Surgery Flashcards
Nerve injury at hysterectomy
Pfannenstiel incision
- can transect the iliohypogastric or ilioinguinal nerves
- 7% will experience symptoms - most will resolve after 6/12
- can cause neuroma - need to either reimplant the nerve or remove scar tissue
Retraction at hysterectomy can damage the:
- Femoral nerve as it emerges from the psoas muscle
- Genitofemoral nerve (lies of the belly of the psoas muscle, sensory perineum and upper thigh)
- Lateral cutaneous nerve (lies on the belly of the posts muscle, numbness and pain radiate down thigh towards knee)
Nerves that can become entrapped in reconstructive pelvic surgery
Sacrospinous fixation
- pudendal nerve when sutures placed in the arcus tendinus
uterosacral ligament suspension
- S1-4
Lithotomy nerve injuries
Common perineal nerve
How electricity is utilised in electrosurgery
Alternating current from wall outlets has a frequency of around 50 - 60 hertz
Low frequency currents have a stimulating effect on nerve and muscle cells
With high frequency alternating currents (>200 kHz) - doesn’t stimulate –> insensitivity to the stimulus develops
- Therefore, all electrosurgical instruments in the operating theatre must operate at a base frequency of greater than 300 kHz
Describe cutting waveform
Wave shape is a simple continuous sinusoidal form
Low voltage
Produces heat rapidly therefore vaporising or cutting the tissue
Describe coagulation waveform
Modulated current - the sinusoidal waveform is non-continuous
6%:94% modulated waveform
Pulses of current flow alternate with periods of no-flow –> heating effect
High voltage
Result in a deeper heating and thus a greater coagulation effect - intracellular water is removed and remaining proteins become sticky as the heat produces a collagen chain reaction
What is monopolar
Small active electrode produces heat at operative site in surgeon’s hand –> high current density and tissue effects occur through heating
Return electrode has a larger area, therefore very low current density so very little tissue heating
The smaller the electrode the higher the current concentration and greater the effect regardless of power setting
Electricity returns to generator by passing through patient then dispersed by return electrode on patient’s skin
Place on a well vascularised muscle mass avoiding areas of vascular insufficiency, irregular body contours or bony prominences
Monopolar - pros and cons
Advantages:
- Can be used on a small area / tissue
- Same electrode for cutting and coagulating
- Relatively inexpensive
- Readily available
- New isolated systems - current division cannot occur and there is no possibility of alternative site burns
Disadvantages:
- Can interfere with pacemaker function
- Energy preferentially dissipates via vascular pathways, therefore even if small serosal burn evident, may be much larger area of underlying devascularisation
- Arcing can occur with metal instruments
- Superficial burns if used for cutting with spirit based skin preparation
- Diathermy burns under indifferent return pad if improperly applied
what is bipolar
Primary (active) and return (passive) electrodes are the two blades
Electrically insulated from each other
Current passes between the two electrodes and produces a relatively localised area of heating of tissue between the blades
Clinical effect usually only of coagulation
No electrode pad required
Bipolar - pros and cons
Advantages:
- less spread of current
- Greater accuracy
- Greater safety
- Less tissue damage
- Relatively inexpensive
- Readily available
Disadvantages:
- Can interfere with pacemaker function
- Arching can occur with metal instruments
- Heated tissue can come into contact with other tissue, e.g. bowel, and inflict thermal damage
- Low power so not useful for cutting
Desiccation
At higher temp, both dehydration and protein denaturation occur –> desiccation
Tissue that is completely desiccated has very high resistance and does not conduct electrical current
Cut or coag
Contact
Vaporization
High heat vaporises tissue immediately adjacent to the tip of the electrode
Since the cells “explode”, no char is produced
Cut
Non-contact
Fulguration
Electrode held a bit further away that with vaporisation
Electrical current jumps or arcs between the tip and the nearby tissue –> char
Used to control bleeding over a wide area
- Useful to control diffuse bleeding over
Coag
Non-contact
Injuries from electrosurgery
Alternative site burn - Current finds an alternate way out of the body. If exit point is small enough, current is concentrated –> burn
Pad site burns - If contact is poor and the surface area of the pad is small enough
Direct coupling - Contact between active electrode and another conducting instrument, e.g. metal instrument. If tissue not firmly attached to body anymore, then don’t use diathermy on it
Capacitative coupling - Occurs when electric current is transferred from one conductor (active electrode) through intact insulation into adjacent conductive materials with direct contact
Insulation failure - Rate is higher in reusable instruments. s
Direct thermal spread
Smoke plume - Contains potentially toxic substances, can also transmit viruses
Current diversion - electrical energy finds the path of least resistance in monopolar energy
