Enforcing the rules of marine issues Flashcards
Methods
Artificially limits fish being caught
- Catch-control
- Individual quotas
- Catch quota
- Effort control
- Technical measures
Catch-control
Limits total allowable catches - biologically good and based on sound evidence
Economically poor idea, as fishermen race to max their share of the limits
Individual quotas
Limiting individual boats - all adds up the catch control limit
• Their quotas can be traded for more of something and less of another
• Fishermen have ‘property rights’
• Difficult at first because everyone wants
• Can increase by bycatch and discards
Catch quota
Overcomes discards and bycatch problems of previous
• Counted what they caught and not what landed - discards from 30-40% to 0.2%
• But a complete ban could be harmful for wider wildlife that now rely on this, like seabirds and mammals etc.
-consequences unless done carefully
Effort control
Limits boats, fishers, gear they use and the power etc.
• To reduce catch power
• Less effective than catch control
Technical measures
- Restrict size/sex and facilitate gear changes towards this
- Increase mesh size (smaller can get away)
- Restrict times and areas available to avoid breeding areas
Problems with enforcing the rules…
- All species specific, and fishing effects entire ecosystems
- Data hungry techniques - can be difficult to obtain
- Enforcing can be difficult
Example
Common fisheries policy - Eu since 1970s
• Eu fish is a common resource
• Quotas at national level
• Problem with this historically has been ineffective in stopping declines (last 10yrs good though)
• Politicians can ignore scientists advice (Rays - Vendables)
• Quotas of Eu is 20% higher than it should be
• Fishing mortality often increases, even though stocks are declining
-Eu Hake - recommended catch is at 0 - but they allow 10,000tonnes - landings massively exceeding this
Naive model
Fishers -> Data -> Scientists -> Managers -> ‘effective management’
How it actually works…
• Fisheries are multi-species
• Conflicting goals and multiple stakeholders
• No optimal solution
Objectives of management from different fields
Biological - protect habitat and rebuild stocks
Economic - maximise income, keep prices low
Social - max protein supply and employment
Political - raise government revenue, reduce conflicts
Management approaches
Top-down enforcement (like common fisheries policy) - groups together and sorts plan
Community-driven management ‘bottom-up’, works for small scales
E.g. territorial user rights for Fisheries established for artisanal fishers in Chile
-fishers exploit and police own area
-this increased targeted benthic species and reef fishes
-solving people problems with positive biodiversity effects