Task 1 Flashcards

1
Q

What are the different levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs?

A
Level 1: Physiological needs
Level 2: Safety-security needs
Level 3: Belongingness needs
Level 4: Esteem needs
Level 5: Self-actualization needs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do the different needs in Maslow’s hierarchy model relate to each other and what do they steer?

A

different needs/levels are mutually/hierarchical ordered & steer motivation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How exactly is a need in Maslow’s model defined?

A

a lack of something that is essential to an organism’s (a person’s) existence or well-being –> not the thing itself but the LACK thereof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What makes it possible to satisfy the next higher-level need in Maslow’s model?

A

Satisfaction of any lower-level need

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How were the needs correlated with the ones immediately below them in Taormina’s study?
–> Does it support Maslow’s model?

A

-satisfaction of any given need was positively & significantly correlated with the need immediately below it in the hierarchy–> supports Maslow’s theorized hierarchy of needs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which of Maslow’s needs was a significant predictor of the satisfaction of all the other needs?

A

satisfaction of the physiological needs –> suggest that the physiological needs are profound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the core concept/assumption of the cognitive-attribution theories of emotion & motivation?

A

-Cause–emotion relations are at the heart of the theory

==> feelings are determined by thoughts & specifically by beliefs about causality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 3 causal properties of attribution theories?

A
  • causal locus –> causes perceived as residing with or outside of the person
  • causal stability –> causes that are stable & remain in place e.g. unattractiveness
  • casual control –> some overlap with both locus and stability –> two causes of achievement failure—lack of effort (under personal control) versus lack of aptitude (uncontrollable)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the pleasure/pain principle that lays at the very center of motivation theory? (historically old)

A

organisms attempt to maximize pleasure & minimize pain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the theory of achievement motivation (Atkinson) about?

  • -> How were rewards first considered?
  • -> How did Atkinson’s theory consider rewards?
A

rewards were considered extrinsic motivations, not intrinsically or inherently tied to achievement striving

–>Atkinson: incentive value or reward for achievement behavior is not a material good but instead an affect ==> pride in accomplishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which other emotional responses were determined/ described supporting the core assumption of the attribution model after Atkinson’s theory of achievement motivation?

A
  • success-linked emotions: happiness, pride, envy & admiration, liking & disliking, gratitude, surprise, confidence & apprehension
  • failure-linked emotions: unhappiness, shame & guilt, sympathy & scorn, anger, helplessness & hopelessness & hope, schadenfreude
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is meant by ‘emotions have to obey certain laws’?

A

laws of emotion are grounded in mechanisms that are not of voluntary nature & that are only partly under voluntary control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What different laws are there?

A
  • regulation: law of situational meaning, law of concern, law of apparent reality, laws of change, habituation and comparative feeling, Law of hedonic asymmetry
  • elicitation: Law of conservation of emotional momentum, Law of closure, The law of care for consequences, Laws of lightest load and greatest gain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Is there a differentiation in the way certain laws might act on particular aspects of emotions (e.g. initiation, durability) ?

A

laws of regulation vs elicitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Do emotions necessarily reflect conscious subjective feelings?

A

Emotions can occur consciously but also unconsciously & are shared with animals

  • -> supported by a great amount of evidence
  • -> double proof: to reject the objection that we do not have proof of feelings of others (stated above), we also do not have proof about the subjective feelings we experience & of a lot of other things we accept as being true
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Do we share emotions with animals?

A

yes, basic emotions needed for survival (fear,anger, happiness, sadness) & not complex emotions (pride, shame)

  • -> LeDoux: said no because they cannot articulate the, but it’s most likely wrong
  • -> we cannot exclude that they don’t have emotions, but we can never prove it (Popper: we can only falsify)
17
Q

How/why does the incentive-salience perspective on emotion/motivation excels the drive-reduction perspectives?

A

-Motivation is directed toward affectively positive incentives & the brain motivation systems modulate those incentive values, increasing wanting & liking

–> drive theory was proved wrong as they found that cues for incentive stimulus evoke motivation in a state, whereas cues for drive state do not

–> brain electrode stimulation: electrodes were not only rewarding (people worked to activate them) but were also motivating

–> drive theory: to reduce unpleasant state (drink to not be thirsty; drive reduction; negative reinforcement & not positive pleasure)

–> incentive salience: motivation directed towards positive drives (we’re thirsty –> we enjoy drinking water); we want to gain smth pleasurable

=> dogs kept eating even tho not hungry anymore (bc of appetite, not just to be satuated)

18
Q

subjective feelings vs objective features of emotion

A
  • objective features: physiological arousals
  • subjective feelings: everything consciously perceived

–> example: inducing panic attack bc of focusing on physiological arousal & attributing it to subjective feelings

19
Q

What are the problems with the assumption that

emotions are necessarily conscious feelings?

A

-can also occur unconsciously

20
Q

Differences in ‘Wanting’ vs ‘Liking’ & involvement in motivation-emotion

A
  • Liking: hedonic impact of pleasant reward (NOT related to dopa, but to opioid endocannabinoids)
  • Wanting: incentive salience is a mesocorticolimbic form of wanting –> DOPA mediates WANTING
21
Q

How do emotions relate to mesocorticolimbic brain areas including DOPA-related systems?

A
  • DOPA: wanting –> energizes & motivates to seek reward
  • -> more stable & that’s why we often have intense wanting, but not intense liking

–> areas w/ liking: more fragile, why we have less intense liking; limbic structures, PFC, brainstem & nucleus accumbens –> act together in network ==> if stimulated, exponential liking (e.g. orgasm)

  • D1: positive, wanting
  • D2: negative, fear

–> limbic system that are related to DOPA e.g. striatum, nucleus accumbens

22
Q

Assumption of attribution theory

A

feelings are determined by thoughts, and specifically by beliefs about causality

23
Q

laws of emotion –> examples

A

x