Studies( Barlett War Of The Ghost ) Flashcards
Serial reproduction
A technique where participants retell something to another participant to form a chain; this is how folk stories are passed down through cultures
Repeated reproduction
A technique where participants are asked to recall something again and again
Background to the study
-the war of the ghosts
-Chose the story as it would be unfamiliar as it is native American story
- hoped the unfamiliarity of the story would shed light on reconstructive nature of memory because his participants would be more likely to draw on their schemas to recall it
Aims
Test reconstructive memory using an unfamiliar story
Looking at whether or not personal schemas influence what is remembered from the story
Procedure
- Participants asked to read the war of the ghosts twice and asked to recall it
- used both serial reproduction and repeated reproduction to test the recall of the story
Serial reproduction(procedure)
- serial reproduction( used to read the story and then retell it to another participant 15 to 30 minutes later. Second participant then told the story to a third participant and so on)
Repeated reproduction(procedure)
- Same participant asked to write out the story after 15 minutes
- asked to recall story several minutes, hours, days,months and years later
Results
- barlett used qualified analysis to look for and interpret changes to stories that were recalled
- repeated reproductions tended to fellow a similar form, which means that the theme er outline of the story tended to remain in later reproductions
- both types of recall participants tried to make sense of the story by giving it meaning
- makes connections or giving reasons to events
- known as rationalisation
- participants tended to leave out unfamiliar or unpleasant parts of story
- details became familiarised or simplified
Strength of study
- Remembering story more naturalistic as a test of everyday memory
- same findings across other studies ( reliable)
- studies use of qualitative data
Weaknesses
- Not familiar story(story was not a everyday task)
- Barretts study is not as scientific as it could have been ( doesn’t follow standaralised procedure)
Sum it up
- Barlett research paved the way for modern day thinking bout reconstructive nature of memory
- procedure were not scientific his were reflected a qualitative nature that helps us to understandeveryday human nature