Studies Paper 1 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Kelman (1958)

A

identifies the following 3 types of conformity, going from weakest to strongest: Compliance, Identification, internalisation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Asch Line Experiment (1955)

A

The aim of these experiments was to find out the extent to which people would conform to an obviously wrong majority consensus.

123 male participants

participants were put in groups of 7-9 confederates

18 trials completed

75% of participants conformed to at least one incorrect answer

5% conformed to every incorrect answer

distortions of: perception
Judgement and action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explanations of Conformity - Dutch and Gerard (1955)

A

identified Normative and Informational SI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Zimbardo: Stanford Prison Experiment

A

The aim of the Stanford prison study (Zimbardo et al (1973)) was to find out how much people conform to the social roles of prisoner and guard in a prison situation.

21 male participants form a total of 75 applicants

split into 10 guards and 11 prisoners

guards worked 8 hour shifts and could go home after.

prisoners were arrested in their homes by real police and were subject to official processes.

prisoners wore standard issue prison outfits

scheduled to run for 2 weeks but cut short due to psychological trauma (6 days)

guards became increasingly sadistic

Zimbardo was involved (researcher bias)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Stanford Prison Experiment

A

STRENGTHS

Demonstrates the effects of conforming to social roles. Lead to a reform in the way juvenile offenders are treated

WEAKNESSES

Lacks Ecological/External Validity

Ethical concerns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Milgram Obedience Study

A

40 males (20-50)

Experimenter wore a lab coat to create impression of authority

experimenter told the participant the test would involve giving increasingly powerful electric shocks to the learner from a machine in the room next door

Starting at 15 volts and increasing by 15 volts each time all the way up to 450 volts.

150 volts, the learner began to protest. These protests (pre-recorded and played via a tape recorder) increased in intensity with the increasing voltage. At 315 volts, the learner screamed in pain. After 330 volts, the learner went silent.

If the participant asked to stop the experiment, the experimenter would reply with one of four successive verbal prods:
“Please continue” or “please go on”

“The experiment requires that you continue”

“It is absolutely essential that you continue”

“You have no other choice, you must go on”

26 out of 40 participants (65%) administered shocks all the way up to the maximum of 450 volts.
40 out of 40 participants (100%) administered shocks up to 300 volts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strengths and weaknesses of Milgrams Study

A

Reliable as replicated studies have shown similar results

Milgram’s experiments demonstrate the extent to which humans obey authority – even if doing so may be dangerous. This is a valuable psychological insight that could have beneficial applications in society.

Unethical: Milgram’s study was initially considered so unethical that Milgram’s membership of the American Psychological Association was suspended.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Variables affecting Obedience (Milgram)

A

Proximity

Location

Uniform

All demonstrated by Milgram in variations of his study. all yielding varying results as a result of changing independent variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rotter (1966)

A

Developed a scale to measure a person’s locus of control

Internal: the person believes their own choices shape their life

External: The person believes their life is controlled by things out of their control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Moscovici (1969) Minority influence

A

Participants were divided into groups of 6 (4 real participants and 2 confederates) and told they were taking part in a study of visual perception. The participants were shown 36 shades of blue and asked to say out loud what the colour was.

In the control group (no confederates), participants said the colours were green 0.25% of the time.

In the inconsistent minority group (where confederates said 24/36 colours were green), participants said the colours were green 1.25% of the time.
In the consistent minority group (where confederates said 36/36 colours were green), participants said the colours were green 8.4% of the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Moscovici (1969) identified components of successful minority influence

A

Consistency

commitment

Flexibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly