SF Questions: Concluding and Reporting on Engagements Flashcards
The new auditor of a company has concluded that a material amount in the preceding year’s financial statements was included within an incorrect current asset heading.
The audit opinion was unmodified.
Requirement
Explain the auditor’s responsibilities in relation to the current year’s auditor’s report.
Incorrect classification last year 24.1
Comparatives form part of financial statements •
But no opinion on comparatives as such •
No effect on current year figures •
If comparatives not adjusted, should consider implications for report •
If comparatives adjusted and adequately disclosed, opinion not modified
During the audit of Morgan Ltd audit tests indicated that company policy requiring purchase orders to be placed only by the company’s buying department was not adhered to in 10% of the transactions examined.
Requirement
In respect of the above breach in company policy, draft extracts suitable for inclusion in the auditor’s management letter, which set out the possible consequences and the recommendations that you would make.
Consequences
Duplicate orders •
Use of unauthorised suppliers •
Terms/prices negotiated with unauthorised suppliers generally less favourable •
Purchase of unauthorised non-business goods and services
Goods may not be to appropriate standards or requirements
May result in breach of budgets and loss of control by buying department •
Invoices may not be entered in purchase ledger, resulting in understated liabilities •
Recommendations
All significant purchase orders over pre-determined limit to be placed by buying department except for small orders (say under £1,000)
Employees in breach of company procedures to be informed in writing •
Circulate company policy to all staff, and staff to confirm in writing that they understand company policy
All suppliers to be informed in writing of company policy
Your firm has recently been appointed as auditor to Donner Ltd for the year ending 31 October 20X5. This is the first year of audit for Donner Ltd as it fell below the statutory audit exemption limits for the year ended 31 October 20X4, which was the company’s first period of trading.
Requirement
State the matters to be considered in respect of the opening balances of Donner Ltd
Check opening balances correctly brought forward •
Review client working papers for prior year •
Check appropriateness of accounting policies/accounting policies consistently applied year to year
Any changes appropriately accounted for/disclosed •
Substantive work on opening balances (where no alternative available) •
State in auditor’s report that comparative figures not audited (ISA (UK) 710) •
Ensure disclosure of lack of audit in prior year in financial statements •
Integrity of accounting system/strength of control environment
You have obtained external confirmations of receivables as part of your audit of Charnley Ltd for the year ended 31 October 20X0.
The following disagreements have been revealed:
1. A customer disagreed with the balance because it had sent a cheque on 27 October (20X0.
2 A customer had been promised a credit note against an invoice dated 5 October 20X0 because the wrong price had been charged, but this had not yet been issued.
Requirement
What further information will you require in order to conclude on the results of this test, and why will you require this information?
Further information and why required. 24.4
(1) Disagreement over balance:
Amount of cheque confirms balance outstanding •
Cheque received, banked and posted after year end •
To confirm as acceptable timing difference in conclusion •
(2) Promised credit note:
Provided for at year end = acceptable timing difference
Not provided for = error in conclusion of test •
Whether isolated occurrence or not •
For need to extrapolate or not in conclusion
The directors of two companies, Fletcher Ltd and Dervish Ltd, have each prevented their auditors from carrying out procedures considered necessary to verify the amount of inventories held by third parties of £250,000.
In the audit of Fletcher Ltd materiality has been set at £200,000, and in the audit of Dervish Ltd materiality has been set at £15,000.
Requirement
State the effect this matter will have on the auditor’s report of each company.
Fletcher Ltd
Qualified opinion •
‘Except for’ •
Inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence •
Dervish Ltd
Disclaimer of opinion •
Unable to form opinion on true and fair •
Both
Description of circumstances/amounts
The directors of Denzil Ltd are preparing the financial statements for the year ended 31 May 20X1, and have approached the auditors for advice because they are unsure whether the company can be considered a going concern.
State the importance of the going concern concept in the preparation of financial statements, and describe the effect on the financial statements if the company:
- is considered a going concern, although there are significant doubts about this.
- is not considered a going concern
Going concern is fundamental underlying assumption •
Assumption that business can continue operating for foreseeable future •
(1) Disclosure of:
- statement of relevant facts •
- nature of concern •
- assumptions made in using going concern basis •
- plans and actions taken •
(2) Not considered a going concern:
- Statement that accounts not prepared on going concern basis ie, prepared on a break up basis
- Assets written down to recoverable amounts •
- Liabilities re-assessed •
- And reclassified from long to short term
During the course of the audit of Beacon Ltd for the year ended 30 November 20X2 you discovered that on 25 January 20X3 a liquidator was appointed at Gamlec Ltd, a major customer of Beacon Ltd. The balance due from Gamlec Ltd at 30 November 20X2 was £150,000.