- As tissue is further diathermised, it becomes desiccated and its impedence increases
- If diathermy continues, power may flow preferentially to adjacent non-desiccated tissue by arcing
Thermal spread between devices
Harmonic scalpel 0-3mm
10mm Ligasure 1.8mm
5mm Ligasure 4.5mm
Traditional bipolar 2-22mm
Monopolar 50mm
Advanced bipolar devices
Use radiofrequency bipolar energy with an impedence-based feedback loop that modifies the bipolar energy delivered
- Fuses collagen and elastin within the vessel walls
A mechanical blade is needed to cut the tissue after coagulation
Thermal spread to adjacent tissues is approx 2mm
Advanced bipolar devices
- Ligasure
Pros and cons
ADVANTAGES
Excellent haemostasis is achieved, sealing vessels up to 7 mm
Reduced risk of tissue charring and tissue adherence - reduced risk of lateral thermal damage
Audio signal to alert endpoint reached
Tips of instruments remain relatively cool
Tissue spread of 2-3mm
Use lower temperatures (70-95)
DISADVANTAGES Expensive Bulky jaws, inferior dissector Smoke produced which can obscure view Single use
Ultrasonic devices
Convert electrical energy into ultra high frequency mechanical energy (oscillating blade)
Harmonic scalpel
- The vibrating blade oscillates longitudinally at 55,000 vibrations per second
- Heat generated through friction causes protein denaturation and coagulum formation providing haemostasis whilst simultaneously cutting through vaporisation and cavitation
- Inactive upper arm holds tissue in apposition
Ultrasonic dissection does not generate temperatures above 80 degrees, minimising the distance of thermal spread
PRos and cons of Harmonic
Advantages
- These instruments are great dissectors, quick cutters
- Very precise control of cutting and haemostasis without producing smoke or charring
- Less lateral thermal spread
Disadvantages
- Cost
- Limited lifespan of the ultrasound tip, therefore disposable
- More limited coagulation, slower coagulation
- Seals vessels up to 5mm
- May retain heat in the blade after activation, therefore don’t use as a grasper
Hybrid devices
E.g. Thunderbeat
Integrates both ultrasonically generated frictional heat energy and advanced bipolar energy in one instrument
- Ultrasonic tech rapidly cuts and precisely dissects tissue
- Advanced bipolar tech provides reliable vessel sealing
Can seal and cut vessels up to 7mm
Disadvantages
- Expensive
- Lack of good quality evidence on safety efficacy
Surgical strategies to prevent adhesions
Reduce tissue handling
Diligent haemostasis
Reduce drying of tissue
Frequent irrigation or only use wet packs
Limit use of sutures
Avoid foreign bodies
Use starch and latex free gloves at laparotomy
Adhesion prevention at laparoscopy
Barrier agents
- Cochrane review - No evidence for barrier agents (gels, hydroflotation) for reducing pain or infertility (reduce adhesions)
Ringer-lactate saline or icodextrin (Adept) solution
- Separate pelvic structures during early stages of healing.
- Mixed results: some evidence that reduces recurrent adhesion formation but no good evidence to show prevention of primary adhesions
No evidence of support corticosteroid use
- May impair healing
Cochrane 2015 - surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease
VH appears to be superior to LH and AH - a/w faster return to normal activities
If VH not possible, LH has some advantages over AH - more rapid recovery, fewer febrile episodes, fewer wound or abdominal wall infections
- However longer operating time
LH no benefits over VH - longer operating time, TLH had more urinary tract injuries
No evidence that robotic-assisted hysterectomy is of benefit
Removal of the tubes at hysterectomy
consider after discussion with patient
Growing evidence that high-grade serous tumours of ovary and peritoneal surface epithelium originate in the fallopian tubes
Removal does not appear to increase surgical complications or impact ovarian function
No population based data to quantify the risk-benefit profile
Evidence around removal of ovaries for benign disease
Postmenopausal ovaries are physiologically active, continue to produce oestradiol (at low levels) and testosterone
Modelling study, 2005 - “women <65y clearly benefit from ovarian conservation, and at no age is there a clear benefit from prophylactic oophorectomy”
Nurses’ Health Study
- Median f/u 24y
- Bilateral oophorectomy at time of hysterectomy for benign disease a/w:
○ Decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer
○ Increased risk of all-cause mortality, and fatal and non-fatal CHD
- At no age was oophorectomy a/w increased survival
- Oophorectomy not associated with decreased survival in women >55y
Evidence around removal of ovaries for benign disease
Postmenopausal ovaries are physiologically active, continue to produce oestradiol (at low levels) and testosterone
Modelling study, 2005 - “women <65y clearly benefit from ovarian conservation, and at no age is there a clear benefit from prophylactic oophorectomy”
Nurses’ Health Study
- Median f/u 24y
- Bilateral oophorectomy at time of hysterectomy for benign disease a/w:
○ Decreased risk of breast and ovarian cancer
○ Increased risk of all-cause mortality, and fatal and non-fatal CHD
- At no age was oophorectomy a/w increased survival
- Oophorectomy not associated with decreased survival in women >55y