SU 1 - Foundation of Internal Auditing Flashcards
Advisory and related client service activities, the nature and scope of which are agreed with the client and which are intended to add value and improve an organization’s governance, risk management, and control processes without the internal auditor assuming management responsibility.
Consulting Services
The highest level governing body (e.g board of directors, a supervisory board, or a board of governors or trustees) charged with the responsibility to direct and/or oversee the organization’s activities and hold senior management accountable.
Board
A specific internal audit assignment, task, or review activity, such as an internal audit, control self-assessment review, fraud examination, or consultancy.
Engagement
A department, division, team of consultants, or other practitioner(s) that provide independent, objective assurance and consulting services designed to add value and improve an organization’s operations.
Internal Audit Activity
The top position in an organization responsible for internal audit activities.
Chied Audit Executive (CAE)
An independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization’s operations; brings a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control, and governance processes.
Internal Auditing
Objective examination of evidence for the purpose of providing an independent assessment on risk management, control, or governance processes for an organization.
Assurance Engagement
In terms of the internal audit activity, a formal written document that defines the activity’s purpose, authority, and responsibility. It establishes the internal audit activity’s position within the organization; authorizes access to records, personnel, and physical properties relevant to the performance of engagements; and defines the scope of internal audit activities.
Charter
The conceptual framework that organizes the authoritative guidance promulgated by The IIA.
International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF)
An unbiased mental attitude that allows internal auditors to perform engagements in such a manner that they believe in their work product and that no significant quality compromises are made. It requires that internal auditors do not subordinate their judgment on audit matters to others.
Objectivity
Principles relevant to the profession and practice of internal auditing and Rules of Conduct that describe behavior expected of internal auditors.
Code of Ethics
The internal audit staff of Jack’s Flooring Emporium consistently struggles to demonstrate the Core Principle of “provides risk-based assurance” while performing audit engagements. Which is an example of a consequence for not demonstrating this Core Principle?
a) The internal audit activity is likely to miss emerging risks, and adding organizational value will be limited.
b) Management and the board will not have independent validation that its controls are designed properly and are working as expected to mitigate risks.
c) The internal audit activity may lose the trust placed in it, and consequently, its credibility to provide independent and objective assurance and advice.
d) Management and the board are unlikely to trust internal audit observations as being accurate and complete.
b) Management and the board will not have independent validation that its controls are designed properly and are working as expected to mitigate risks.
Rationale
For an internal audit activity to be considered effective, all Principles should be present and operating effectively.
Missing emerging risks, and limiting organizational value is a consequence of not demonstrating the core principle of “is insightful, proactive, and future-focused.”
Management and the board’s unlikeliness to trust internal audit observations as being accurate and complete is a consequence of not demonstrating the core principle of “is objective, and free from undue influence (independent).
Losing trust place in internal audit, and it credibility to provide independent and objective assurance and advice is a consequence of not demonstrating the core principle of “demonstrates integrity.”
During an audit of the manufacturing division of a defense contractor, the auditor comes across a scheme that looks like the company is inappropriately adding costs to a cost-plus government contract. The auditor discusses the matter with senior management, which suggests that the auditor seek an opinion from legal counsel. The auditor does so, and, upon review of the government contract, legal counsel indicates that the practice is questionable but offers the opinion that it is not technically in violation of the contract. Based on legal counsel’s decision, the auditor decides to omit any discussion of the practice in the formal audit report that goes to management and the audit committee. She does, however, informally communicate legal counsel’s decision to management. Has the auditor violated the The IIA’s Code of Ethics?
a) Yes. It is a violation because all important information, even if resolved, should be reported to the audit committee.
b) No. If a fraud is suspected, it should be resolved at the divisional level where it is taking place.
c) Yes. Internal legal counsel’s opinion is not sufficient. The auditor should have sought advice from outside legal counsel.
d) No. The auditor has followed up on the matter with appropriate personnel in the organization and has reached a conclusion that no fraud is involved.
d) No. The auditor has followed up on the matter with appropriate personnel in the organization and has reached a conclusion that no fraud is involved.
Rationale
Although an argument can be made that it would be common sense to bring the issue to both the audit committee and management, there is no evidence that the auditor is deliberately withholding information. Therefore, there is no violation of the Code of Ethics.
