TASK 3 - PROBLEM SOLVING Flashcards
problem solving
- problem exists when someone lacks relevant knowledge to produce immediate solution
- purposeful, goal-directed
- involves controlled, rather than automatic processes
types of problems
- well-defined problems = all aspects of the problem are clearly specified (= initial state, goal, methods available) (e.g. maze or chess)
- used in research: there’s an optimal strategy and errors/deficiencies can easily be identified - ill-defined problems = definition of problem is underspecified, initial state, goal state & methods unclear (e.g. keys locked in car)
- most everyday problems - knowledge-rich problems = can only be solved with prior knowledge
- knowledge-lean problems = can be solved without prior knowledge, necessary info is provided by problem statement
cynefin framework (LECTURE)
A. predictable problems:
- simple problems: easy to find solution; recipe for cooking
- complicated problems: need expertise to solve
B. unpredictable problems:
- complex problems: experimenting to find solution
- chaotic problems: no idea how to solve problems; if not convert into complex problem ‘worst case’
–> problems can develop back and forth (one step at a time)
factors influencing problem solving
- past experience
- generally increases ability to solve problems
BUT - functional fixedness = inability to detach from usual function of an object; assume that any given object has a limited number of uses (e.g. candle + box of nails)
- mental set/einstellung = using strategy previously useful, but in current situation not helpful; use a familiar strategy even where there is a simpler/more effective alternative
factors influencing problem solving
- incubation
- problem is solved more easily when it is put aside for some time (Wallas)
- stronger effect for creative problems with multiple solutions & when long preparation time prior to
hypotheses: - Wallas: subconscious keeps processing
- Simon: forget control information which makes it easier to adopt a new approach
factors influencing problem solving
- expertise
- chunking theory: memory chunks contain more information & more chunks are stored
- template theory: chunks that are used frequently develop into more complex data structures –> few large templates (= more general) rather than large number of chunks
- template = core (= similar to fixed info stored in chunks) + slots (=contain variable info) thus are more flexible - routine expertise = using acquired knowledge to solve familiar problems efficiently (focus of template theory)
- adaptive expertise = using acquired knowledge to develop strategies for dealing with novel problems
- BEHAVIOURISM
- Thorndike
- trial-and-error learning
x reproductive thinking
- GESTALT
a. main hypothesis
- problem solving requires productive thinking
2.
b. prior history
- Wolfgang Köhler
insight
= experience of suddenly realising how to solve a problem “ahaaaa experience”; productive thinking - replacing one way of thinking about a problem with a new & more efficient way (cognitive conflict)
- non-insight problems: “warmth” (closeness to solution) gradually rises
- insight problems: warmth stays rather low until it suddenly rises before solution
2.
c. concepts
(1) reproductive vs. productive reproductive thinking = re-use knowledge productive thinking = understand underlying structure, restructuring of problem situation to find solution; gain new knowledge (2) barriers to problem solving - mental set - functional fixedness
2.
d. strengths/weaknesses
√ interesting, novel views √ some ideas still used x no mechanisms x only artificial problems x disregard intuitive problem solving
- PROBLEM SPACE HYPOTHESIS
a. main hypothesis
- problem situation (initial, goal, intermediate states, mental operations) is represented in problem space
- humans have limited processing capacity (use heuristics)
3.
b. prior history
- Newell & Simon
- information processing approach = human mind works like a computer
- general problem solver: computer program to solve problems
3.
c. concepts
heuristics
(1) hill climbing: do everything that gets you closer to solution; step-by-step
- works for ill-defined:
(2) means-end-analysis: more elaborate; creating a sub-goal to reduce the difference between the current & goal state
- works for well-defined: need to know structure to set subgoal first
(3) progress monitoring: 1. monitor/check progress 2. if process too slow: change of strategy
3.
d. strengths/weaknesses
√ detailed explanations
√ many applications
x cannot explain insight problem-solving
x everyday problems are not well-defined