subcultural theories of crime Flashcards
define goals
idea of mainstream success
define legitimate and illegitimate means
ways individuals achieve mainstream goals
legitimate = gaining qualifications
illegitimate = refers to crime
define utilitarian and non utilitarian crime
utili = crime that brings success and material gains
non - utili = the opposite
overview of subcultural theorists
explain C&D in terms of delinquent subcultures = groups who strongly deviate or oppose to the values of mainstream society
how are subcultural theorists similar to Merton
they argue that not everyone can achieve these goals through legitimate means they focus on crime as a lower class phenomenon
How do subcultural theorists differ from Merton
They focus on group responses to strain and look at non - utilitarian crime
What does Cohen’s study explore
it explores why WC boys join delinquent subcultures and why they are more likely to commit crime
What does Cohen believe
everyone learns the same values and goals through socialisation (part of learning value consensus)
- This means WC boys have the same life goals as MC boys
why are WC less likely to achieve at skl
cultural deprivation
why are they more likely to turn to delinquent subcultures
- due to having poor attitudes to skl and ed = turn to anti subcultures/ try to use shortcuts to try and achieve mainstream success goals
how does this link to status frustration
WC boys turn to delinquent subcultures because they are not getting the status they crave
- WC boys denied their status from society = turn to crime allows them to get the status they crave
give examples of positive things in delinquent subcultures
vandalism , truancy
give 2 critisms of Cohen
- some members could be socialised into deviant values rather than sharing the same as everyone else
- Marxists = Cohen ignores the social class inequality
what does Cloward and Ohlin suggest
there is:
legitimate opportunity through gang membership
illegitimate opportunity structure = accepting social means to achieve social goals
What do cloward and Ohlin argue
not everyone can easily engage in criminal activity.
- we can’t assume that people that can’t get wealthy will turn to crime
- e.g. there may be a existing subculture in some areas and some areas don’t