Structured Interviews (20) Flashcards
Interviews
A series of questions put by a researcher to a respondent
Primary Research Collection
Qualitative and Quantitative Data collection through the use of different approaches and questions
Structured Interviews
Involves researcher asking a series of questions from an interview schedule
All respondents given the same set of questions in the same order
Usually closed so transcribing answers are straight forward as simple tick boxes and multiple choice answers
Quantitative Data so reliable
Sometimes Qualitative Data
Reliability of Structured Interviews
Easy to replicate as a fixed set of closed Qs and tick boxes generates large amounts of quantitative data, that’s factual, easy to convert to groups to compare, easy to quantify to test for reliability
All asked the same Qs in the same manner potentially be the same interviewer. Regulated through the standardised procedure and no room for deviation from Q set
Reliability Example (Health Survey)
Health Survey for England: Health of older people conducted 2,673 interviews with adults aged over 65
Asked standardised Qs about general health, alcohol, smoking and consumption of fruit and vegetables
Representativeness of Structured Interviews
Quick and Easy method that can be replicated quickly and geographically as only the interviewer needs to be mobile to reach respondents
Easy to quantify, large representative sample on the fairly easy to simplify finding to apply to the general or target population
Large samples
Representativeness Example (BCS)
British Crime Survey: Around 51,000 people interviewed. Including 47,000 adults aged 16 and over and 4000 aged 10 to 15. Response Rate of 76% which is the highest of a large continuous survey.
Various ages so applicable to the general population
Validity of Structured Interviews
Is an artificial device that isn’t natural or normal part of everyday reality. So people respond with suspicion and so many only supply evasive, partial or false information
Interviewer bias. Undermines validity as they know the aim. Not measuring intention. Demand Characteristics caused by the interviewer unconsciously leading responses through tone of voice or looks of approval or disapproval
May react negatively in an interview because of social characteristics like age, gender, social class, ethnicity
Undermines ability to build rapport with respondent and therefore truthfulness of the answers
Inflexible. Schedules are pre-decided and must be stuck to rigorously
Validity Example
Labov: Race of interviewer affected young black pupils in speech tests so the conclusion ended that they had inferior language skills (English) It didn’t reflect the reality.
Practical Issues of Structured Interviewers
Can be conducted quickly because of pre-set Qs. 100,000 in a short amount of time
Better response rates than Questionnaires as the interviewer is there and getting the response straight away
Success depends on the interviewer’s skills and what people know about their own behaviour. Needs to be able to illicit behaviour from respondents
Self-report and dependant on memory
Costs of Interviewer and travel
Extensive planning needed which is time-consuming
Feminists Perspective of Structured Interviews
Theoretical advantages of SI.
Provide space for critical reflection and interaction between interviewers and interviewee
Positivists Perspective of Structured Interviews
Method is scientific.
Data is standardised.
Reliable, Objective and Quantifiable.
Interpretivists Perspective of Structured Interviews
Makes it impossible to pursue any interesting leads that may emerge during the course of the interview
Closed Qs and category list responses suffer from an imposition problem
What interviewer thinks not the respondent
The researcher has mapped out responses by choosing options. May miss something important
Understanding ‘vernstien’ is more important than representatives
Ethical Issues of Structured Interviews
Aims and objective of research can be explained and clarified. Address ethical concerns in person, straight away.
Consent and Right to withdraw.
Sensitive subjects may cause harm.
Confidentially improves accuracy.
Conclusion
Despite imperfections, practicality and flexibility of interviewers make them attractive to interviewers.
Wildly used to save times and costs as funding issues
More personal than Questionnaires
Can be adjusted to semi-structured
Hammersly and Gomm: Interview data handled carefully and used in combination with other methods
Townsend
This research was reported in Poverty in the United Kingdom and a key finding was that there were levels of income below which consumption and participation fell well below what might be seen as normal or acceptable in an increasingly affluent society. It was this group that was seen to be in poverty.