HPA axis)

  • gene SLC6A4 encodes serotonin transporters which carry serotonin away from the synapse after signal transmission for later reuse
  • within the promoter region of SLC6A4, there is the polymorphism 5-HTTLPR (=serotonin-transporter-linked polymorphic region) –> influences the ability to encode transporter proteins

o 5-HTTLPR can have short or long alleles –> 3 possible genotypes: ss, ll, sl
o Short allele –> reduced expression of serotonin transporters (reduced serotonin uptake)
–> associated with lower resilience :(
o Long allele –> increased number of serotonin transporters (SERT)

  • studies suggest a gene x environment interaction - risk for stress-related disorders:
    o S-carriers are more likely to develop a disorder following environmental stress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

candidate genes of the stress response system - DA and NE

- VNTR
- Rs1800497
which gene is affected? what does it do?
- COMT

A
  • differences in striatal dopamine transporter (DAT) density in PTSD patients compared to healthy –> suggests influence of the dopaminergic system on vulnerable phenotypes + resilience
-	2 genetic variants in genes of the dopaminergic system with increased susceptibility to PTSD and depression were detected: 
o	VNTR (=variable number tandem repeat) is a genetic polymorphism in the promoter region of the DAT gene (SCL6A3)
o	Rs1800497 polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D2 gene (DRD2) --> regulates synaptic modification in response to stress
  • one enzyme affecting both systems -> COMT (breaks down DA + NE)
    o Met allele –> decreased COMT enzyme activity –> higher NE and dopamine levels
    –> greater risk for development of PTSD/depression after trauma or adversity –> lower resilience :(
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

candidate genes of the stress response system - HPA axis

  • why is it interessting?
  • CRHR1
  • FKBP5
A
  • The HPA axis = most important physiological stress response system -> genetic variants in this system likely influencing resilience + contribute to psychiatric disorders (in vulnerable phenotypes)
  • some polymorphisms of the CRHR1 (=corticotropin-releasing hormone receptor 1) - associated with reduced! risk of depression after exposure to life stress
  • elevated levels of FKBP5 (protein role in immunregulation) -> decreased negative feedback regulation of the HPA axis
    (and glucocorticoid receptor resistance)
    -> probably responsible for a dysfunctional stress response –> interacts with environmental trauma to predict PTSD
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

candidate genes of the stress response system - Neuropeptide Y

  • what is it?
  • resilience ass.?
A
  • Neuropeptide Y acts as neuromodulator in the brain –> it counteracts effects of the corticotrophin-releasing hormone -> necessary for the compensation of stress reaction
  • some polymorphisms in the NPY gene are associated with lower NPY expression –> lower resilience to stress risk for several disorders in case of early life stress
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

candidate genes of the stress response system - neural and synaptic placticity

  • Neurotrophic hypothesis of MDD
  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor
A
  • depression associated with impaired structural plasticity and cellular resilience
  • the neurotrophin BDNF is involved in the regulation of synaptic plasticity, neurogenesis, neuronal survival and differentiation
    > BDNF levels are affected by stress in PTSD and depression - alternations in BDNF might contribute to a variety of psychiatric disorders (PTSD, anxiety, depression)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

GWAS

  • gwas on resilience
  • gwas on ptsd and deperession
A
  • Genome-wide association studies - new way for scientists to identify genes involved in human disease
    = method: searches the genome for small variations, called single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) occuring more frequently in people with a particular disease
    –> hypothesis-free detection of genetic variants associated with specific phenotypes
  • GWAS recently performed on resilience:
    o SNP-based heritability estimated 16%
    o some genome-wide significant hits were obtained (although sample was small)
    o DCLK2 (=a member of the doublecortin family of kinases) –> promotes survival and regeneration of neurons –> also possible that alters brain structure or cognitive function and thus resilience
    o NR3C2
    –> there are potential gene candidates for resiliece
  • Since so little studies on resilience, it makes sense to look at psychiatric disorders that result of a lack of resilience (eg. PTSD or depression) –> indirect imlpications
    o several risk factors for PTSD: retinoid-related orphan receptor alpha (RORA), LINCO1090, etc.
    o upregulation of BICC1 might be involved in depression (antidepressants that improve symptoms reduce the expression of BICC1)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS BETWEEN STRESS AND 5-HTTLPR IN DEPRESSION: A META-ANALYTIC UPDATE (BLEYS) - Method

What will be tested?

