Subcultures Of Deliquency And The Labelling Theory Flashcards
Chicago school of criminology
- introduced new sociological methods of research: statistical analysis, life-history documents, field studies, case studies, interviews, ethnography (description of customs and cultures), participant observation
→ hands-on projects
→ ecological analysis (the city is a laboratory) - main research problem: the impact of industrial and commercial expansion on the metabolism of local communities
Chicago school of criminology—Shaw and McKay
Social disorganization theory
→ method: statistical analysis of crime rates
- believed that society/social structures causes criminality; criticized positivism
- studied the link between urban growth and juvenile delinquency
→ social, economic, and cultural environment
zones of transition vs the suburbs
- zones of transition: areas for industry and commerce (consisted of industrial workers, the poor, and immigrants)
→ disorganization: ethnic heterogeneity, conflicting moral values, lack opportunities/skills to obtain a luxury lifestyle, youth unsupervised, tradition of delinquency
- the suburbs: residential neighborhoods with upper and middle class residents
→ conventional values: homogenous population, sense of community, valued welfare of children/formal education/ leisure-time activities, law-abiding behaviour
Conclusion: juvenile delinquency tends to increase with social disorganization (zones of transition) and decline in areas dominated by conventional social strictures (suburbs); delinquency is correlated to sociodemographic characteristics and the social problems of each community
Delinquent subcultures—Cohen
- Studied the conflict between dominant values and subcultures (deviant values)
- believed that sociology has failed to study the causes of delinquency; criticized anomie theory
- delinquent subcultures as an adjustment mechanism
→ reaction formation as a result of the rejection of middle-class values and being rejected by institutions (school) - female delinquency: women are less likely to misbehave; socialized to conform to their gender roles (delinquency harms their social status)
- middle-class delinquency: gender anxiety; boys raised by their mothers feel the need to affirm their masculinity and reject conduct norms that have a feminine connotation (good and respectable behaviour, empathy)
Delinquent subcultures—Miller
- Criticized Cohen’s ideas
→ rather than gang members being social failures, they are capable people attempting to achieve success through illicit means because the gang has something positive to offer - working-class values: prove toughness, smartness (street smart), thrill, excitement, adventure, overcome obstacles, autonomy
- Believed female-headed households were the factor that pushed boys into delinquency
→ lack of male role model causes an identity crisis that can be solved by joining a gang (offers a sense of belonging and opportunity to gain social status)
Delinquency and drift
- Crime should be studied in relation to criminal law and agencies that define certain actions as infraction
- criminals are not fundamentally different than non-criminals (often share values)
- delinquents have two mindframes:
→ favourable towards delinquency and material gains
→ importance of conventional values and culture - drift: delinquent is not fully committed to either culture *
- two situations:
→ apprehension: when delinquents are exposed they express regret; does not entirely reject conventional values
→ company: delinquents in company with their peers do not commit entirely to the delinquent values; use toxic masculinity to hide insecurities - Techniques that encourage delinquents more:
→ neutralization: excuses to do the delinquent act (shield from guilt)
→ preparation: development of the skills required for delinquency
→ desperation: feeling lack of control (response to anxiety about masculinity and inevitable events)
The labelling perspective/theory
- believed that social reality and its values and meanings are not fixed; they are constructed through social interaction (social construction)
→ crime and deviance are defined by society (society constructs the meaning of deviance through labelling)
→ construction is unequal (some people have more power than others) - societal reaction: designation of certain acts as deviant or criminal; deviance is not the behavour or act itself but rather the application of rules by others to an offender (response to behaviour)
- primary deviance: “original” deviant behaviour caused by multiple factors
- secondary deviance: how society reacts to primary deviance (imposition of labels)