sustainable development - low priority Flashcards

1
Q

stock pollutant

A

a pollutant that has long-term consequences – e.g. CO2 in the atmosphere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

flow pollutants

A

pollutants that do their damage relatively quickly and are then either diluted to harmless levels or transformed into harmless substances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How do people modify the environment

A

through the use of natural resources and the exhaustion of environmental sinks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

renewable vs non-renewable

A

As long as the rate of extraction of renewablere source stocks is balanced by regeneration, resource use will not reduce future availability. However, any use of nonrenewable resources reduces their stock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Common definition of sustainability

A

“development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Weak Sustainability

A

o Requires that the overall capital stock needed to support a high quality of life —including manufactured, human, social, and natural capital—is maintained
o In other words, weak sustainability can be achieved even with the loss of natural capital as long as other forms of capital are adequate substitutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strong Sustainability

A

o Requires maintaining the total stock of each form of capital separately (natural, manufactured, human, and social)
o Focuses on measuring natural capital

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Neoclassical economists

A

o Neoclassical economists view natural and other forms of capital generally as substitutes in production
o View nature as highly resilient
o Globalisation, if it promotes development, can also lead to a sustainable future
o Sustainability is achieved through a well-functioning and properly regulated market system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Ecological economists

A

o Ecological economists argue that other forms of capital cannot generally be used to substitute for natural capital
o The global ecosystems in which our economy is embedded are fragile
o Tend to be technological pessimists
o See the need for an expanded role for government inaggressively protecting our dwindling stock of naturalcapital.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Implementing weak sustainability

A

o Weak sustainability assumes that it is generallypossible to substitute human-made for naturalcapital. But natural capital produces goods and services over long periods of time
o How do we value the services of natural capital(eg climate regulation, fresh water filtering, biodiversity preservation) far into the future?
o The answer: use benefit-cost analysis to assess if it is more efficient to protect or to use up the natural capital today.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

posting an environmental bond

A

Putting money aside into a bank account specifically to compensate future generations for pollution damages or depletion of natural capital

The potential for posting an environmental bond offers us a rationale for spending less on prevention today than the full value of the damage we inflict on future generations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

discounted future benefits

A

When future costs and benefits are not weighted as heavily as current benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

present discounted value

A

PDV = $X/(1+r)^T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What determines an interest rate or market discount rate?

A

Supply & Demand in the market for “loanable funds”

The supply of loanable funds is determined by bank deposits—money in individual and business savings accounts that, in turn, form the basis for loans by banks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is the real interest rate on savings so low, typically 5% or less?

A

A positive rate of time preference:the well-known desire to consume more today, regardless ofthe consequences for tomorrow.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

demand curve for loanable funds

A

reflects the opportunities for productive investment projects in the economy

17
Q

what do quantity of loans supplied and demanded depend on

A

Both the quantity of loans supplied and demanded depend on the interest rate: Higher rates lead to a desire for more savings, and less desire for borrowing.

At the same time, reductions in the overall supply of loanable funds, or an increase in demand, will raise market rates and lead to greater discounting of the future.

18
Q

Ramsey equation

A

r = d + ng

d = rate of time preference
g = growth rate of the economy
n = elasticity of marginal utility of consumption

19
Q

Weak Sustainability and the Discount Rate

A

o The emphasis of weak sustainability is discounted consumption possibilities.
o Savings – for example in the form of ‘environmental bonds’ facilitate future consumption.
o Erosion of natural capital is permissible as long as future (discounted) consumption is still enabled.
o Note though that ‘weak sustainability’ can imply a strong policy response

20
Q

Strong sustainability - precautionary principle

A

o Precautionary Principle: Never reduce the stock of natural capital below a level that generates a sustained yield of services unless good substitutes are currently available for the services generated. When in doubt, conserve
o To determine the availability of substitutes requires focusing on uniqueness and uncertainty combined with irreversibility

21
Q

Strong Sustainability in Practice

A

o The Endangered Species Act is the only piece of U.S. legislation that requires strong sustainability
o National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), requires a “light” version of the precautionary principle
o Requires and environmental impact statement (EIS) for “legislation or other major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.”
o In the EU, REACH (registration, evaluation, and authorization of chemicals) requires chemical manufacturers to carry out health and environmental safety tests prior to introducing new chemicals

22
Q

How has human well-being improved over the last 200 years?