A
    1. meta-analysis investigated total effect size and publication bias
    1. stratified meta-analyses investigated the potential moderating influence of different methodological approaches on heterogeneity in study findings
      o dimensional vs. categorical assessment
      o self-report vs. interview-based assessment
      o timing of stress (childhood vs. adulthood)
    1. meta-regression investigated combined influence of methodological approaches on overall effect size
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS BETWEEN STRESS AND 5-HTTLPR IN DEPRESSION: A META-ANALYTIC UPDATE (BLEYS) - Results

  1. Meta-analysis
  2. Stratified meta-analysis
  3. Meta-regression

–>

A
  1. Meta-analysis
    - no evidence of publication bias
    - small but significant effect of 5-HTTLPR in interaction with stress –> predicting depression
    - moderate to high heterogeneity between studies
  2. Stratified meta-analysis
    - heterogeneity of effect sizes = result of outliers - not due to different methodological approaches towards assessment of stress and depression
    o none of the examined moderators (assessment type or timing of stress) had a significant influence on the heterogeneity of effect sizes of the GxE effect
    o excluding outliers reduces heterogeneity
  3. Meta-regression
    - combined set of predictors explained 42% of heterogeneity
    - some evidence that studies adopting a categorical and interview approach to the assessment of stress report higher GxE effects (further replication needed)

–> meta-analysis provides new evidence for the robustness of the interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR in depression!!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTIONS BETWEEN STRESS AND 5-HTTLPR IN DEPRESSION: A META-ANALYTIC UPDATE (BLEYS) - Limitaitons

A
  • large amount of heterogeneity (46%) was not explained
  • meta-analysis did not control for other possible moderators (gender, ethnicity, personality traits etc.)
  • low response rate of invited studies (only 48% of the eligible studies could be included)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Heritabiltity of depression

  • how much?
  • genes involved?
  • why difficulties in robustly identifying genetic cotributors?
    o
A
  • genetic component to depression (heritability estimates vary from 37-70%)
  • genetic association studies have identified some candidate genes: 5HTTLPR, APOE, DRD4, GNB3, HTR1A, MTHER and SLC6A3
o	heterogeneity (in diagnostics) 
o	might be multiple tiny genetic effects (need larger samples) 
o	complex interplay between genes and environmental factors 
  • but, strong association between stress and depression!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

methodological issues regarding stress assessment
o interview vs. self-report
o direction of causality?

A

o research confirmed that semi-structured interviews are more accurate and effective than simple questionnaires
o Does mental state influence the event or does the event evoke depression? –> acute life events consistently predict the onset of a depressive episode, but childhood stress has been shown to increase risk of depression in adulthood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How to define life events? (considerations)

  • heritability of life events?
    o
  • different findings in 5HTTPR –> why?
A

o study: relatives of depressed subjects not only have an increased risk of depression, but also appeared to have an elevated rate of threatening events
o Twin studies: suggest modest, but significant heritable component to self-reported life events
o BUT parental reports of life events for the same adolescents -> no evidence of heritability

  • contradictory findings in studies investigating gene x environment interactions on the risk of depression (5HTTLPR x stressful life events) –>
    inconsistency might be due to how life events were assessed/defined
    o studies using subjective self-report reported no interaction
  • might also be that the s-allele of the 5HTTLPR polymorphism confers a differential sensitivity to the environment, which can be negative or beneficial
    o children with s-allele were more vulnerable to depression at high stressful live event exposure, but showed reduced rates of depression at low stressful event exposure (benefit from better environment)
  • also, the GxE interactions could be mediated by epigenetic mechanisms (DNA methylation)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

INTERACTION BETWEEN THE 5-HTTLRP GENOTYPE, IMPACT OF STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS, AND TRAIT NEUROTICISM ON DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS (MARKUS) - Method

  • hypothesis
  • sample
  • measurement
  • biallelic vs. triallelic
A
  • Hypothesis: s-allele genotypes, compared to l-allele genotypes, are more susceptible to the effects of life events when they are high on trait neuroticism
  • Sample: 771 healthy individuals (595 women and 176 men); aged 21.0±2.1 years
  • Measurement: genotype for the 5-HHTLPR polymorphism, depressive symptoms, neuroticism, negative life events (self-report)
    o Eg.: divorce of parents, suicide attempts in self/family/friend, victim of fire, financial problems, violence within family
    o ratings of the events’ impact (“no impact” to “very negative”)
    o outcome measure = sum of impact rating of all experienced events
-	data were analysed and reported for: 
o	biallelic: L/S classification 
-->	without controlling for Lg and La differences
o	triallelic: L’/ S’ classification 
-->	including Lg and La differences
-->	Lg = S’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

INTERACTION BETWEEN THE 5-HTTLRP GENOTYPE, IMPACT OF STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS, AND TRAIT NEUROTICISM ON DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS (MARKUS) - Results

Effects of 5-HTTLPR, impact of life events and neuroticism on depression sores:

  • main effects
  • interaction effects

Effects of 5-HTTLPR & neuroticism on impact of life events:

  • main effect
  • interaction effect

Effects of 5-HTTLPR on neuroticism sores:

  • main effect
  • interaction effect
A

Effects of 5-HTTLPR, impact of life events and neuroticism on depression sores:

