Takings Clause Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what is the takings rule

A

the gov’t may only take your property for public use and provide you with just compensation when it does

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

source of law

A

5th Am takings clause (applied to states via 14th Am)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

covered property

A

personal property, real property, certain intangibles like interest on attorney trust accounts and trade secrets

not welfare benefits

taking away of right to possess, use, or exclude

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

big picture takings inquiry

A

is there a taking or merely a regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

a taking will be found if there is:

A

PHYSICAL TAKING
(1) confiscation of person’s property
OR
(2) permanent or regular physical occupation of a person’s property by the government

TEMPORARY OCCUPATION as physical taking
– case by case analysis

regulatory taking - regulation amounts to a taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

factors for determining whether a temporary occupation is a physical taking

A

degree of invasion, the duration, the government’s intention, the foreseeability of the result, the character of the property, and the interference with the use of the property

considering all these things –

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

exceptions to physical takings – i.e. government takes property but it is not a “takings”

A

(1) development exception

(2) public emergency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the development exception to physical takings

A

Municipalities often attempt to condition building or develop- ment permits on a landowner’s
(1) conveying title to part of the property to the government (for example, to be used as streets),
or
(2) granting the public an easement to access the property (such as easements for water or electricity)

These are takings UNLESS:

(1) the government can show there is an essential nexus between the condition and the proposed development (that is, the condition relates to a legitimate government interest)

and

(2) the adverse impact of the proposed development is roughly proportional to the loss caused to the property owner from the forced transfer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the emergency exception to takings

A

A taking is less likely to be found, even for a complete and permanent deprivation, if it’s made pursuant to a public emergency, such as war.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is a regulatory taking?

A

use restriction occasioned by a regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

to what extent do regulations constitute regulatory takings?

A

regulations that deny all economic value of land/economically viable use of land = taking unless principles of nuisance or property law make the use prohibitable.

regulations that temporarily deny economic use = not a per se taking, depends on circumstances

regulations that decrease value of property = subject to balancing test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

example of regulation that denies all economic value of land

A

a regulation that prohibits building on the land

this is a taking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

to what extent is a regulation that temporarily denies economic use a taking

A

Court will carefully examine and weigh all the relevant circumstances to determine whether “fairness and justice” require just compensation

the planners’ good faith
the reasonable expectations of the owners
length of delay
delay’s actual effect on value of property
etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

to what extent do regulations that decrease economic value constitute takings

A

Generally, regulations that merely decrease the value of property (for example, prohibiting the most beneficial use) do not amount to a taking if they leave an economically viable use for the property.

The Court will consider
(1) the government interests sought to
be promoted;
(2) the diminution in value to the owner; AND
(3) whether the regulation substantially interferes with distinct, invest- ment-backed expectations of the owner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Condemnation of land to build highway - taking?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Creating public access easement on private property - taking?

A

yes

17
Q

Abolishing inheritance rights - takings?

A

yes

18
Q

Zoning ordinances that merely prohibit the most beneficial use of property - takings?

A

no - regulation

19
Q

Ordering destruction of diseased trees - taking?

A

no - regulation

20
Q

Landmark ordinances generally - taking?

A

no - regulation

21
Q

A moratorium prohibits development on property for 32 months pending the completion of a comprehensive land-use plan. Is there a taking?

A

no
public interest high

22
Q

what is “public use?”

A

If the government’s action is rationally related to a legitimate public purpose (for example, for health, welfare, safety, economic, or aesthetic reasons), the public use requirement is satisfied.

works to the public advantage

very broad

23
Q

what is just compensation

A

Just compensation is measured by the fair market value of the property taken at the time of the taking, and it’s based on the loss to the owner.

increases in value to owner’s remaining property as a result of the taking is not considered

24
Q

what is eminent domain

A

taking property for public use – same as a taking!

as in, “gov’t exercises power of eminent domain to take private property for public use”

25
Q

inverse condemnation

A

Inverse condemnation is a term used in the law to describe a situation in which the government takes private property but fails to pay the compensation required by the 5th Amendment of the Constitution, so the property’s owner has to sue to obtain the required just compensation.

If the court determines that the government action amounted to a taking, the government will be required to either:

Pay the property owner just compensation for the property,
or
Terminate the regulation and pay the owner for damages that occurred while the regulation was in effect (that is, temporary taking damages).