Studies And Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Genuine science

A

Based on evidence and data
Uses peer reviewed studies
Open to falsification and debate
Transparent about limitations
Follows the scientific method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pseudoscience

A

Based on anecdotes/testimonials
No credible sources or citations
Overconfident miracle claims
Lacks clarity, often emotionally persuasive
Relies on authority, not proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

RCT

A

Strongest for cause/effect
E.g. testing a new supplement vs placebo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cohort study

A

Long term trends, associations
E.g. tracking nutrient intake and injury risk over the years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cross sectional studies

A

Snapshot at one time
E.g. survey of protein intake in footballers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Meta analysis

A

Pooled data = big picture
E.g. summary of 20+ studies on Creatine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Case study

A

Deep dive into one case
E.g. one athletes diet + performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lab study

A

Controlled, specific
E.g. muscle breakdown after HIIT in lab setting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Selection bias

A

Choosing participants in a non -random way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Placebo effect

A

Believing a treatment works can alter results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Observer bias

A

Researchers expectations influence outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Confounding variable

A

Hidden factor affects both variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Publication bias

A

Positive results more likely to be published

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Critical appraisal

A

P - population = who was studied
I - intervention = what’s being tested
C - comparison = was there a control or placebo
O - outcome = what were the results, meaningful

Sample size, study length, funding, peer reviewed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Levels of evidence from strongest to weakest

A

Systematic reviews
RCTs
Cohort
Cross sectional
Case reports
Anecdotes, testimonials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Personalised nutrition

A

Based on genes, microbiome, data tracking

17
Q

Plant based diets in sport

A

More athletes thriving on vegan/veggie diets when well planned

18
Q

Recovery science

A

Focus on sleep, protein timing, HRV monitoring

19
Q

Low energy availability awareness

A

More focus on RED-S and mental health

20
Q

Tech in nutrition

A

Wearables, AI-based diet analysis, blood testing services

21
Q

Supplements

A

Shift toward evidence-based use over hype

22
Q

DEXA scan Pros and cons

A

Highly accurate, shows fat, bone, lean mass
Expensive, not portable

23
Q

Skinfold calipers - pros and cons

A

Cheap, quick
Needs skilled operator

24
Q

BIA (bioelectrical impedence) - pros and cons

A

Fast, accessible
Affected by hydration levels

25
Hydrostatic weighing - pros and cons
Very accurate Impractical, less common now
26
3D scanners/bodPod - pros and cons
High tech, non-invasive Expensive and limited access
27
Food diaries
3-7 day records of intake
28
24-hour recall
Verbal recall of previous days food
29
My fitness pal/ cronometer
Track calories, macros, micronutrients
30
Weighed food records
Highly accurate, but time-consuming
31
App-based tracking
New tach that scans meals, estimates nutrition
32
Lab analysis / biomarkers
Blood tests for nutrient status (iron, vitamin D)