A

 Fewer famines
 Increased caloric intake
 Reduced child and infant mortality
 Increased life expectancy
 Reductions in time worked
 Increased literacy

23
Q

What did Malthus assume about Ecological Economics

A

 Assumed
1. that the food supply grows arithmetically
2. a healthy population grows geometrically
 Malthus argued, population growth would outstrip the food supply, leading to increasing human misery, famine, disease, or war

24
Q

Challenges for Malthus’s Assumptions

A

 Agricultural output has not grown arithmetically
 From about 1950 through the 1980s, the Green Revolution in agriculture resulted in greatly increased yields for major crops around the world

 Population does not always increase geometrically
 Excluding immigration, high income countries have very low population growth rates—often below zero.

 Other resource constraints than just arable land
 Agriculture requires massive quantities of freshwater, energy, fertilisers, and pesticides
 Just because food production has increased faster than population in the past is no guarantee that it will continue to do so in the future
 Rising affluence has resulted in a massive increase in the demand for meat, which is resource intensive

25
Q

Ecosystem services

A

the benefits that people receive from nature

26
Q

How can the majority of ecosystem services be declining at the same time as there are big gains in human well-being?

A
  1. It may be that the really important services, like food production, are increasing and this more than makes up for declines in other services
  2. Technological advances have made well-being less dependent on natural capital
  3. There may be time lags between declines in natural capital and declines in standards of living.
27
Q

Measuring strong sustainability - Ecological footprint

A

 The ecological footprint of a community (or nation) calculates how much land and water area is needed to provide the resources for production and for assimilation of wastes for that community
 ecological footprint calculations indicate that we currently need about 1.5 earths to accommodate all the demands over time

28
Q

Measuring strong sustainability - Human development index

A

 The Human Development Index (HDI)includes measures of per capita income, education levels, and life expectancy
 Varies between 0 and 1
 Norway has the highest score (0.94)
 The Democratic Republic of Congo has the lowest score (0.29)

29
Q

Measuring strong sustainability - impacts

A

IPAT equation:
Environmental Impact = Population X Affluence X Technology

30
Q

Measuring weak sustainability - Net National Welfare

A

Net National Welfare (NNW), attempts to measure, on an annual basis, the “real” well-being of society’s members

In principle, NNW can be defined as the total annual output of both market and nonmarket goods and services minus the total externality and cleanup costs associated with these products, minus the depreciation of capital, both natural and human-made, used up in production

NNW = Total Output - Costs of Growth - Depreciation

31
Q

Failures of GDP as a measure of sustainability

A
  1. fails to include the value of nonmarket goods and services
  2. includes costs incurred in reducing harmful activities
  3. fails to account for the depreciation of the capital used up in production, especially natural capital
  4. reflects the experience of the “average person” but does not account for distribution or equity concerns
32
Q

Measuring weak sustainability - Inclusive Wealth

A

 IW is defined as the value of all capital stocks including human capital, manufactured capital, natural capital, and social capital
 The idea behind IW is that if we leave future generations with greater overall wealth, then they will have the means to be better off. However, if we deplete wealth, future generations will be unable to match current standards of living.

33
Q

Depreciation Rule for natural capital

A

depreciation equals the measured value of the resource rent

34
Q

resource rent

A

what future generations arelosing by our exploitation of natural capital

35
Q

Are We Achieving Sustainability?

A

 Several studies show that NNW and GDP are not correlated, which means that popular perception of GDP as a measure of economic welfare may well be misguided.
 The evidence to date seems to indicate that NNW and IW are growing in most countries but that each is growing more slowly than growth in GDP
 Whether this evidence is really proof of achieving sustainability, however, is questionable.

36
Q

Market actors use high rates

A

 Decision makers in the private sector often have shorter time horizons than do government agencies: Companies and consumers often discount at 15-20%, meaning they will only invest in projects that pay back in5-7 years.
 High market discount rates explain why many of our decisions today might be unsustainable. Due to high discount rates, we fail to make many long-lived investments that could benefit our descendants

37
Q

Why are required profit rates so high, when there are many long term investments for the future that can’t be funded at these rates?

A

 high required returns reflect only the private benefits of investment and fail to account for the external costs to society as a whole of growth
 some of these profits are coming from resource rents, and do not reflect any depreciation of natural capital
 high returns are required to induce people to save and invest their income

38
Q

The Ecological-Neoclassical Debate in Context

A

 In advocating for strict standards, both safety proponents and ecological economists make utilitarian arguments: Environmental protection is good for people because the society-wide opportunity cost of protection is relatively low
 Efficiency advocates and neoclassical economists respond that the safety and ecological positions are too extreme. They insist there are trade-offs and that we can pay too much for a pristine environment.