Structural frame Flashcards
weber’s 6 characterisitcs of the structural frame
- division of labor
- hierarchy of offices
- rules-based for governing
- seperation of person and office
- technical qualifications guide selecting personnel
- employment is primary occupation
structural imperatives
characterisitcs of an organization which dictate the optimal structure. structure of an organization depends on these different characteristics.
- size and age -> increased by complexity and formality
- core process
- environment -> stable of uncertain?
- strategy and goals
- information technology -> more decentralized
- nature of the workforce -> more professional, want more autonomy
structural dilemmas
finding a system that fits all characteristics of a company in the right way is really hard. companies have to make choices in their structure and chose which structural imperatives are more important.
- differentiation vs integration = tension between dividing work and coordinating it.
- gap vs overlap = tasks being unattended vs unnecessarily duplicated.
- underuse vs overload = too little vs too much work.
- lack of clarity vs lack of creativity = tasks may be interpreted too independently instead of woriking towards same goal. when tasks are too clear, no room for creativity.
- excessive autonomy vs excessive interdependence = when work is done too independently workers feel isolated. when work is too dependent a lot of time goes to coordination.
- too lose vs too tight = too loose structure, people go their own way without knowing what others do. too rigid employees resist the system.
- goal-less vs goal-bound = employees don’t know the purpose or goals are outdated.
- irresponsible vs unresponsive = performance suffer from not taking responsibility, bt also from too strictly adhering policy.
vertical coordination
refers to the process of coordinating and controlling the work of subordinates through: authority, rules and policies, planning and control systems.
horizontal coordination
fills the gaps left by vertical coordination. is more flexible/less formal, allowing for relatively simple orgamizations -> meetings, special units, coordinating functions, matrix structure (report to two people), networks
the Mintzberg model
rough map to help managers understand organizational structure:
- operating core = workers that provide products or services to customers.
- administrative component = managers that supervise, coordinate, control and provide resources for the operators.
- technostructure = specialists that standerdize, measure and inspects outputs and procedures.
- support staff = performs tasks that supports and facilitates the work of others in the organization.
- strategic apex = track developments in the environment, determine strategy and shape the grand design.
coordination as a core principles of the mintzberg model
- mutual adjustment
- direct supervision
- standerdization of skills
- standerdization of work processes
- standerdization of norms
- standerdization of outputs
5 configurations of organizations
- simple structure -> operating core + strategic apex
- machine bureaucracy –> standardization of work, mostly technostructure and strategic apex.
- professional bureaucracy -> organization that employ a lot of highly educated professionals to perform core task.
- divisionalized form -> work is done in semi-independent units, like specialized departments. each unit operates independently but benefits from shared resources and stability across the organization.
- adhocracy -> focus is more on the goal of the project, operating core it outsourced.
Helgesen’s web of inclusion
structure extends from a central point, with each connection reinforcing the organization, but weaknesses in any part can affet the whole.
pressures that can lead to the conclusion of restructering
- the environment shift
- technology changes
- organizations grow
- leadership changes
firms that fall into trouble during restructuring fall into one of these configurations…
- the impulsive firm = fast growing, structure and control have become too primitive.
- the stagnant bureaucracy = top management too committed to old ways.
- the headless giant = weak strategic apex, little strategy
self-managing teams
group of interdependent individuals that can self-regulate their behavior on whole tasks:
- interdependence of tasks
- self-management for tasks
- mainly functional for complex output and professional members
- shared goal, trust, individual skills and enabling culture are keys to success
fundamental structures for groups of 5 people
- one-boss arrangement
- dual authority
- simple hierarchy
- circle network
- all-channel or star network