Studies for Paper 1 Flashcards
Eagly (1978) - developmental psychology: obedience
found that a commonly held assumption was that women would be more susceptible to social influence than men
Milgram - developmental psychology: obedience
- he underestimated the importance of individual differences in obedience. His research was androcentric, i.e. focused on men and therefore finding can only be applied in male obedience
- it seems implausible that, given the large numbers of participants that were fully obedient , the vast majority would have grown up in a harsh environment with a punitive father, thus lacks face validity
- Studies of obedience carried out across cultures find similarly high levels of obedience to those found by Milgram. This shows that we are, by nature, social beings, heavily influenced by our social environment and setting – the power of the social situation.
Blass (1999) - developmental psychology obedience
studied 9 other replications of Milgram’s study which also had male and female participants. Consistent with Milgram’s own findings 8 out of 9 found no evidence of gender differences in obedience
Adorno - developmental psychology: obedience
thought that harsh upbringing and parenting affected how a child developed. Found that participants who grew up with strict parents who used physical punishments grew up to be very obedient. Under these conditions, children quickly learn to obey and develop a strong respect for authority.
Elms and Milgram - developmental psychology: obedience
research presented some important differences in the characteristics of the authoritarian personality and the characteristics of obedient participants, e.g. many of the obedient participants reported having a very good relationship with their parents, rather than having grown up in a very strict family environment associated with the authoritarian personality
Pavlov - classical conditioning
- developed the theory of classical conditioning from his research on the salivary response of dogs: his research generated quantitative, behavioural and therefore observable data, the amount of saliva produced by dogs in response to a learned, neutral stimulus. The response is referred to as Pavlovian conditioning.
- demonstrated a conditioned response with the sound of a bell, the bell was a neutral stimulus, noting that when the neutral stimulus was in close association with the dogs’ meals the dogs learned to associate the NS with food, e.g., the mere sound of the bell induced a drooling response in the dogs. Pavlov concluded that environmental stimuli that previously had no relation to a reflex action, e.g., the sound of a bell, could, through repeated pairings, trigger a salivation reflex and that through the process of associative learning – conditioning – the conditioned stimulus leads to a conditioned response.
- there are ethical issues surrounding the use of animals, especially Pavlov’s use of dogs and the invasive procedures used to measure saliva
Smith and Bond (1998) - developmental psychology: obedience
collectivist cultures, such as China or Israel, tend to behave more as a collectivist group based on interdependence, meaning that cooperation and compliance are regarded as important for the stability of the group
Hamilton and Sanders (1995) - developmental psychology: obedience
presented participants from US, Japan, and Russia with scenarios where a crime was either an individual’s idea or the order of a superior. Little responsibility was attributed to the person who acted criminally under orders, but that reversed when they acted on their own volition. However, cultural differences emerged: US participants attributed more personal responsibility to individuals acting criminally under orders than did the Japanese and Russian ones. Thus, obedience might be deduced to be more important in Japanese and Russian culture than US culture, i.e., obeying even criminally wrong orders might be seen as appropriate more in Japan and Russia than in the US.
Adorno - factors affecting obedience: personality
- studied over 2000 US students from mainly white, middle-class backgrounds, interviewing them about their early childhood experiences and using projective tests such as Rorschach ink plot tests and Thematic Apperception Tests to gain access to their unconscious thoughts, to access their level of obedience and prejudice. Adorno found that authoritarian adults came from a family environment that could be characterised as cold and unloving with a hostile atmosphere. Parents were aloof and controlling and typically insisted on high levels of achievement and self-discipline. The primary strategy used by such parents to ensure their children complied with their wishes was withdrawal of affection.
- developed several scales to measure aspects of behaviour and attitudes towards others, including ethnocentrism, i.e., preference for one’s own racial group, antisemitism, and the fascism scale – F-scale. The F scale measures authoritarian personality.
Middendrop and Meloen (1990) factors affecting obedience: personality
found that less well-educated people are consistently more authoritarian than well-educated people
Milgram - factors affecting obedience: personality
- also found that participants with lower levels of education tended to be more obedient than those with higher levels.
- accepted that there was some element of a dispositional or personality bias to obedience and disobedience/dissent, but he believed the situational or social context was more significant, e.g., the proximity of the victim and authority figure, the location and presence of disobedient peers. Milgram believed that the specific social situation participants found themselves in caused them to obey or disobey regardless of their personalities. He maintained that relying on an explanation of obedience based purely on authoritarianism lacks the flexibility to account for these situational variables
Elms and Milgram (1966) - factors affecting obedience: personality
after educational attainment was statistically controlled for, the more obedient subjects were still those who had higher F scale scores, i.e., were more authoritarian.
Burger (2009) - factors affecting obedience: personality
in a recent replication of Milgram’s experiment, found that although people who score high on empathy are more likely to protest against giving electric shock, this did not translate to lower levels of obedience.
Spector (1982) - factors affecting obedience: personality
found that a relationship exists between locus of control and leadership style, with internals being more persuasive and goal-oriented than externals.
Elms and Milgram (1974) - factors affecting obedience: personality
investigated the background of those participants classed as obedient in the first four of Milgram’s experiments. Interviews revealed that disobedient participants had a high internal locus of control and scored highly on a social responsibility scale.
Adorno - individual differences and developmental psychology
- argued that the authoritarian personality possessed specific traits or characteristics that meant they were more likely to be hostile towards people of a different ethnicity, social class or group, age, sexuality or other minority category.
- used clinical interviews and questionnaires and there are methodological issues with these. However, Adorno’s research was extensive, and his theories have been supported by a lot of subsequent research.
Rubinstein (1995) - individual differences and developmental psychology
measured the relationship between authoritarianism, religiosity, and gender attitudes in 165 Jewish students and found those higher in authoritarianism tended to be more religious and have more traditional attitudes to gender than did those lower in authoritarianism.
Whitley and Lee (2000) - individual differences and developmental psychology
assessed attitudes to homosexuality in 216 US students along with several personality variables, including authoritarianism. Authoritarianism proved to be the personality variable most strongly associated with homophobic attitudes.
Katz and Braly (1933) - individual differences and developmental psychology
questioned students at Princeton University in the US regarding their national stereotypes about other cultures. Participants had to pick five to six traits from a list of 84 personality traits – superstitious, lazy, ignorant etc. – that they thought represented the ethnic group. They found that the vast majority of participants – US students at a top US university – classified African-Americans as superstitious and ignorant, and Jews as shrewd.
Karlins at al. (1969) - individual differences and developmental psychology
repeated Katz and Braly’s research and found that while some national stereotypes had changed, others persisted. This suggests that culture does affect prejudice, but as cultures change, so do the prejudices that are held.