Summary Notes 3 Flashcards
What should the auditor’s overall responses to assessed risks be?
- Emphasise to staff the need to maintain professional scepticism
- Assign extra or more experienced staff
- Use the work of experts, internal auditors or other auditors
- Provide more supervision on the audit
- Incorporate more unpredictability into the audit procedures
What should the auditor’s response to overall risk be at the assertion level?
- Nature, extent and timing of audit procedures should be responsive to the assessed risks:
- Nature: type of test
- Extent: Use of sampling/how much testing
- Timing - during the year, at the year-end or after year-end
-Consider risks from climate change
What should you do if you wish to rely on the work of others?
The auditor of a company has a sole responsibility to form an opinion on the truth and fairness of the financial statements so if they wish to place reliance on the work of others they should carry out the following:
- General assessment of the party upon whom the auditor wishes to place reliance: are they competent and objective?
- Specific assessment of the work upon which the auditor wishes to place reliance: has it been properly planned and performed, and are the conclusions appropriate?
How do you use the work of internal auditors?
- Assess the internal audit function:
- Objectivity
- Competence
- Systematic and disciplined approach - Assess the specific work that may be relied upon:
- Whether work was properly planned, performed, supervised, reviewed and documented
- Whether there is sufficient appropriate audit evidence
- Whether conclusions reached are appropriate - The auditor should test the work of internal audit and conclude on its adequacy for the purposes of external audit
- Are the results of internal audit well received by the company and acted upon?
How do you use an auditor’s expert?
- Assess the expert:
- Competence
- Capability
- Objectivity - Assess the specific work upon which reliance is to be placed:
- Relevance and reasonableness of the expert’s findings, and their consistency with other audit evidence
- Reasonableness of assumptions and methods used
- Relevance, completeness and accuracy of source data used - Evaluate the adequacy of the work as audit evidence
If the auditor discovers that their client has outsourced functions e.g. payroll, what should they do?
- Obtain an understanding of the services outsourced
- Consider access to sources of evidence
- Assess the risks arising
- Review any assurance reports prepared for the service organisation to provide assurance to user clients and their auditors
What are the objectives of an auditor of a parent company when auditing group financial statements?
- Determine whether to act as the auditor of the group financial statements
- If acting as auditor of the group FS:
- Communicate clearly with component auditors
- Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of components and the consolidation process to express an opinion on the group financial statements
How does the parent company auditor achieve their objectives when auditing group financial statements?
- Consider whether the group auditor can obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence e.g. if significant components are audited by other auditors
- Obtain an understanding of the group, its components and their environments
- Obtain an understanding of the component auditor’s independence, competence, regulation
- Set group materiality, which should be higher than component materiality
- Determine the type of work to be performed by the component auditor in response to assessed risks
- Communicate with the component auditor (detailed)
- Evaluate the sufficiency and appropriateness of evidence obtained
- Form an opinion on the parent company and group financial statements
What requirements should the group audit team communicate with the component auditors?
- Work to perform
- Form and content of any communications
- Request confirmation that the component auditor will cooperate with group auditor
- Ethical requirements relevant to the group audit
- Materiality
- Significant risks of misstatement that are relevant to the component audit
- List of related parties
What matters relevant to the group audit should the component auditors communicate?
- Compliance with ethical requirements
- Compliance with group audit team requirements
- Identification of financial information on which the component auditor reports
- Information on non-compliance
- Indicators of management bias
- List of uncorrected misstatements
- Overall findings and opinion
How do you review the financial statements?
- Do the financial statements comply with Companies Act and accounting standards?
- Use a checklist to determine whether disclosures have been properly made - Do the financial statements make sense?
Use analytical procedures:
- Interpretation: review the financial statements considering absolute figures and ratios
- Investigation: Unusual movements or numbers should have been identified as audit risks so the answers to questions should be in the audit working papers
- Corroboration: If answers cannot be found in the working papers then further work is required
How do you evaluate misstatements identified during the audit?
The auditor should accumulate misstatements identified during the audit and:
- Inform management
- Reassess materiality
- Determine whether uncorrected misstatements are material, individually or in aggregate
- Seek written management representations to confirm that the effect of uncorrected misstatement is immaterial
How do you approach opening balances (initial audit engagements)?
The auditor should consider whether there is sufficient evidence to support the opening balances figures and carry out procedures including:
- Agree b/f figures to last year’s financial statements
- Assess accounting policies applied to opening balances
Perform at least one of the following:
- Review previous auditor’s working papers
- Consider whether this year’s audit tests provide evidence over opening balances
- Perform specific procedures on opening balances
If last years FS were not audited, disclose this in the notes
How do you approach comparative information?
- The auditor must obtain sufficient evidence that the comparatives are true and fair
- If there was misstatement in last year’s financial statements and the matter remains unresolved then the auditor should consider the need to modify their opinion in this year’s audit report
What is the going concern basis? What if there are a doubts as to a company’s status as a going concern?
- The going concern basis is used to prepare company financial statements, unless management either intends to liquidate the entity or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so
- If there are doubts over the company’s ability to continue as a going concern, they must be disclosed in the financial statements
What do you do if the company is not a going concern?
The financial statements should be prepared on the break-up/liquidation basis:
- No long-term assets or liabilities
- Assets valued at recoverable amount
- Provisions may be required for new costs e.g. redundancies
At what stages should the auditor consider going conern?
At all stages of the audit:
Planning stage:
- Understand the entity, its operating environment, internal control systems
- Consider business risk identification/assessment process carefully
Evidence stage:
- Make enquiries of management and consider management bias risk
Procedures can include:
- Review future plans including latest interim/management accounts and other relevant forecasts/projections
- Reading minutes of meetings of shareholders and directors
- Review borrowing facilities/finance
Reporting stage: Consider the implications for the audit report
Remember that management should always perform their own assessment of the going concern basis
What is an adjusting event?
- Provide evidence of conditions that existed at the date of the financial statements
- The FS should be adjusted
What is a non-adjusting event?
- Provide evidence of conditions that arose after the date of the financial statements
- The event should be disclosed in the financial statements (but if the non-adjusting event is so significant that it affects the going concern basis of the company then the FS should be restated)
What is the audit response to subsequent events between year end and audit report sign-off?
- Active responsibility to carry out procedures to identify events that require adjustment or disclosure
- Seek written management representations that all subsequent events have been included in the financial statements
What is the audit response to subsequent events after signing off the audit report?
If the auditor becomes aware of subsequent events, ask directors to amend the financial statements
If they do not then act to prevent reliance on the audit report e.g.
- Seek legal advice
- Use right to speak at AGM
- Consider resignation
When should the management representation letter be signed?
The management representation letter should be signed by the directors before the audit report is signed