Requirement
Identify the matters to which you would direct your attention after the reporting period date
- Consider whether provision in place •
- Whether any monies re amount outstanding received from Gamlec since reporting period date
- Correspondence from liquidator/likelihood of receipts •
- Whether any additional goods despatched to Gamlec •
- Whether liquidation of major customer will impact on going concern status of Beacon/provides evidence of problems in the industry
The directors of Pinot plc have included the following note in the accounts for the year ended 31 December 20X3:
“The company reached agreement with its lenders, in October 20X3, to extend the maturities of its debt facilities until September 20X4, waive all existing covenant breaches and reduce interest costs.
All preconditions contained in the facilities agreement have now been satisfied.
The company is working on initiatives to significantly reduce its current debt levels and is to explore opportunities to raise further funds by September 20X4. Based on progress to date, the directors remain confident that the company will be successful in achieving its strategy.
While there can be no certainty, the directors believe that the adoption of the going concern basis is appropriate in the preparation of the financial statements.
If adoption of the going concern basis was not appropriate, adjustments would be required to write down assets to their recoverable value, to reclassify non-current assets as current assets and to provide for any further liabilities that might arise.”
Requirement
Describe, with reasons, the possible effects of this note on the auditor’s report for the year ended 31 December 20X3
Unmodified opinion if note considered adequate •
Material Uncertainty related to Going Concern paragraph •
Drawing users’ attention to note •
Statement that opinion not modified in this respect •
If note inadequate or disagree with basis of preparation – modified opinion
Siskin Ltd conducts all its sales on a cash basis. The managing director and majority shareholder of Siskin Ltd has provided a written representation in respect of the completeness of cash sales.
Requirement
What additional matters would you consider in determining whether or not you would rely on this representation?
Whether to rely on written representation:
- Internal controls in place over cash sales/segregation of duties •
- Whether independent analytical review of GP%/reconciliations •
- Whether GP% in line with industry sector
- Integrity/attitude of MD/well informed •
- Lifestyle of MD in relation to stated income •
- Whether audit testing consistent with representations
During the audit of Poplar Ltd for the year ended 31 January 20X3 you have been assigned the responsibility of checking the cash at bank figure in the statement of financial position.
While checking the bank reconciliation you discovered that receipts from customers, listed as outstanding lodgements at the year end, were cleared through the bank on 14 February 20X3.
Requirement
Explain why this matter should be investigated further.
- Cash book may have been left open after year end (inappropriate cut-off)/overstatement of cash/impact on trade receivables collection period
- Management to be informed of delay in banking •
- Poor cash management/cash flow –
- Teeming and lading (delayed accounting fraud)
You are the auditor of Bomburst Ltd (Bomburst). An extract from the directors’ report states:
‘The company always adheres to its policy to comply with the terms of payment agreed with suppliers.’
However, during your audit work on the year-end trade payables balance you found evidence of a number of suppliers requesting payment from Bomburst on overdue invoices.
State the actions you would take and outline the implications for your auditor’s report.
Actions 24.11
- Discuss with directors the inconsistency between directors’ report and auditor’s understanding of the entity
- Ascertain if there is a legitimate reason for the inconsistency
- if the auditor’s understanding is incomplete or incorrect, then consider whether further audit evidence needs to be obtained in relation to trade payables
- If there is no legitimate reason for the inconsistency, ask the directors to change the directors’ report
- If the directors refuse to change the director’s report, consider whether this raises doubt about their integrity and the reliability of audit evidence
- Bring the matter to the attention of the audit partner •
- If issue cannot be resolved through discussion, ask directors to seek legal consultation •
- Notify directors in writing of concerns/document reasons •
- Obtain own legal advice •
- Use right to be heard at AGM to notify shareholders of inconsistency •
- In extreme, might consider resignation and circulation of statement of circumstances •
- Implications for auditor’s report
Describe the inconsistency in the ‘Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006 section’ of the auditor’s report
- Auditors are also required to include a section headed “Matters on which we are required to report by exception”
- The auditor should describe the misstatement regarding Bomburst’s compliance with suppliers’ payment terms in this section
Your firm has been engaged by the directors of Bilko Inc (Bilko), a company based overseas, to undertake a review of and provide an assurance report on the year-end financial information of its UK branch.
