Blackness, Race, and Criminology Flashcards
Race
Human differences historically recognized
→ physical traits, ethnicity, place of origin, national affiliation
→ associated with innate characteristics (intellect, habits, morality)
Modern understanding of race
Racial discourse amplified differences and categorized human groups according to a social hierarchy (racism)
→ innate differences, biological, different “nature”
→ colonialism justified the dominance over groups considered “primitive”
Mainstream criminology and racism
- Assumed biological behavioural differences between races
- justified the differential treatment of non-white groups
- treated non-white groups as an “object of study”
- rejected the knowledge and perspective of non-white groups
- viewed the western criminological knowledge as the scientific truth
Critical race studies and critical criminology
- Challenged the racist assumptions of mainstream criminology
→ racial inequalities in the social construction of crime (labelling)
→ colonialism and white dominance in the political system (knowledge as power, construction of reality)
Race and criminology in North America
- Slavery, segregation, modern “colour-blind” racism
→ slave regime: criminalization punished those who resisted, revolted, or escaped
→ segregation: criminalization upheld exclusion
→ “colour-blind” racism: criminalization allegedly equal but over-policing, surveillance, and punishment (restriction of civil rights and socioeconomic opportunities for convicts)
Racialization of crime
- Criminal Justice system as the rearticulation of state-enforced control after slavery
→ discriminatory treatment: over-surveillance, higher chances of being stopped/charged/questioned, more severe sentences, disproportionately incarcerated
→ vulnerable to harm and death
→ demonization and association of blackness and criminality
Historical association between blackness and criminality (social function)
- Slavery; the presence of black people in public raised suspicion of “runaway”
- maintenance of the “racial order” (subalternization of black communities)
- criminalization of migration from non-white nations
Filtering of crime
- most people commit crime but few are caught, arrested, charged, convicted and imprisoned
→ labelling and race: blacks are disproportionately policed and more likely to be considered guilty
→ criminal behavior is distributed across race and class
Racial profiling
- Police officers have a discretion to decide how and where to seek out crime based on ideas about who is suspicious
→ stereotypes and popular beliefs about race (perceived black youth as possible gang members)
→ self-fulfilling prophecy: the more a group is targeted, the higher chances that criminality will be discovered
→ over-policing as violence: constant fear, feeling unsafe to walk in public
Surveillance versus privacy
Collection of personal information for a police database
→ carding: identity checks, searches, seizures, car stops
The war on drugs
- Fear of racialized gangs and violence stemming from the drug business
→ violence out of control, gangs are stronger than police - police control over racialized communities through the criminalization of drugs
→ war: police campaign to eradicate illegal substances that were believed to be ravaging communities
→ gave law enforcement officers more power to intervene over suspected individuals (associated blackness and drugs)
→ state invested in law enforcement (hostility, repression) instead of welfare/assistance programs
→ increased black incarceration
Prime Minister Harper
- brought back the visibility on the war on drugs
→ invested in building and filling prisons
→ social investments were cut on almost every sector besides prison and the military - National anti-drug strategy (NADS): more than 3/4 of federal funding went towards policing efforts rather than treatment and support programs
Impacts of drug prohibition
- Public health problems: street violence, stronger criminal networks, spread of diseases, overdose deaths
- social factors: isolation childhood abuse, trauma, socioeconomic circumstances
Moderate (non-abusive) use of illegal substances
- Cause little pharmacological harm
- advocation for harm-reduction approaches
→ apply the same policies to illegal substances as fast food
→ move towards decriminalization of non-violent drug crimes and regulation of illegal drugs