The accounts payable manager for an airline requests a consulting review of the electronic submission of invoices. Three employees in the department handle this particular function. The manager feels that there is a bottleneck in the process that is caused by poor working practices on the part of the employees. The manager wants internal audit to validate this. Is this an assignment the chief audit executive should undertake?
a) No, the Standards specifically restrict the conduct of such reviews.
b) Yes, the assignment is well defined and has a clear objective.
c) Yes, this is a request that is well suited to be performed by internal audit.
d) No. This is a function of management, and the poor working practices should be reviewed by the accounts payable manager.
d) No. This is a function of management, and the poor working practices should be reviewed by the accounts payable manager.
Rationale
Supervision is a function of management, and the poor working practices should be reviewed by the accounts payable manager, not internal audit.
The purpose of The IIA’s Code of Ethics is to promote an ethical culture in the profession of internal auditing, and is necessary and appropriate for the profession of internal auditing. The Code of Ethics includes Integrity, Confidentiality, Objectivity, and Competency. Which best describes the principle of Integrity?
a) It enables internal auditors to make balanced assessments of all relevant circumstances.
b) It is characterized by respect for the value and ownership of information received during an engagement.
c) It establishes trust, and thus provides the basis for reliance on internal auditor judgment.
d) It requires internal auditors to apply the knowledge, skills, and experience while performing internal audit services.
c) It establishes trust, and thus provides the basis for reliance on internal auditor judgment.
Rationale
The integrity of internal auditors establishes trust, and thus provides the basis for reliance on their judgment.
The principle of Objectivity enables internal auditors to make a balanced assessment of all the relevant circumstances, and are not unduly influenced by their own interests or by others in forming judgements.
The principle of Competency requires internal auditors to apply the knowledge, skills, and experience needed in the performance of internal audit services.
The principle of Confidentiality is characterized by respect for the value and ownership of information received during an engagement.
Which of the following would be an advantage of conducting environmental audits under the direction of the internal audit activity?
a) Technical expertise is more readily available.
b) Independence and authority are already in place.
c) Internal audit work products are confidential.
d) The financial aspects are de-emphasized.
b) Independence and authority are already in place.
Rationale
The internal audit activity normally has a broad charter and realm of responsibility and can readily assimilate the new auditing function.
Which statement best describes the difference between Assurance services and Consulting services?
a) Assurance services are specifically requested by the senior management and the board; whereas, consulting services are specifically requested by senior management and the process owner.
b) Assurance services involve an internal auditor’s objective assessment of evidence to provide an independent opinion or conclusion; whereas, consulting services relate to an internal auditor obtaining advice from an external source.
c) Assurance services involve an internal auditor’s objective assessment of evidence to provide an independent opinion or conclusion; whereas, consulting services are advisory in nature.
d) Assurance services guarantee that the internal auditor’s assessment is full and complete; whereas, consulting services are only advisory in nature and are performed at the specific request of an engagement client.
c) Assurance services involve an internal auditor’s objective assessment of evidence to provide an independent opinion or conclusion; whereas, consulting services are advisory in nature.
Rationale
Assurance services involve the internal auditor’s objective assessment of evidence to provide opinions or conclusions regarding an entity, operation, function m process system or other subject matters.
Consulting services are advisory in nature and are generally performed at the specific request of an engagement client.
An internal auditor has been assigned to audit a foreign subsidiary. The auditor is aware that the social climate of the country is such that “facilitating payments” (bribes) are often used to make things happen and are an accepted part of the society. The auditor has completed an audit of the division and has found significant weaknesses relating to important controls. The division manager offers the auditor a substantial “facilitating payment” to omit the audit findings from the audit report, with the provision that the auditor can revisit the division in six months to verify that the problem areas have been properly addressed. The auditor should
a) not accept the payment, since such acceptance would be in conflict with The IIA’s Code of Ethics.
b) accept the payment, because it has the effect of doing the greatest good for the greatest number. The auditor is better off, the division is better off, and the organization is better off because there is strong motivation to correct the deficiencies found by the auditor.
c) not accept the payment, but omit the findings as long as there is a verification visit in six months.
d) accept the offer, since it is consistent with the ethical concepts of the country in which the division is doing business.
a) not accept the payment, since such acceptance would be in conflict with The IIA’s Code of Ethics.
Rationale
The auditor should not accept the payment, since such acceptance would be in conflict with The IIA’s Code of Ethics.
