Secondary Sources (20) Flashcards
Secondary Sources/Data Definition
Data that the sociologist hasn’t collected themselves but already exists
What does Secondary Data include?
Bryman suggested it includes Life Documents, Offical Documents, Mass Media and Previous Sociological research
Qualitative or Quantitative
Different form of SD can give both Qual or Quant data or even both
Tends to be more qual from visual and printed sources like newspaper, letters, diaries, TV programs, historical documents and school records
Why are they Used?
Quicker than creating own primary data Past events and attitudes investigated Comparisons over time Safer than investigating People may be unable to comment
Reliability of Secondary Sources
Depends on the source
If not reliable than shouldn’t be used especially if you don’t know the procedure or if there was any bias
Newspapers, Magazine and Websites don’t use rigorous or well-checked methods of documentation
Standardised Procedure may not present
Browne: All secondary sources must be treated with caution as it isn’t always possible to know the criteria surrounding the collection or selection of the data
Reliability Examples (Anne Frank)
Dairies can provide a reliable alternative to the traditional interview method for events that are difficult to recall or easily forgotten
Historical documents can cover longer periods of time hindering reliability
Anne Frank’s diaries informed us of the full range of emotions experienced under extreme distress during WW2 but it cannot be repeated
Representativeness of Secondary Sources
Personal accounts of individuals that may not be representative or generalizable data
Determining whether a document is a representative depends on whether it is typical if it’s complete or if parts are missing and whose values and views the sources reflect. Represent bias or partisan views.
Researchers rarely investigate ordinary people so if personal documents from atypical examples are used like gang members they aren’t representative
High Validity of Secondary Sources
Personal Document is viewed as reflecting the naturalistic arena where individuals can explore their own thoughts and feelings.
Produce rich qualitative data high in validity.
Offers insight into behaviour and experiences.
Not written for public consumption so highly accurate and valid.
Low Validity of Secondary Sources
Historical documents may be subjective, biased, prejudiced and one-sided. No way checking as dead. No way of judging how honest they are.
Newspapers, magazines and websites do not use rigorous and well-controlled methods in the documentation. Opinion based and far from facts to make the situation seem better or worse.
Validity Example (Cohen)
Cohen highlighted the inaccuracy in media portrayals.
Investigations of reports between Mods and Rockers
Media exaggerated original incidents of fighting
Created folk devils and moral panic
Cannot be used as an accurate representation of events at the time
The practicality of Secondary Sources
Qualitative Secondary Sources are sometimes the only data available so have to be used. Laslett research on families across several countries wouldn’t be possible if records hadn’t be kept. Useful in making comparisons over time.
Saves time. Quality documents make primary data unnecessary
Easy Access. Already in access and already in the public domain. Public documents are created or recorded by government departments like Armed Forces, NHS and judicial system. Kept by national archive which is considered too accurate.
Vast amounts are so easy to obtain. Libraries are free
Practical Issues
Obtaining access.
Data Format so will need converting. Visual to word for example.
Dated Nature. Only historical documents can be used forever. Only applies to a certain time period
Interpretivists Interpretation of Secondary Sources
Generally, favour life documents in particular (first-hand accounts of social events and personal experiences including the writers feelings and attitudes)
Not written by the researcher but for the respondents own purpose
Ecologically valid as provides ‘window’ into natural thought processes
Gabb and Emotion Maps - own thoughts and meaning
Positivists Interpretation of Secondary Sources
Scott identified 4 theoretical limitations that undermine the usefulness of historical documents
- Authenticity ( Missing and Cannot verify)
- Credibility (can’t verify the document, ie who wrote it, motive for writing, not objective)
- Meaning (Archaic language can easily be misconstrued and cannot be clarified)
- Reprenstaivness (Can’t generalise)
Conclusion
Can be useful
Proceeded with Caution