federalism Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

10th amendment

A

powers not granted to federal government are reserved to state or people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

can state exercise general police powers?

A

yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

standard for evaluating state general police power?

A

as long as there is a rational basis for serving health, safety, welfare, it is valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

anti commandeering principle

A

congress cannot compel states to enact state legislation, to NOT enact certain legislation (like legalizing gambling) or administer federal programs

state/local employees cannot be compelled to run criminal background checks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

non-coercive use of spending power is not

A

comandeering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is non coercive spending power by congress

A

incentivize local officials to voluntary assist in administering federal laws by giving them federal $

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

supremacy clause

A

federal law is supreme = preempts inconsistent state and local law

federal law wins if there is conflict with state law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

types of preemption

A

express preemption – congress says fed law wins

implied preemption – fed law does not expressly claim to be only permissible source of regulation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Types of implied preemption

A

conflict between fed and state law

state law impedes or frustrates federal law, even if no direct conflict

field preemption – congress bars state/local law in the entire field [congress extensively regulates such that it manifests intent for states to stay out]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Basic idea of state privileges and immunities clause of article 4

A

prohibits states from discriminating against out of state citizens with respect to

important commercial activities - ability to earn a living

and

fundamental rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

who has privileges and immunities in article 4

A

only US citizens

not corporations or aliens

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

to what extent can states discriminate against out of state citizens despite PI clause of article 4?

A

they can discriminate if there is an important state interest

the law is necessary to achieve an important government purpose and there are no less restrictive means available.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what does the 14th amendment PI clause say?

A

states may not deny their citizens the P or I of national citizenship

not corporations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are privileges of national citizenship?

A

right to petition congress for redress of grievances

right to interstate travel

right to demand fed protection on high seas from pirates

right to vote for federal officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

state power to regulate interstate commerce is limited by:

A

a superseding federal law regulating interstate commerce

dormant commerce clause rules against discrimination and burdening interstate commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what does the dormant commerce clause allow and disallow state to do?

A

A state or local government may regulate local aspects of interstate commerce IF Congress has not enacted laws regarding the subject

BUT the state or local government must not discriminate against or unduly burden interstate commerce.

17
Q

discriminatory laws (that discriminate against other states) may violate what:

A

dormant CC

Article IV PI clause

18
Q

to what extent can state pass discriminatory regulations on interstate commerce?

A

discriminatory state laws are presumptively invalid

State can overcome this burden if it shows

(1) law is necessary to achieve important purpose unrelated to protectionism

and

(2) there are no reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives available.

19
Q

what does it mean to discriminate in the context of the dormant commerce clause and state regulation of commerce?

A

regulations that protect local economic interests by imposing different requirements on other states

20
Q

to what extent can state pass NONdiscriminatory regulations on interstate commerce?

A

presumptively valid

nondiscriminatory law that BURDENS interstate commerce is also presumptively valid, BUT will be invalid if the burden placed on commerce outweighs any legitimate local interest

The court will consider whether less restrictive alternatives are available.

21
Q

exceptions to rule that dormant commerce clause prohibits discriminatory state regulations and burdens?

A

(1) congressional approval
congress may allow states to discriminate against or burden interstate commerce

(2) market participant
dormant commerce clause does not apply when state acts as buyer or seller of goods or services
(states can sell construction contracts, higher education, etc.)

(3) a regulation favoring local governments when performing traditional government functions is permissible

22
Q

how to approach questions that involve state regulation of commerce

A

Does the question refer to any federal legislation that might:
* Supersede the state regulation or preempt the field?
* Authorize state regulation otherwise impermissible?
If neither of these possibilities is dispositive, does the state regulation either discriminate against interstate or out-of-state commerce or place an undue burden on the free flow of interstate commerce?
* *
* *
If the regulation is discriminatory, it will be invalid unless:

It furthers an important, noneconomic state interest and there are no reasonable nondiscriminatory alternatives OR
The state is a market participant
If the regulation does not discriminate but burdens interstate com- merce, it will be invalid if the burden on commerce outweighs the state’s interest.

23
Q

how courts look at states passing nondiscriminatory laws impacting interstate interstate commerce when laws deal with corporations

A

A different standard may apply to statutes adopted by the state of incorporation regulating the internal governance of a corpora- tion. Because of the states’ long history of regulating the internal governance of corporations that they create, and because of their strong interest in doing so, even a statute that heavily impacts interstate commerce may be upheld (for example, a state may deny voting rights to persons who acquire a controlling interest
in a state corporation without approval from other shareholders, despite the impact that this may have on interstate commerce).

24
Q

examples of valid and invalid discrimination under PI clause of Article 4

A

Invalid Discrimination:
1. Statute requiring $2,500 license fee from nonresident commercial fishermen, while residents paid $25.
2. Statute giving resident creditors priority over nonresident creditors to assets of foreign corporations in receivership proceedings.
3. Rule limiting bar admission to state residents.
4. Statute requiring private sector employers to give hiring preference to residents.

Discrimination Upheld:
Statute requiring nonresidents to pay $225 license fee, as opposed to $30 residents’ fee, for recreational hunting.

25
Q

to what extent can federal government tax states and private entities

A

(1) Tax or Regulation Applying to Both State and Private Entities—Valid [ex: min wage laws]

(2) Tax or Regulation Applying Only to States—Typically Invalid [anti-commandeering]

26
Q

what has been found invalid under the anti-commandeering principle?

A

The following acts were found to be invalid under this anti-comman- deering principle:

1) Requiring states to enact environmental regulations

2) Requiring local law enforcement to conduct background checks for a federal handgun law

3) Banning states from legalizing sports gambling

27
Q

when can states tax federal government? / intergovernmental immunity

A

intergovernmental immunity doctrine = Based on the Supremacy Clause, states cannot interfere with or control the operations of the federal government

(1) states can’t regulate the federal government or its agents while performing their federal functions (for example, a state can’t require a member of the armed forces to have a driver’s license to drive military equipment in the state).

(2) States cannot directly tax federal instrumentalities without the consent of Congress.

what states CAN do:
States can enact nondiscriminatory, indirect taxes IF they do not unreasonably burden the federal government

28
Q

what is the market participant exception?

A

A state or local government may prefer its own citizens in receiving benefits from government programs or in dealing with government-owned businesses (for example, when hiring labor, buying or selling products, or giving subsidies). However, once a state sells state-owned resources, it cannot control what happens to the resource after that. Thus, Alaska violated the Commerce Clause when it imposed a contractual require- ment on purchasers of state-owned timber that the timber be processed in Alaska before being shipped out of state.

29
Q

state taxes will be valid under the dormant commerce clause if:

A

(1) it does not discriminate against interstate commerce

(2) there is a substantial nexus between the activity taxed and taxing state

(3) tax is fairly apportioned

and

(4) tax fairly relates to services or benefits provided by the statute

30
Q

import-export clause

A

applies to authority of a state to tax foreign commerce