The Standards help clarify the nature of the charter by providing guidelines as to its contents. Which of the following is suggested in the Standards as part of the charter?
a) Types of revisions to the charter that are allowed without additional approval
b) Scope of internal auditing activities
c) Department’s ability to generate an internal audit plan without needing further approval
d) Length of tenure for chief audit executive
b) Scope of internal auditing activities
Rationale
As described in the interpretation of Standard 1000, “The internal audit charter establishes the internal audit activity’s position within the organization, including the nature of the chief audit executive’s functional reporting relationship with the board; authorizes access to records, personnel, and physical properties relevant to the performance of engagements; and defines the scope of internal audit activities.”
It does not specify the length of tenure of any internal audit staff. Revisions to the charter require approval. The annual audit plan will still need approval even with a signed charter.
According to IIA Standard 1010 - Recognizing Mandatory Guidance in the Internal Audit Charter, the mandatory nature of which of the following must be recognized in the internal audit charter?
a) The Mission of Internal Audit.
b) Implementation Guides.
c) Practice Guides.
d) The Standards.
d) The Standards.
Rationale
According to IIA Standard 1010 - Recognizing Mandatory Guidance in the Internal Audit Charter, the mandatory nature of the Core Principles for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing, the Code of Ethics, the Standards, and the Definition of Internal Auditing must be recognized in the internal audit charter.
Implementation guides and practice guides are supplemental guidance. While the Mission of Internal Auditing is mandatory guidance, there is no requirement for recognition in the internal audit charter.
Which of the following is true of consulting engagements?
a) Assurance engagements and consulting engagements are mutually exclusive; they must be kept separate and distinct.
b) The auditor engaged in consulting may gain increased knowledge of the organization’s processes while not impairing the attribute of objectivity.
c) Consulting engagements come exclusively from management; it would be inappropriate to use an assurance engagement to promote consulting work.
d) Internal auditors may perform a consulting engagement in lieu of an assurance engagement to avoid providing an opinion.
b) The auditor engaged in consulting may gain increased knowledge of the organization’s processes while not impairing the attribute of objectivity.
Rationale
Auditors performing consulting services may gain improved knowledge about the organization and, since this knowledge is gained during auditing activities rather than in management or operations, it should not impair objectivity.
The IIA defines consulting as “advisory and related client services activities, the nature and scope of which are agreed with the client, are intended to add value and improve an organization’s governance, risk management, and control processes without the internal auditor assuming management responsibility.” Oftentimes, consulting engagements are performed at the request of management to help ensure that objectives have been established, risks have been identified, and controls have been put in place to make the operation successful. However, the results of an assurance engagement may suggest possible consulting engagements, and vice versa.
In all situations, a consulting engagement should not be conducted in an attempt to circumvent assurance engagement requirements such as the need to provide an opinion at the end of an engagement.
A Code of Ethics Rule of Conduct specifies that “internal auditors be prudent in the use and protection of information acquired in the course of their duties.” To which Code of Ethics does this rule apply?
a) Confidentiality.
b) Objectivity.
c) Competency.
d) Integrity.
a) Confidentiality.
Rationale
The Rules of Conduct for Confidentiality state Internal auditors:
3.1 Shall be prudent in the use and protection of information acquired in the course of their duties.
3.2 Shall not use information for any personal gain or in any manner that would be contrary to the law or detrimental to the legitimate and ethical objectives of the organization.
A chief audit executive (CAE) tours a company that was just acquired by his company. The existing auditor shows the CAE the different aspects of the plant, including maintenance, inventory, and the shipping department. The CAE notices a revenue room where the day’s cash sales are secured. The CAE asks to tour this room as well. The auditor quickly responds that no one is allowed in there, not even internal audit, due to the amount of cash kept there. The CAE should have an issue with this based on what aspect of the International Professional Practices Framework?
a) Responsibilities
b) Organization and reporting structure
c) Authority
d) Independence and objectivity
c) Authority
Rationale
One aspect of authority is that an internal audit activity must have appropriate, unfettered access to records, physical property, and personnel in order to perform engagements and must declare internal auditors’ accountability for safeguarding assets and confidentiality.
An internal audit charter is a formal document that defines the internal audit activity’s
a) vision, mission, and goals.
b) purpose, mission, and vision.
c) purpose, authority, and responsibility.
d) uthority, mission, and goals.
c) purpose, authority, and responsibility.
Rationale
Per Standard 1000, the purpose, authority, and responsibility of the internal audit activity must be formally defined in an internal audit charter.
Which consulting activity would be appropriately performed by the internal audit function?
a) Reviewing systems of control before implementation
b) Drafting procedures for systems of control
c) Designing systems of control
d) Installing systems of control
a) Reviewing systems of control before implementation
Rationale
Reviewing systems, even before implementation, is an activity appropriately performed by the internal audit function, and it does not impair objectivity.