  • Main effects of neuroticism & impact of life events –> both factors associated independently with higher depression scores
  • No main effect of the 5-HTTLPR genotype on depressive symptomatology –> no differences in depression scores between S, La and Lg carriers
  • Significant 3-way interaction: only S-carriers showed vulnerability to depression exclusively when exposure to high-impact events + showed high neuroticism
  • -> results were similar for a biallelic and a triallelic approach

Effects of 5-HTTLPR & neuroticism on impact of life events:

  • Main effect of neuroticism: S and LL carriers with high trait neuroticism experienced comparable variability of impact of life events
  • No effect of genotype & no interaction of genotype and neuroticism

Effects of 5-HTTLPR on neuroticism sores:

  • No main effect of genotype on neuroticism score
  • No interaction between genotype x impact of life events on neuroticism score
17
Q

INTERACTION BETWEEN THE 5-HTTLRP GENOTYPE, IMPACT OF STRESSFUL LIFE EVENTS, AND TRAIT NEUROTICISM ON DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS (MARKUS) - Conclusion

A
  • depression is unlikely to be directly linked to the mutual interaction of one gene and one environmental factor
  • there are additional mediating factors in link between genes, environment and risk for depression
    o personal psychological resilience
    o cognitive vulnerability to attribute events as highly threatening = neuroticism

–> Findings suggests: 5-HTTLPR –> cognitive vulnerabilities (mediator) –> life event (genotype x environmetal interaction) –> depression

18
Q

DOES PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE BUFFER AGAINST THE LINK BETWEEN 5-HTTLPR POLYMORPHISM AND DEPRESSION FOLLOWING STRESS? (SHARPLEY) - Whats it about?

  • What is investigated?
  • What is the aim?
A
  • study investigates the associations between:

o 5-HTTLPR and depression
o 5-HTTLPR and psychological resilience
o psychological resilience and depression

  • develop a model of these interactions –> informs clinical practice + help to explain the previous inconsistent findings regarding the 5-HTTPR – depression link
19
Q

DOES PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE BUFFER AGAINST THE LINK BETWEEN 5-HTTLPR POLYMORPHISM AND DEPRESSION FOLLOWING STRESS? (SHARPLEY) - Methods

  • hypotheses
  • sample
  • measures
A
  • study tested the comparative strength of 5-HTTLPR polymorphism as predictor of depression after major stress vs. the protective effect of psychological resilience against depression after major stress –> 2 hypotheses
  1. PCa patients who are carriers of the ss-allele will have higher depression scores than carriers of the ll-allele
  2. PCa patients with higher PR will have lower depression scores than patients with lower PR scores
  • Sample: homogeneous group of older men who had all received a diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer
    o naturally occurring, objective stressor (no self-report or interview)
    o associated with elevated rates of depression
    o homogeneous group to reduce possible confounding influence of age and gender
  • Depression -> PHQ9
  • Psychological resilience -> CDRISC
    (?) considering multiple levels to identify which level influences the 5-HTTLPR – depression link
    o Scale level
    o Factor level:
    –> personal competence, high standards and tenacity
    –> trust in one’s instincts, tolerance of negative affect
    –> positive acceptance of change
    –> control
    –> spiritual influences
    o Item level
20
Q

DOES PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE BUFFER AGAINST THE LINK BETWEEN 5-HTTLPR POLYMORPHISM AND DEPRESSION FOLLOWING STRESS? (SHARPLEY) - Results

  • hypothesis 1
  • hypothesis 2
A
  • no association between 5-HTTLPR and elevated depression after stress –> reject hypothesis 1
    o no difference in depression scores of ss vs. ll carriers following a major stressor
  • association between psychological resilience and lower depression after stress
  • -> support hypothesis 2

o Scale level: inverse correlation between total scores of CDRISC and PHQ9
o Factor level:
–> Regression analysis: only factor 1 (personal competence ect.) significant inverse contribution to depression score –> most “protective” aspect of PR
o Item level: only item 10 “to give my best effort, no matter what” was significantly associated with the 5-HTTLPR: L-carriers had significant inverse correlation between PR scores and depression scores

21
Q

DOES PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE BUFFER AGAINST THE LINK BETWEEN 5-HTTLPR POLYMORPHISM AND DEPRESSION FOLLOWING STRESS? (SHARPLEY) - Discussion
Conclusion

A

DISCUSSION

  • specific associations between depression and single aspects of PR –> possible that due to the heterogeneity of PR measures, previous studies have missed this association
  • -> specific aspects of psychological resilience have a protective function against depression following major stressor
  • further studies should focus on “key dimensions” underlying protective function of PR for application in therapeutic settings

CONCLUSIONS

  • Data suggests that S-carrier of 5-HTTLPR may negate the protective effect of psychological resilience against depression in these men OR that psychological resilience may nullify the depression vulnerability in s-carriers of the 5-HTTLPR
  • may explain some of the “null” findings regarding the link between the 5-HTTLPR and depression in the wider literature –> it might be due to an interaction between these two factors in the association between major stress and depression
  • study does not contradict, but complement and extend the presence of contradictory findings