Surveys and Monitoring Flashcards
Methods involved
- Territory mapping
- Mark and recapture/re-sighting
- Transects and point counts
- Botanical surveys
Territory mapping
Multiple visits - record locations and activity of all sightings (movement etc.)
Can overlap on maps and define specific clusters - i.e. territories
Time sensitive - needs lots o repeats
No good for colonial species; poly-territorial spp or territories that can’t be detected
Mark and recapture/re-sighting
Estimate pop size from % marked individuals recaptured/resighted in a subsequent sample - need unique marks
Labour intensive but best for elusive spp
Can use camera traps if nocturnal - need big animals to set it off though
Pit fall traps for reptiles, small mammals etc.
Mark and recapture assumptions
- No movement of populations between 2 periods
- Requires closed population (no immigration or emigration)
- Influenced by mortality and recruitment (birth)
Method for open population - Jolly-Jeber method instead assumes… - Marks last in sampling period
- Capture probabilities are constant across individuals ‘trap-happy’ = more likely to be captured
- Emigration loses have to be permanent
Types of marks
Natural - on cetaceans injury scars are unique, similar to spot patterns on cheetahs
Artificial - fur/toe clipping - will last a few months
Permanent marks - pit tags under skin will be individual and good in long-term studies
Transects and point counts
Count all individuals in an area Transects move along Point - certain place for certain time Point counts preferred when - habitats are fragmented, or difficulties moving on route etc. Otherwise - transects better.
Transect and point assumptions
- Precise detection and all individuals will be detected
- Individuals don’t move before detection, no double counts
- Individuals detected independently and distances measured accurately
Using transect and point data
If looking at population trends you can just use the counts
-not useful for comparisons across species and habitats
-not useful for population size either
Have to apply distance sampling - detectability declines with distances from transects and it varies with species (elusive or not) and habitats (dense)
-allows detection of individuals not found, can calculate density
Botanical survey
None previously mentioned are really relevant to plants - this one is
Use distance sampling still - size needs to be considered (cacti etc.)
Quadrats are common - optimum size trade-off with time taken and sample size
Difficult to determine what is 1 individual (multiple stems), so often use % cover