The other three options are presumed to impair either objectivity or independence.
An airline company includes in the data provided to its board of directors the results of customer satisfaction surveys, its lost-and-found statistics, and information on the cleanliness of operations. This is an example of assurance related to
a) external financial reporting.
b) total quality management (TQM) surveys.
c) results of consultant work.
d) non-financial reporting.
d) non-financial reporting.
Rationale
Assurance over reporting can include internal and/or external financial and non-financial reporting.
Which of the following would constitute a violation of The IIA’s Code of Ethics?
a) An internal auditor has been assigned to do an audit of the warehousing function six months from now. He has no expertise in this area, but he accepted the assignment anyway. He has signed up for continuing professional education courses in warehousing; the courses will be completed before his assignment begins.
b) An internal auditor is content with her career and has come to look at it as a regular 9-to-5 job. She has not engaged in continuing professional education or other activities to improve her effectiveness during the last three years. However, she feels that she is performing the same quality work she always has.
c) An internal auditor discovers a potential internal financial fraud. The books appear to have been adjusted to properly reflect the loss associated with the potential fraud. The internal auditor discusses the potential fraud with the external auditor when the external auditor reviews the workpapers detailing the incident.
d) An internal auditor has accepted an assignment to audit the electronics manufacturing division. She has recently joined the internal auditing department. However, she was senior auditor for the external audit of the electronics manufacturing division and has audited many electronics companies during the past two years.
b) An internal auditor is content with her career and has come to look at it as a regular 9-to-5 job. She has not engaged in continuing professional education or other activities to improve her effectiveness during the last three years. However, she feels that she is performing the same quality work she always has.
Rationale
Not engaging in continuing professional education or similar activities would be a violation of Competency Rule of Conduct 4.3, which requires auditors to continually strive for improvement in their proficiency and in the effectiveness of their audits.
In a review of travel and entertainment expenses, the internal auditor questions the business purposes of an officer’s reimbursed travel expenses. The officer promises to compensate the organization for the questioned amounts by not claiming legitimate expenses in the future. If the officer makes good on the promise, the internal auditor
a) should still include the finding in the audit report.
b) can ignore the original charging of the non-business expenses.
c) should recommend that the officer forfeit any frequent flyer miles received as part of the questionable travel.
d) should inform the tax authorities in any event
a) should still include the finding in the audit report.
Rationale
This applies to the integrity and objectivity principles of The IIA’s Code of Ethics. Item 2.3 of the Code requires internal auditors to disclose all material facts known to them that, if not disclosed, may distort the reporting of activities under review. Item 1.2 also states that internal auditors shall observe the law and make disclosures expected by the law and the profession. The Standards require the chief audit executive to distribute audit reports to those members of the organization who can take appropriate action.
Company A has a formal corporate code of ethics; company B does not. Company A’s code of ethics covers purchase agreements and relationships with vendors along with many other issues to guide individual behavior in the company. Which of the following statements can be logically inferred?
a) Company A has a lower need for controls related to purchase agreements and vendor relationships than does company B.
b) Company A exhibits a higher standard of ethical behavior than does company B.
c) The absence of a formal corporate code of ethics in company B would prevent a successful audit of ethical behavior in that company.
d) Company A has established objective criteria by which an employee’s actions can be evaluated.
d) Company A has established objective criteria by which an employee’s actions can be evaluated.
Rationale
A formalized corporate code of ethics presents objective criteria by which actions can be evaluated and would thus serve as criteria against which activities could be evaluated. The existence of a corporate code of ethics, by itself, does not ensure a higher standard of ethical behavior. A code of ethics must be complemented by follow-up policies and monitoring activities to ensure compliance. Standards that would influence individual actions can occur in other places than the corporate code of ethics. The existence of a code of ethics does not remove the need for related controls.
Abiding by the Mission of Internal Audit, the Core Principles, the Definition of Internal Auditing, the Code of Ethics, and the Standards is mandatory for
a) internal auditors and consultants only.
b) IIA members and practicing internal auditors only.
c) IIA members, practicing internal audit professionals, and Certified Internal Auditors only.
d) Certified Internal Auditors only.
c) IIA members, practicing internal audit professionals, and Certified Internal Auditors only.
Rationale
IIA members, practicing internal audit professionals, and Certified Internal Auditors are required to abide by the Mission of Internal Audit, the Core Principles, the Definition of Internal Auditing, the Code of Ethics, and the Standards.