Studies Flashcards

1
Q

Pavlov aim

A

Investigate if unconditioned response is linked neutral stimulus causing learning of a conditioned response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pavlov procedure

A

Placed dog in a box > couldn’t hear or smell anything > control extraneous variables
Measure Dv> tube attached to dog mouth measure the saliva produced >NS ( bell) was paired with the UCS(food) [ 20×] > Causing UCR ( saliva ) > tried without food > 9seconds after bell> 11 saliva drops> showing UCS paired w NS = Production of saliva ( CR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How was pavlov controlled

A

The dog was put in a box to prevent smell or sounds from getting in - extraneous variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the dv of pavlov study

A

Attached a tube to the dogs mouth to measure the amount of saliva produced ( ucr /cr)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How was the Cs made and how did it affect the Cr

A

Paired Bell( Ns) with Food( ucs) 20× 9seconds after 11 drops of saliva

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How many time was NS paired with UCS
How many seconds did it take for CR
How many drops of saliva ( with or without UCS

A

20×
9 seconds
11 saliva drops without Ucs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Watson and rayner aim

A

Investigate if fear could be acquired by classical conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who was the participant for Watson and rayner

A

9 month old baby Albert

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Session 1 of Watson and rayner
l

A

Albert - measure his initial emotional response
Presented white rat dog and cotton wool(ns)
No fear response
Exposed to loud noise (ucs) Albert’s response was crying (UCR)
7 trial= fear and avoid rat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Session 2 of w and rayner

A

Week later Albert was exposed to the rat paired with loud noise 5x

Tested w wooden block= no fear
Showing he wasn’t getting more general fear but just loud noise And rat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Session 3 of w and rayner

A

Albert was shown a range of objects = rabbits dog santa mask had resemblance to white dog

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Session 4 of w and rayner

A

Albert was moved to different room
Ensure rat= afraid
Room = no fear
Albert was afraid of rat in all rooms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Session 5 of w and rayner

A

Albert tested a month later
He was still afraid of rat a month later by crying including other objects like dog

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conclusion of w and rayner

A

Easy to condition an emotional response to a neutral stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Recall questions
How old was Albert?
Give 3 objects he was tested with?
What was the loud noise?
How much time pasted for session 2 to take place ?
How many times what’s he exposed to rat paid with Loud noise
What was the control he was tested with ?
How much time pasted for session 5 to take place?
How many trials did it take for Albert to be conditioned to fear rat?

A

1)9 months
2) Rabbit dog santa mask
3) hammer hitting bar
4) a week
5) 5x
6) wooden block and room change
7) month
8) 7 trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Session 5

A

Tested his final response tk all objects rats dog etc
Crying and afraid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Bandura et al study 1961- aim

A

Investigate:
Aggression acquired by observed behaviour
Boys more prone to acquiring aggressive behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is the experiment design for bandura

A

Independent groups design

19
Q

Who were the participants and where did they come from

A

36 boys / 36 girls Stafford University nursery

20
Q

How many experimental groups were they and wht were they

A

3
24 observing aggressive role model
24 observing non aggressive role model
24 observing no model

21
Q

Procedure of bandura 61
Observation

A

Aggressive role model: Children saw adult beat the bobo doll using a mallot “pow”
Non Aggressive: Children saw him play with toy

22
Q

How did the children behave after observation of model qnd how did we find this
Reproduction

A

Children play with toys in a room
Children taken to another room and told they couldn’t play with toy= triggers Children makes them angry
Children placed in another with a range of toys ( bobodoll) and were covertly observed

24
Q

Findings of bandura 61

A

Boys more aggressive than girls
The most aggressive group
M.child w M. Model aggressive group

25
Q

Conclusion of bandura 61

A

They generalise aggressive acts toward everything as they were taught behaviour can be learnt via imitation

26
Q

Bandura 61

27
Q

Bandura 65

A

Punishment / reinforcement toward model

28
Q

Procedure of bandura variation 63

A

See if filmed model would have the same effect on children aggression as live model

See if cartoon has the same effect on children aggression
48 boys girls

29
Q

Finding of bandura 63

A

Different between 3 experiments = insignificant
But more aggression than control
Watching violent shows = more aggression

30
Q

Aim of bandura variation 65

A

Wanted to see how punishment or reinforcement to aggressive model would affect children aggression

31
Q

Procedure of bandura variation 65

A

Children saw model praised for beating bobo doll > get chocolate

Children saw model punished for beating bobo doll> spanked

Control > neither punished or reinforced

32
Q

Findings of bandura variation 65

A

Model punished> children less aggressive than other two groups

When offered reward aggression when up

33
Q

What is ur contemporary study

A

Becker at el

34
Q

Aim of Becker at el

A

Investigate how the influence of TV would affect the eating habits of 17 Yr old Fijian girls

35
Q

How did they measure eating habits of Fijian girls

A

Via EAT -26 questionnaire and interview data

36
Q

What was group 1 and group 2 Becker et al

A

Group 1- data was collected before western TV became widespread

Group 2- collected after 1998

37
Q

What did they measure in the girls and what happened after
Becker at el

A

Height and weight
Girls with tendencies of dysfunctional eating based on the Eat -26 would get a further interview

38
Q

What questions was asked to the 1998 group Becker at el

A

Do you think you should eat less ?

39
Q

What was the qualitative findings Becker et al quote

A

Found that when they see some characters are very fit un their body and they try to be like that and then try to be like that characters

40
Q

Finishings of Becker at el

A

Increase in TV ownership ( )
Increase in vomiting behaviour

41
Q

What was the percentage increase in vomiting and TV ownership

A

Vomiting- 11.3
Tv-77

42
Q

Conclusion of Becker at el

A

TV does have an impact on women’s eating standards

43
Q

Overall procedure of becker at el

A

Girls in different groups
Group 1 before western TV became main stream
Group 2 after 1998
Given EAT- 26 questionnaire and interviewed them
Then measured their height and weight
Those who had tendencies of dysfunctional eating due to Eat-26 got a futher interview
And we’re asked “ do you think you should eat less “
We found that TV ownership and vomiting behaviour increases
We also found that “ when they see some characters are very fit in their body and then try to be like that and try to be like that character”
Overall TV does have an impact on women eating habits

44
Q

What is your classic study

A

Watson and rayner

45
Q

Bandura 63

A

Filmed model
Cartoon variation