The terms of the engagement include making enquiries of management, applying analytical procedures to the financial information and assessing whether the accounting policies and presentation have been consistently applied unless otherwise
disclosed.
Requirement
Outline the matters to be included in your firm’s assurance report to the directors of Bilko to ensure that the purpose and scope of the engagement is clear.
Responsibility of management
– to prepare the financial information •
Responsibilities of practitioner •
- To provide limited assurance –
- Financial information free from material misstatements –
- Limited to enquiries and analytical procedures –
- Not an audit –
- Do not express an audit opinion –
- Reference to standards/criteria (eg, ISRE 2400 Engagements to Review Historical Financial Statements)
Conclusion •
Expressed negatively –
‘Nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe that the accompanying financial statements do not give a true and fair view’
- Disclaimer of responsibility – do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company
Your firm has completed the external audit of the financial statements of Roses Ltd (Roses) for the year ended 31 December 20X9 and an unmodified auditor’s report was signed by the engagement partner on 1 March 20X0.
Your firm’s auditor’s report has been provided to the directors who plan to issue the financial statements and auditor’s report to the shareholders on 30 March 20X0.
While reading today’s newspaper, 23 March 20X0, you discover that Meadow Ltd (Meadow), a major customer of Roses, went into liquidation on 15 March 20X0.
You were the audit senior on the audit of Roses and you recall that Meadow owed a material amount to Roses, at 31 December 20X9, for goods purchased. This amount remained outstanding at the conclusion of the subsequent events review.
You have informed the engagement partner of your discovery.
Requirements
Discuss the issues arising as a result of the newspaper article and state what, if any, action your firm should take.
Liquidation of customer is a material adjusting subsequent event •
The audit firm has no responsibility to search for subsequent events after the auditor’s report is issued but needs to consider action where it becomes aware of material facts affecting the financial statements
The firm should discuss with management its intentions regarding any amendments to the financial statements
Perform procedures to ascertain if any amount is recoverable, eg, review correspondence with liquidators
Carry out procedures to ascertain the impact of a loss of major customer on the going concern basis of accounting
If management amend the financial statements the firm should undertake audit procedures in respect of those amendments and reissue the auditor’s report accordingly on the new financial statements
If management refuse to amend the financial statements and auditor agrees then no further action is necessary
If the auditors consider the financial statements are no longer true and fair in the absence of any amendments they should request that management do not issue the financial statements
If management do issue the financial statements then the auditors need to prevent reliance by the shareholders on the audit opinion
Auditors could use their right to speak at the company’s AGM •
Or resign and have written representations circulated to shareholders •
Auditors should also obtain legal advice if the directors refuse to make necessary amendments
Describe the auditors’ responsibilities, in the UK, with respect to forming and reporting their opinion on a directors’ report which is included in a company’s annual report containing financial statements.
Auditor should read other information in annual report including the directors’ report •
Both the Companies Act 2006 and ISA (UK) 720
The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Other Information require the auditor to state in its report on the company’s annual accounts whether, in its opinion, the information given in the directors’ report is consistent with the financial statements
Where the information given is consistent the auditor should state this in the ‘Other information’ section
Where the auditor’s opinion is that the directors’ report contains an uncorrected material misstatement, then the auditor shall explain the nature of the inconsistency in the ‘Other information’ section
You are the audit senior on the external audit of Dug Ltd (Dug) for the year ended 31 January 20X1. In January 20X1 Dug sold some office equipment to the wife of Dug’s managing director.
The audit junior has noted that the sale has not been disclosed in the note to the financial statements detailing related party transactions and has suggested the inclusion of an emphasis of matter paragraph in the auditor’s report to highlight this issue.
Requirement
Comment on the suitability or otherwise of the audit junior’s suggestion
Failure to disclose a material related party transaction results in a material misstatement in the preparation of the financial statements.
Therefore, the audit opinion should be modified with a qualified (except for) opinion, and the reason for the material misstatement in the auditor’s report should give details of the related party transaction.
An emphasis of matter paragraph is used where the auditor considers it necessary to draw users’ attention to a matter which is presented correctly in the financial statements but where the audit opinion would not be qualified in respect of the matter in the emphasis of matter paragraph.
The audit junior’s suggestion is therefore unsuitable, an emphasis of matter paragraph is not appropriate.